40 times....ha! year after year, countless GM's and Scouts tell us that 40's are overrated (ESPECIALLY IF WE ARE TALKING ABOUT .3 SECONDS), and yet here we are, year after year, placing 40 times under 4.5 as the highest degree of performance evaluation.
Tell me, how many people can tell the difference between .43 and .75? If you can't run a good route, can't get seperation to beat press coverage, and you can't catch the damn ball, don't have good balance, can't see all that well, are a pu$$y who's afraid to take a hit, then what good does a blink of an eye do ya?
If the 4.43 is so much better than say 4.60, why the hell isn't Roscoe Parrish having a better year than Wes Welker in 07?
enough with the 40 stuff.