TPS

Peterman may not have a rocket arm, but he's smart and accurate. I believe that, As he gains experience (it is only his 3rd year coming up), he will learn to avoid mistakes on the types of throws that are dangerous for him, and will do some good things in this league.

Yes, always enjoyed him on the Bills show on Adelphi’s?

Cool. Let me know who wins this argument, though I’m not sure who you’re arguing with now...

I guess the answer is no. [And your interpretation is wrong, as usual. When I say Trump's numbers are not much better than Obama's, that's calling out the current roosters....]

I see. At the moment, Trump has not had a year of growth exceeding Obama's best year. I will bet you a nice bottle of Cabernet that he won't exceed 3% in any of his 4 years.... As I said, it's a religion...he is the "chosen one" afterall.....

2017 = 2.4% 2018 = 2.9% So when can we expect growth above 3%?

The context is "True Trump Believers" think his policies have been extraordinary, but the truth (the data) is there is no statistical difference in most trends, and his one good year of GDP growth was stimulated in the good ol' Keynesian deficit spending (?) way....

Yes, and others have felt the same....

Religion can be a dangerous thing....

https://www.wsj.com/articles/cardinal-george-pell-loses-appeal-of-sexual-abuse-conviction-11566348234?mod=hp_lista_pos4 By Robb M. Stewart Aug. 20, 2019 8:43 pm ET MELBOURNE, Australia—Cardinal George Pell, the most senior Catholic cleric ever to be jailed for child sexual abuse, has lost his appeal of his conviction. A panel of Australian judges ruled 2-1 on Wednesday to uphold the cardinal’s conviction for assaulting two young choir boys inside the cathedral that was the center of his diocese in the late 1990s.

Oh, I recognize tax cuts and spending increases have different impacts--all corps will be affected by a change in the tax rate, but not all will be affected by spending increases. My point, all along, has been that deficits in general stimulate private sector wealth creation, a point you finally agree on.

It's not compelling for people who think the government must borrow before it can spend. Governments that control and issue their own currency stimulate greater wealth creation by the private sector when they spend more than they tax in any given year (aka deficit spending).

No one said "better job." I'm just happy you now agree government does create wealth....?

Who are these socialists? https://www.businessroundtable.org/business-roundtable-redefines-the-purpose-of-a-corporation-to-promote-an-economy-that-serves-all-americans

Been thinking about this, given Morse’s issues. I think they’re fine on the interior with the guys you list. I think they are better with Nsekhe at RT, so they do need a swing T. Hopefully they will play Bates at both tackles in these next 2 games as an audition.

No, you're in the archives from 10 years ago....

Both actions increase the value of their stock. I’m glad you finally acknowledge that government influences wealth creation.

The $1.5 trillion in Reserves are also on the BS of banks, so why isn't it inflationary? It's clear you don't understand the fundamental causes of inflation. You clearly underestimate the power of central banks. And, the majority of Japanese debt is held internally, so the government bond market doesn't have much influence on the yen exchange rate. Raytheon is used as one example of how government spending influences the value of a companies shares (wealth creation). So it appears that you now agree that government spending influences wealth creation.... And the US controls most of the international payments system. Look what happens when a country gets on our bad side....a dominant military force is also a requirement to be the reserve currency....

Here's what it states: https://www.thebalance.com/us-debt-by-president-by-dollar-and-percent-3306296

Again, 30% is the projection for Trump’s first term only. It’s also hard to compare Admins who experienced serious recessions like Rr and Obama. I’m not sure what your point was, and I don’t think I gave it much of a look the first time...it bordered on my length! ?

I guess if you ignore the democratic presidents... Blasphemy! You mean government spending explains faster growth under Trump? I'm shocked, shocked I tell ya....

This is not true. You made an error in that post. You said Trump's increase would be 30% "estimated for 8 years," but the 30% was for his first term only. The projected amount for 8 years was an increase of $9.1 trillion over Obama's ending total of $20.245 trillion, which is a 45% increase.

I think this is a mostly fair assessment of Trump's predicament with the economy. https://news.yahoo.com/recession-signs-worry-trump-ahead-213427540.html .