BuffaloHokie13

3 1sts over the next 2 years is definitely more appealing than 2 1sts and a later pick for several reasons, one of which you touched on. All 3 of those picks will have the 5th year option available. I have valued out many trades to get to pick 2, 3, or 4 even factoring in as much as 40% inflation and that's without considering adding players. A move into the top 5 is most certainly doable.

It's nice and all that Allen broke the record, except if he can't throw with touch. Then it's a problem (and I believe it is).

I don't think have to spend any. But if we want to stay competitive we probably should.

Interesting.

I'd say Romo is a natural fit, but I don't know how that'd work since he's currently with CBS.

Didn't know we had a Jordan Metthews in the first place... But really, Matthews' skillset is redundant here and it isn't needed. That is not to say he doesn't have value to someone, I just don't see the value to the Bills specifically.

No, no it wasn't. This past year 3 of their top 4 receivers were in their 1st year with the team (Kupp - rookie, Woods & Watkins from Buffalo) and the 4th was their RB.

1, and that is completely irrelevant to the statement I disagree with.

Dawkins & Vallejo are my picks. Zay will settle into the slot nicely as well, but I don't expect anything spectacular.

Deandre Hopkins disagrees with your sentiment.

If I had to identify a floor for Rudolph in the draft it would be pick 48 by the Los Angeles Chargers. I don't see him making it past that pick, but I could see him going earlier. I don't see him going before pick 21 either. That's his range for me. Somewhere between picks 21 and 48.

If we're moving up it's Rosen, if we're staying put at 21 it's Rudolph, and if we're kicking the can down the curb it's Ferguson with pick 96. jmo

No denying that.

~$13M IIRC

Sammy's best statistical year to this point was the first year he and Tyrod played together. And he did it in 13 games, to boot.

I don't see any available veteran QB as the answer, Tyrod and Foles included. Both are only acceptable if a high end rookie prospect is also in the fold. I dislike Foles as an option quite a bit because he requires resources that could be used to build our roster.

The tough part about the valuation is that, despite taking WR1 snaps and high efficiency, he was still 4th on the team in targets and behind 2 other WRs. He's played ~3.5 years now, and while his efficiency stats have always been good, at some point you have to ask why he doesn't get Brown/Jones/ODB/Hopkins type targets?

My guess is 1-2 years at most with an AAV of $7M.

Who are you even referencing at this point? Seems like you're arguing with nobody.

He clearly doesn't have 'running away from the cops speed' as Gus Johnson would say.

Wasn't Young let go by Tampa after a couple seasons?

Right now I just feel like we need so many positions filled that I don't mind giving up the future 1st even, since the LBs and DL look so solid this year. Those feelings will likely adjust as we make our way through FA though.

21, 21, 2019 1st. In actuality I'd have offered 21, 22, 2019 2nd, and Glenn, but I can't include players.