KRC

I thought it was "why no love for Kobe scoring 81?"

If you want a response to a question, try phrasing it in English.

Why did we pay attention to Saddam? He didn't score 81 points against the Raptors. Neither did that Osama fellow.

Gee...I wonder who that would be...

..and I voiced my opinion. Regardless of people's (notice the proper spelling of people) opinions on the war, you NEVER stop supporting the men and women risking their lives for your freedom. You're a POS.

You dare criticize someone who has the guts to fight for your right to express your man-love for Kobe? You are a $@&*ing POS!!

Somebody who finally gets it. Nice job!!

Kobe is so awesome that he has single-handedly carried his team to a third place standing in a five team division.

How many times did Kobe win MVP in championship series? Jordan won it all six times that he participated. How about Kobe? Oh, that is right. The MVP's went to Shaq.

Kobe couldn't carry Jordan's jock.

Maybe you should ask it a few hundred more times.

Kinda looks like it. Of course, I think you still need another 40 posts discussing it. I don't think you posted this on the Consumer Forum yet.

My thoughts and prayers are with all of you during this tough time.

It is great to hear that she has options to pick the school she wants. Best of luck to her!!

Pay no attention to the black helicopters following you.

...and in one of your pro-union rants, didn't you argue that unions were necessary to prevent management from forcing people to work long hours?

Voters win-win formula: 1. Vote for neither the Republicans nor Democrats. 2. Repeat step 1.

Since I did not want to ruin Mark VI's football thread with a union rant, you mentioned that you were forced to work mandatory overtime during the Bills-Raiders game? I thought you were a member of a union to prevent you working long hours. Isn't that one of the arguments used for why unions are so important, so that you are not forced by management to work longer hours?

I thought that too. How do they plan on responding with nuclear weapons, if not militarily?

I was in college. A guy down the hall was an obnoxious a-hole and was a huge Raiders fan (yeah, I know, redundant). All week, he was talking trash about how the Raiders were going to kick the Bills' arse. It was nauseating. That was, until the game. Things were pretty quiet from his room that day. Being the nice guy that I am, I made sure to go down to his room after every score to offer my condolences. He was not happy.

If I understand your point correctly, SCOTUS forbids warrantless phonetaps of people like Timothy McVeigh, since he is strictly a domestic terrorist. The gray area arises if he were to have contact with foreigners?* *I know that he did have contact with foreigners, but I am just looking at the issue of U.S. citizens performing terrorist attacks in the U.S. seemingly independent of foreign intervention or assistance.

I think Ramius is referring to the fact that he will need to dump good players in order to get under the cap. The team is finally doing well and they will need to get rid of the people who made the team good. I do not think that Ramius was referring to Snyder losing overall revenue.

What...no pics of the doc?

I didn't waste my time with the hearings either, since it is more about the Senators than it is about the nominee.