KRC

Happy Birthday Rubeo and TheBiscuit. Who is this Mrs.KRC person that shares your birthdays?

Where, in the article, do you see that the answers were scripted? I read the article a couple of times and I did not see that the answers were given to the soldiers. The order in which the soldiers were called on was scripted, but where does it say that the soldiers were told exactly what to say and how to say it?

March of the Penguins - Director's Cut, with an additional 2 hours of footage.

...but yet, nobody wants to "throw away their vote" on a third party/independent candidate because that candidate is too "radical."

These were natural disasters?

No question it would be a team move and not a new team. All divisions and conferences are equal in size. Adding a team would throw that out of whack. NO is a possibility (Katrina increased that possibility). What about the Cardinals? San Diego was mentioned. The NFL wants a team in LA, regardless of whether it is feasible from a fan perspective. They want the TV market.

...because it continues to be true.

Hell, Eric Moulds should be ahead of Rashad. One less Pro Bowl, but Moulds has equal if not better overall stats. Even a case could be made for Frank Lewis, although I would put the overall career of Rashad ahead of Lewis.

I agree with your assessments. The first thing that I picked out from the original list was Ahmad Rashad??? Why is he on that list?

DT was eligible starting last year. Barry is already in the HOF (2004).

You would be correct. My bad.

I agree, but he will still be a first ballot HOF'er. I do not think that there are other "name" people this year to bump him to next year. It is as much a popularity contest as anything else.

Here is who he is up against: Troy Aikman Warren Moon Andre Reed Deion Sanders Reggie White TT will make it before Reed, but Aikman, Sanders and White make it before TT. Also up: John Madden as a senior candidate.

The depth of your argument is based on one team last year?

Change the QB.

...and the reason why haven't reposted it yet would be what?

Exactly my point. Stats do not tell the story.

Important point. When the teams are leading, the RBs are going to get more carries in order to run out the clock. When teams are losing, they will start passing more. This factor is left out of the stats people like to use when attempting to make their point. Thanks for bringing it up.

They are not paying their "fair share" of the burden of supplying laptops to the poor.

Yup. Ironically, in my research for my book last night, I was going through an interview he had with Arms Control Today from March of this year. You would probably find it interesting. The same issue had an article on Khan, along with the updates (at the time) regarding the DPRK nuke stuff.

Stop trying to obstruct our fundamental right to WiFi.

Since wireless is a "fundamental right," what are his plans to guarantee that everyone has a computer to access these services? Is he going to buy laptops for everyone? How can they access their "fundamental right" to the internet if they cannot afford a computer?

Which is a good thing?

Don't let the fact that kids today can't even locate Hawaii on a map fool you. Our educational system is top-notch (as long as you do not compare it to anything). We have straight 'A' students. Why? Because anything else would hurt their feelings and we would have to change from red pens to purple pens to mark "differences in opinion."** ** You cannot call them "mistakes" for fear of being sued by the parents for ruining the psyche of their kid.

Exploding deficits, regulation to the point of stifling advances, government dependency, etc. Yup. Things are much better now.