FireChan

Aaron Besecker ‏@AaronBesecker 5m5 minutes ago [Patrick Kane case] Sedita: "There are significant material inconsistencies between the complainant's accounts and those of other witnesses Aaron Besecker ‏@AaronBesecker 4m4 minutes ago More from DA: DNA results lend no corroboration whatsoever to complainants's claim of penetration, a required element of proof for rape chg

No, "Super High Me" was on TV and they forgot to go out to vote.

How could I argue the offense is worse this year if it hadn't happened yet? And we both know you don't ignore me.

Fair enough on the tests. I actually wasn't going to bring up the transitional fossils, as I do know that fossilization itself is such a rare process. And I knew I sorta shot myself in the foot early when I brought up the theory of gravity, because even with my rudimentary quantum physics knowledge, I know that gravity/general relativity is screwed up. Isn't it theorized that the there are gravitons(?) or something like that, but they aren't really real particles, and something to do with Planck? My overarching point in regards to speciation and macroevolution was that you have these folks who are either not well-versed in taxonomy nor evolutionary studies. Which is why some of them are not believers. They say things like, we've never seen a monkey turn into a human, or something along those lines. They are the ones who see speciation as a punctuation. They are the ones who claim we can't know what has or will happen over half a billion years. It has nothing to do with their deductive reasoning, moreso their ignorance, of which I've seen hundreds of men of science also fall victim.

We had almost the exact same injuries last season.

Mettenberger slings it though jb.

Genius is TYTT I think. Wrights knee is tight, but he's not out. Mariota loves him as his #1 target though.

Kendall Wright for CJ2K

I'm pretty sure what Jenny did with Forrest in her dorm room was really taking advantage of him, so I went with B.

My understanding of reproducibility is that being able to reproduce a study is necessary to prove the validity of a result. IE you can drop an apple and it will always fall towards the center of gravity on earth for the misnamed "law" of gravity. The observations you speak of, to the best of my knowledge, only apply to the change in allele frequencies of populations. They may point to a gradual change in species, but they are not indicative of primordial ooze-to-humans type of macroevolution, which I assume is what most religious folks object to. And as I'm sure you're aware, the whole species concept is fiercely debated in scientific communities between splitters(?) and lumpers(?) IIRC. Carson, for example, believes in microevolution but not macroevolution.

Gotcha, I've just never heard it used that way.

Tell me, where have we reproduced or witnessed macroevolution?

Macro evolution? No.

Evolution is a theory, not a fact. You are pretending that denying evolution is like denying gravity. It isn't. What is the difference between someone who denies climate change and evolution because they think it's bogus, and the ones who deny climate change and evolution because they think it's bogus and goes against their religion? I am asking for a functional difference. The answer is.....nothing.

No one is saying the offense wasn't bad. I just think there's a difference between bad and historically bad. The defense vs Brady this year was historically bad, because he set historical records against us. It wasn't historically bad vs the Giants.

I don't have an agenda. If the defense keeps this up, would you call it "historically bad," because we'll look back at it in ten years and it was the reason we didn't make the postseason? I don't think you would. "Agenda" indeed.

He does. He hired Roman, who has brought us from the 26th ranked offense to the 24th ranked offense. "Turnaround," indeed. Lol, "historically bad" means we'll look back in history? I love these new definitions.

Jax looked winnable. No guarantees.

Denying Darwin's theory of evolution has no bearing on ability to govern. Who cares? Do we make policy based on what's going to happen a million or 100 million years from now?

History over merit, Tom. Don't you know it's 2015? http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/11/04/justin-trudeau-cabinet_n_8471274.html?12313 Lori Ewing Verified account ‏@Ewingsports 25m25 minutes ago Why was gender balance so important to you? Trudeau: "Because it's 2015." 50 retweets 48 likes The new West.

Who hired Schwartz? And the offense was not "historically bad." Words mean things.

No, it's about their starting positions.

It depends. If our defense has one good half, or a good game, no. If our defense plays very well for the rest of the season? Yes. The same folks who preach patience with Rex are the same ones who will be quick to crown him and make "I told you so" posts on the first 3 and out. It's the exact same thing with EJ. Say, "we need to be patient," then call out the "haters" when he completes his first pass. Fingers crossed Rex gets it together and strings together 3-4 wins. We need it.

Actually I'm arguing against the point that it was "all EJ's fault and Jackonsville didn't really win, EJ lost." But your dedication to being incorrect is admirable.