LabattBlue

American football would never succeed long term in soccer crazed Europe. I wish Goodell would drop the London games all together, but it looks like he is hell bent on keeping it going. Who knows what blue sky plans are discussed behind closed doors.

One of the HoF TSW threads... http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/23265-donahoe-is-the-son-of-satan/page__hl__satan

Got me there. Nice one.

Lets see you stand in the pocket over and over again with 300 pound lineman coming at you full speed while attempting to throw a football with accuracy, and then we will find out who the fairy is. :lol:

I think youse would be right.

Before you call for his head... 1 - Who decides what players start on the OL? 2 - Who comes up with the blocking schemes for the designed plays? Once you find that out, then you have your scapegoat for the sub-par OL play this season.

....or better yet rent a limo bus or town car and no one has to be the DD.

I meant their DL.

Well then respond to TBD, and not me.

They were bad before the game and bad afterwards. Their is no such thing as "the best 1-7 team". Their skills positions all SUCK, and outside of their front 4, I am not sure where they are even mediocre.

Abbott & Costello aka Marrone and Hackett are in WAY OVER THEIR HEADS. Their bozo inspired decisions & playcalling will allow the Bills to beat the bad teams in spite of them, but will get them totally outclassed come December when the games mean the most.

Trolley Stop?

Aren't you the same guy who started a poll about himself asking if you should stay or go? Maybe you should have ignored the results of that poll.

That makes two of us.

My observation...most WR's don't get that much separation unless coverages are blown. The difference is having a QB who can accurately throw the ball into tight coverage.

Watkins % of receptions that go for a 1st down is mind boggling. 77.1%. That is tops among the top 50 players in terms of receptions. I'll admit I was skeptical of the trade because of what they gave up, but he has been very good as a rookie to date.

Triple Lindy?

The officials work for the owners>>>>the owners don't want to be embarrassed>>>>the officials post game reviews will never be made public.

WOW...what an egotistical blowhard.

Best post in the thread. No surprise that there are no responses to it. but but but the refs talk to Belicheck but not Marrone!

They don't need a "first class" massive facility or hundreds of luxury suites. A 25-30k stadium with the potential to be expanded to 40-45k would suffice. The Bulls could play in a new Bills stadium, but if they can't draw fans to an ON-campus stadium, how are they going to draw better with an OFF-campus stadium?

Build a stadium that is football friendly(not one that has a running track around it, and has end zone bleachers miles from the field), and that would be a good start towards getting more people there. Their biggest problem is getting the students to go. You have 30,000 students who at least some of can get in for free, yet the majority stay home. They could fill that half-ass stadium all by themselves.

Pepsi Center would just be a temporary home. I just think that hockey would be a great fit.

All right....I stand corrected on the basketball team which I was more critical than they deserve. But my comments on the AD, football, lacrosse and hockey, I'll stand behind. You have hockey rinks right across from North campus, and lacrosse can be played on the football field. In the meantime, it's football football football. If they want to rebuild the football program, start with that crap stadium. Ok...I feel better now.

UB sports are a trainwreck. The football team has been a mess except for a couple seasons, and the basketball team except for the one or two year run w/Turner Battle have been equally mediocre. Embarrassing for a school their size. At the same time, despite being in a hockey and lacrosse playing hotbed, we have another AD that doesn't even want to consider adding these sports.