KRC

Trying to run them out of office means that I support them. What is so hard to understand about that?

These indictments look just like the last one, except the charges are different. In both cases, DeLay is charged with the fact that he "may or may not have been involved." DeLay Indictment Take Two First attempt...

Nice job, Earle.

If you want to talk ABC in Philly, you cannot ignore Cecily Tynan.

Republicans are no different than Democrats. Same sh--, different package. Then, maybe you ought to use the search function. You will find my proposals for many different issues. Why be informed before spouting off, right Sparkey?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

Wow. I have them going on a 3-game winning streak from here. Somebody must have spiked my homebrew. What was I thinking?

Guilty until proven innocent. Nice job, counselor. I gave up on having reasonable discussions with you a long time ago. You used to be a quality poster. You have now just turned into an apologist for the DNC and have lost all credibility.

You are so cute when you automatically assign opinions to people, but get your panties in a bunch when people do it to you. Hypocrite, thy name is Mickey. The DA tried several different times to get an indictment against DeLay. He failed numerous times but still forged ahead to find anything he could. When the indictment reads, "the defendents...did enter into an agreement with one or more of each other," you know that he had trouble getting this to stick. All you have to do is read the indictment as it spells out the wrongdoings of the other defendents, but only mentions DeLay as waiving some legal rights. Huh?

The DNC mouthpiece/apologist strikes again. You must be pretty limber to be able to twist yourself in a pretzel on a regular basis, trying to fabricate things to suit your agenda.

Earle has tried for something more serious. I understand that this is the sixth grand jury. The previous five would not indict DeLay. The hatchet job is not going very well and this was the best that Earle could do.

Pretty funny to see the libertards get their panties in a bunch over remarks allegedly promoting abortion of black babies when the person making the statement is on record (and has been very consistent) about being anti-abortion.

It is more important to label people racists than it is to actually find out what was said. When you can't compete, you must discredit.

Drug Czar and Secretary of Education.

...and I doubt any one of them actually listened to the statements before and after the comment. DING!! Hot Pockets are done.

Since they can't compete with ideas, they need to resort to this type of behavior. It is no wonder they can't win elections.

Anyone have a tape of the show they would be willing to send to me? I will reimburse all costs. My wife loves the show and my VCR screwed up the tape. My wife was depressed. Can anyone help?

Exactly. Federalizing charitable organizations is ridiculous. It does not matter if they are faith-based or secular. Terrible idea.

God told him to do it.

Your question was: "Is it truly capitalism for the government to give tax breaks to companies who outsource our jobs?" Whether tax breaks are given or not has absolutely nothing to do with capitalism. Right or wrong, it is a decision by the government to promote business and economic growth through tax relief. Business owners will do what is best for their company. That is capitalism.

It is capitalism to achieve the highest profit for your company. Companies are in business to make money. Nothing more. If they make more money by shifting the workforce overseas, that is what they will do. Welcome to global economics in a free-market society.

No, it is called capitalism, Comrade.

[spin control] Brown may have made mistakes, but it was Bush's fault that the mistakes were made. [/spin control]

It is amazing. The lefties B word that he is not connected enough with the situation, then B word that he is trying to connect with the situation. It is no wonder you continue to lose elections.

You mean that we should privatize what is currently run by the government, because the goverment solution goes well beyond what it should provide, costing the taxpayers too much money? Sounds like using government as a solution is a bad idea. Hmmm...where have I heard that concept before...