TPS

It's not compelling for people who think the government must borrow before it can spend. Governments that control and issue their own currency stimulate greater wealth creation by the private sector when they spend more than they tax in any given year (aka deficit spending).

No one said "better job." I'm just happy you now agree government does create wealth....?

Who are these socialists? https://www.businessroundtable.org/business-roundtable-redefines-the-purpose-of-a-corporation-to-promote-an-economy-that-serves-all-americans

Been thinking about this, given Morse’s issues. I think they’re fine on the interior with the guys you list. I think they are better with Nsekhe at RT, so they do need a swing T. Hopefully they will play Bates at both tackles in these next 2 games as an audition.

No, you're in the archives from 10 years ago....

Both actions increase the value of their stock. I’m glad you finally acknowledge that government influences wealth creation.

The $1.5 trillion in Reserves are also on the BS of banks, so why isn't it inflationary? It's clear you don't understand the fundamental causes of inflation. You clearly underestimate the power of central banks. And, the majority of Japanese debt is held internally, so the government bond market doesn't have much influence on the yen exchange rate. Raytheon is used as one example of how government spending influences the value of a companies shares (wealth creation). So it appears that you now agree that government spending influences wealth creation.... And the US controls most of the international payments system. Look what happens when a country gets on our bad side....a dominant military force is also a requirement to be the reserve currency....

Here's what it states: https://www.thebalance.com/us-debt-by-president-by-dollar-and-percent-3306296

Again, 30% is the projection for Trump’s first term only. It’s also hard to compare Admins who experienced serious recessions like Rr and Obama. I’m not sure what your point was, and I don’t think I gave it much of a look the first time...it bordered on my length! ?

I guess if you ignore the democratic presidents... Blasphemy! You mean government spending explains faster growth under Trump? I'm shocked, shocked I tell ya....

This is not true. You made an error in that post. You said Trump's increase would be 30% "estimated for 8 years," but the 30% was for his first term only. The projected amount for 8 years was an increase of $9.1 trillion over Obama's ending total of $20.245 trillion, which is a 45% increase.

I think this is a mostly fair assessment of Trump's predicament with the economy. https://news.yahoo.com/recession-signs-worry-trump-ahead-213427540.html .

Maybe they'll put Kroft on the PUP list, keeping Smith, Knox, and Sweeney?

I’m with you on this. Watch the Shady TD. He and Long create a huge hole and DiMarco takes care of the LB. This may be the deepest OL group they’ve had in a long time.

Feliciano also looks like an upgrade over last year, if he has to play C. Two Similar plays from last night that show a huge upgrade: Shady's TD and a 3rd down and short run for the first. The OL won the line of scrimmage on both. That was rare last year in short yardage.

Pass Pro excellent in some of those and good in others.

The US has already given up its economic supremacy, and, as I stated, it has nothing to do with MMT. The economic demise is inevitable, and it is usually associated with finance becoming the dominant "industry," an industry that produces no tangible good. Please explain why QE is "fundamentally inflationary." As I've suggested, your errors seem to stem from not understanding the causes of inflation, so please do explain. If this was true, then please explain why there is no inflation in Japan. And "some day" is not an answer....do YOU have a theory? The statement that "deficit spending stimulates an increase in private sector wealth creation" is not the same thing as saying "all private sector wealth creation depends on government actions." I'll say it again for you, government does not create wealth, but it does spur greater wealth creation by the private sector when it deficit spends because it puts more REAL resources to work (like the Raytheon example). As TRump has shown, government does not have to tax to spend more on Raytheon's "products; in fact, he cut taxes AND increased defense spending--he increased the level of deficit spending! (I wonder how Raytheon's share prices reacted to Trump's increase in defense spending...?) Yes, the discussion will go nowhere because you don't understand the nature of the argument, as that second sentence indicates. Where does money come from? How do people and firms pay their taxes? A complete straw man statement.

Context is everything.... "The Israeli government used my love and desire to see my grandmother to silence me and made my ability to do so contingent upon my signing a letter — reflecting just how undemocratic and afraid they are of the truth my trip would reveal about what is happening in the State of Israel and to Palestinians living under occupation with United States support," she said in the statement.

Yeah, he's making the team. Love and Johnson are both LDEs.

He's not ready for prime time. I doubt he's going to Play STs, so anyone who would try to poach him would have to stash him on the 53. It appears you're saying, though, that, as the designated transition player, the Bills can assign him to the PS without going through waivers? Thanks.

I agree; he would be picked up by someone. So does that mean he takes Love's spot or do they keep 5 as I suggested?

How about ST in general? The blocking on the returns looked good too. Not enough punts by the Bills to judge the coverage.

Johnson will be an interesting decision, as will Be LDE in general. Love vs Johnson. I think Yarbrough has backed up Jerry previously, but Shaw is there now. Johnson may force them to keep 5 DE, Love being the 8th. The DTs are set.