TPS

I acted on my initial reaction which was to find EWoods' replacement. In retrospect, I think they would go DT here to get KW's replacement.

Again, I'm not claiming Obama was great, he was not. For comparison, growth in his second term was equivalent to the average under Bushjr--they were both meh at 2.1%. I'm on record here as saying the tax cut will stimulate the economy this year and most likely next but then the next recession will hit. So if you want to include all 4 years no matter the outcome, then I expect the performance over his term won't look so great. Since he's juiced the economy with tax cuts when unemployment is at 4.1%, then that should help wages grow faster, which will be the underlying cause of the Fed's rate hikes and recession. Overall, I don't expect the aggregate numbers will look so great after 4 years, but I'm sure people will be able to find some positives to point to as a "success." We'll see... Because the largest deficits under Obama occurred during the recession years; Trump is jacking up deficits when the economy is near the peak of an expansion. That is mainly a problem because the you will be entering the next recession with already large deficits which will make politicians loathe to respond accordingly.

You're an idiot...with apologies to D.C. can you find a statement in this thread by someone saying "Obama was more pro-business than trump"?

Look, I know it's hard to understand, but all I'm saying is I'm willing to bet that the Trump economy won't outperform the past 4 years based on the measure of jobs created in the entire economy. If trump's policies are so great, then it should show up for the entire economy, not just Elkhart. And without doing a little research, I would think RV sales would be trending up for several years as baby boomers retire--not simply the past year. And what do you know... https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/12/rv-indicator/511787/

I'm tempted to quote Henny Youngman here....

Yes, that's what I'm trying to get someone to do. Obama's economy was mediocre over the past 4 years, but I'm willing to wager, in the end, those Obama years will be better statistically (in jobs) than what the rose colored glasses-wearing trump supporters think his policies will do.

Certainly one can't compare Obama's first term, given the crisis, so I'd be willing to wager that there will be fewer jobs created during Trump's only term than Obama's second....unless you think there's a better definition of "better".....?

And the Pope tried to tell us there's no Hell....

"relatively early" for me means before R4.

They will need to draft one relatively early. Shareece Wright would still win the backup role with the current group....

What!? This is great! I’m going to put $100 on the Bills winning the Super Bowl now. In his entire nfl career, the team he previously played for wins the Super Bowl...

I’ll take Vikings

I’m not the one suggesting they trade him.

If they traded him what do you think they’d get for him? I’m not saying he doesn’t have potential, rather we haven’t seen what he’s capable of over a full season.

I was just going to post (without going all the way through the thread) that he should visit TSW during the off-season....

And my same point, the Giants and Bucs don't have the cap space to take on Jerry's contract. Lawson hasn't proven anything to be worth anything...

The Giants don't have the cap space to take on his contract.

I grew up an Angel's fan. Been keeping an aye on his progress, and he didn't look good during spring training, but now that the real season is on, so is Ohtani. Homered In his first home at bat last night in a 13-2 victory over the Tribe. Pitched very well in his first start against the A's. Maybe the moniker as the Japanese Babe Ruth isn't so far off. Dick Enberg was the long time Angel's play-by-play announcer, and I am sure, after that HR, he would've exclaimed,, "Oh My Ohtani!"

And Buffalo has the largest DD party in the country!

TB doesn’t have an R3 pick so they should be interested. 12 and 56 for 7 and change. To get 2, it would cost 7, 22 and 53. Essentially it costs 12, 22, 53, and 56, but takes 2 moves to satisfy giants not wanting to go too far back.

Again, the question is NOT whether AJ is a franchise QB, it's "are the Bills a playoff team with AJ?" In my initial post I said they needed some help at other positions, but if they do that, then I think he's good enough to get them to the playoffs. If he isn't better than Tyrod, than you'd be right.

Because he’s yet to have an opportunity to play an entire season, so he is still an unknown quantity. The issue isn’t that he’s going to lead a franchise to the Super Bowl, rather can he get them to the playoffs? With an improved D, I think his small sample size shows it’s possible. Btw, the Bills are an NFL team...

How many games has he started? that said, I don’t think he’s the kind of QB that will put up 250-300 yds/g, but he can win them games and seems to have the ability to make comebacks, unlike TT.

They addressed their major weaknesses on D with FAs, run D and pass rush with Star and Trent. They still need an LB or 2, but it will come down to the OP’s question.

More noise? http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000924001/article/denver-broncos-open-to-possibly-drafting-qb-at-no-5