BuffaloHokie13

I don't know how it could be the latter. Everybody knows Tyrod doesn't allow his receivers to run after the catch...

I believe so, yes. But that's a different question considering he's already started 44. I didn't ask if Peterman would start 76 games, just 2 full seasons worth. And again, my post made absolutely no mention of Tyrod. Tyrod has no bearing on Peterman. He doesn't need to be brought up every time Peterman is. Peterman can suck all by himself.

For whatever it may be worth, our 2 2nd round picks are worth enough to get into the 28-32 range. We could, potentially, have 3 first round picks if the draft falls in a way that it is beneficial (i.e. Rudolph at 21, Smith/Vea/Edmunds at 22, Harrison Phillips at 28-32 range pick.)

Do you believe Peterman will start 32 games over the course of his career?

You really just can't help yourself can you? You're obsessed! In a thread about Peterman you quote a post about Peterman that has no mention whatsoever of Tyrod, and you are still compelled to bring him up. Why? Tyrod's mediocrity has absolutely no bearing on Peterman's abysmal play. Here's a fun fact: over his ~5 quarters of play, Peterman exactly matched Tyrod's passing TD% as a Buffalo Bill (4.1%). Here's another fun fact: In 2017, among all players who attempted at least 20 passes, only one had an INT% over 10% (Peterman). The next highest after Peterman was a tie between Kevin Hogan and Paxton Lynch at 6.7% You want better than Tyrod? Great! Peterman ain't it. And he's gonna need major gains in arm strength to ever even come close.

Moorman was easily the best player on our team for like a 5 year stretch

Williams, Williams, Williams, and Williams

Da Da Da Denny & the Jets

I'm not saying it's likely, but assuming they have their top 3 QBs graded virtually the same (within reason) then they might pick up whomever they believe is the best player in the draft at 1 and take the remaining QB, or potentially a choice if Indy stays put, from the remaining 2. Crazier things have happened!

1. Whatever QB we draft is the right one. 2. We acquire our 'QB of the D' MLB

I don't doubt that he does good work, I just couldn't speak to him with a straight face.

Not to get off topic, but Dr. Cappuccino? Really?

Or they won't be presentable/capable until Monday, potentially.

Not yet, texts out. But for anyone to imply that he would fake an injury is beyond out of bounds. All he's done is work his butt off and play his heart out for this team and city and QB them to their first playoff appearance in 17 years. The man deserves better than that BS.

Honestly, off.

I heard he's actually really into Canadian girls.

Not saying it's definitely the cause, but he lost his top 2 receiving threats to the NFL (WR & TE). Maybe in '16 he was comfortable with them as safety valves and this year he felt he didn't have that trust so he took more sacks?

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/josh-allen-7.html#passing::none Curious indeed. EDIT: Turns out they send invites to 4th year juniors that have graduated.

In College sacks are removed from rush yards instead of pass yards. I can't see the article though, so I don't know if that makes sense in the context of what you're looking at.

He's not a senior, for one. Neither is Darnold, but I suppose that's why he has a maybe next to his name?

I don't trust tables that don't know what school he was at in 2011

He had a fundamental disagreement with how the staff wanted to use him, from what I understand.

Yes, like I said he had a lot of TDs. Everything other than TDs was pretty meh. 28th in Completion % 16th in Passing Yards 24th in Passing Yards per Game 7th in YPA T-7th in Passer Rating (with Tyrod )

I don't see this happening at all. I certainly don't speak for everyone, but if we come away with Rosen, Darnold, Rudolph, or Mayfield in the first I'm happy. Allen, in my opinion, isn't a first round prospect. If we use a first round pick on a non-first round prospect I will be upset - much like I was when we did just that with Manuel. Though that was mitigated slightly by the fact that we traded back before doing it.