TPS

Yeah, that's the easy part. I'm interested in who those speculators are that got caught holding long positions the day before the May contract expires. As we transition into the June contract, it's down below $16 and falling. This WILL wipe out oil ETFs, so get your money out while you can....

Looks like he's missed quite a few games the past two years, KA.

Are you sure about those prices? Those look like the changes not the contract values? I mentioned oil ETFs up thread, but they can't be the reason because they "roll" out of their contracts the week before the expiring date, so it's going to be interesting to see who the long speculators are who got caught in the long squeeze. Maybe some inexperienced Hedgies? At any rate, those ETFs and Index Funds are still going to lose big time since they are "selling low and buying high," the negative roll yield in contango markets. If anyone comes across any articles on who the losers are, I'd appreciate a notification. I did read one thing that argued it was USO, but I looked at their roll dates (when they start selling the expiring May contract and buying the June contract), and they were April 7 through the 13th. They weren't sellers today (All of the institutional funds roll out at least the week before the contract expires). Interesting times...

negative $38

I hope gas prices reflect this in the next few days.... hmmm.... negative $0.25 per gallon...? ?

Hope you didn't buy any ETFs after that last discussion. Btw, @Foxx you nailed it. USO and other oil ETFs will dissolve this week, unless they have a friend in the WH.... They are now paying investors to accept bids on their May contracts so they can close their positions without having to take delivery--which they are incapable of. If they want to continue as an ETF, they'd have to buy the June at $21. Negative $8.50 and falling...

It is currently negative. It's the oil ETFs that are selling their contracts today, otherwise they have to take physical delivery--which they can't.

The May contract for WTI is now down to $0.90!!! That's 42,000 gallons of oil for 90 cents. If only I could store it somewhere....

Had trump not intervened, it would be down to $0.80...

I'll wait and see how R1 shakes out first.

How much do you charge for access to your board....?

Tough call. I narrowed it down to Dugger and CEH. I'm intrigued by how McD would use Dugger and what he could do in this D, but CEH insures that the O wouldn't skip a beat if Singeltary went down, so I went with him.

He’s more of a LDE, though he can cover given how athletic he is. He’s worth the risk if he lasts past #40 in the real deal. I’ll be shocked if he’s available at 54.

Someone should've leaked the drug rumors earlier...

Really sorry to hear that. Hang in there--thoughts and prayers.

Ahhhh....

Ha! He'd never make it that far!

Ha! Domino effect, blame @Doc Brown for taking Higgins in front of me!

Right, I would see him as a Lorax type player for them, because he's athletic enough to drop into coverage too.

I really wanted to pick Swift, but then I read a bit more about the other guy on their roster, Justin Jackson. Look out for this guy... I wanted Higgins because it would've fit my overall theme of getting a #1 QB, protecting him, and giving him a really, really good stable of receivers to throw to. I also thought seriously about Chinn, because they need a "big nickel" guy for their two meetings with Chiefs....

This was a tough choice for the Chargers. We were looking seriously at Higgins, or hoping Ruiz would fall, so it made it much easier.... With the 37th pick in the 2020 NFL Draft, the LA/SD Chargers select Zack Baun, Edge/LB Wisconsin. With both Bosa and Ingram UFA next year, the Chargers select Baun as Ingram's replacement (won't pay them both, and Ingram turns 31 this month). Baun also adds some athletic versatility to move between Edge and LB this year as he's being groomed to start next year. Since we gave up our R3 pick, all in all, the Chargers feel good about their draft. Rivers' replacement, a solid LT prospect, and a highly productive addition to the front 7. @Reed83HOF and the Panthers are on the clock.

Well, so much for the thinking there would be a run on OL near the end of R1..... Very different outcome from TSW Mock 2.0 as one would expect with different GMs. Adding those results from 2.0: 26 - Dolphins (NewEra) - Josh Jones, OT, Houston 27 - Seahawks (bkep32) - AJ Epenesa, DE, Iowa 28 - Ravens (H20) - Cesar Ruiz, C, Michigan 29 - Titans (Philo) - Lucas Niang OT, TCU 30 - Packers (Doc Brown) - Austin Jackson, OT, USC 31 - 49ers (Reed83HOF) - Denzel Mims, WR, Baylor 32 - Chiefs (Buffalo716) - Lloyd Cushenberry, C, LSU

****TRADE ALERT****** The Chargers are sending picks 41 and 71 to the 49ers for pick 26. With the 26th pick in the 2020 NFL draft, the Chargers select Josh Jones, OT, Houston. Sensing an impending run of OL picks in the back end of the draft, the Chargers use their pick acquired in the Browns trade to select Herbert's blind-side protector, allowing them to move Bulaga to the right side. @atlbillsfan1975 and the Seattle Seahawks are on the clock...

Operative word "two" .... Btw, one of the drawbacks of putting your board up is having someone like the Fins trade up to snag your higher rated OT... when you are a OT needy team.

I called it a coin flip. I went Jeudy because he is supposed to be the better route runner which I thought would suit Darnold better. Ruggs was gone, but I think I would've still taken Jeudy.