Wayne Arnold

^^Thinks completion percentage is an accurate measurement of throwing accuracy^^

Yes, absolutely. "Snowflakes" applies to both sides of the political spectrum. . I lean to the left, personally. I'm just anti-fake-outrage.

If anyone wants to see how bad Allen's supporting cast in 2017 was (both his teammates and the offensive coaches) just watch the Oregon game. 1. An OC incapable of scheming receivers open 2. Young and talent-challenged receivers incapable of getting open individually against Oregon players 3. OLine incapable of blocking a 4 man pash rush 4. No running game Any single one of the top prospects in this year's class in the same position would have taken a dump on the field. Most NFL starting QB's as well.

I've seen quite a few people on Twitter who were/are (fake) outraged about the then-15 year old's tweets.

The nerd experts - aka the bloggers and tweeters who never watch football but gather all of the statistics and think they mean something.

Only the snowflakes are bent out of shape about it.

Why? Beane already said that they would have chosen Allen even if they played in a dome.

And yet the Cardinals had Allen graded out as the #1 QB. Go figure.

He's the Seahawks's Director of Pro Personnel so yeah probably.

The 4:00 minute mark is the epitome of Josh Allen's 2017 season at Wyoming.

I'm never serious. However, these days the most successful quarterbacks have 20 year careers.

Bills are looking for a 4th QB for training camp. Bring him in.

He's being blackballed by NFL owners, obviously. #collusion

Amazing arm talent, world-class athleticism and great character and work ethic sounds increasingly desperate?

The head coach and offensive coordinator left North Dakota State when Wentz was a sophomore - before Wentz ever even started a game there. I'll let you all decide what that says about the intelligence and wisdom of Allen's Wyoming coaches.

Where does the ACP account for crappy, outdated passing offense and wide receivers who can't get open.

That's great. But not everyone formed their opinion before the draft. Many wait until after the draft to study players. No, that's not context. Just more random numbers.

You're so wise and impartial!

The analytical writers know the what, but have no idea how to explain the why. It looks to me as if they're making predictions based on numbers but completely ignoring context. They're comparing the completion percentage of a guy at Wyoming to a guy at Oklahoma, which is absolutely absurd. College stats are more about the offensive system than the quarterback.

Yep, terrible.

Marrone loves having a crappy quarterback. That way he can always be praised for exceeding expectations.

That wasn't an extension. It was a paycut.

Yep. They say it's easier to reign in an overly-aggressive quarterback than it is to attempt to convince a tentative one to take more chances.