Jump to content

34-78-83

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,192
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 34-78-83

  1. The thought that they disagree at all is completely fabricated. Again no evidence of that anywhere. They use a committee approach. Fans everywhere are building stories and theories off of false assumptions that these guys disagree with each other in some sort of problem manner.
  2. Since you're all there already, there is no valid evidence of DW not liking TT... Let alone evidence of a rift between DW and the coaching staff...take away the speculation articles and this stuff came from thin air.
  3. After perusing all of the Bills forums and message boards out there quite a few years ago now, i found that TBD had a significantly lower percentage of !@#$tards as compared to the other sites. It is the internet after all, however, and the best one can hope for out there is about a 20% !@#$tard rate, which TBD maintains pretty steadily. Unfortunately I do also have to be honest and admit that the BBMB appeared to have one of the higher !@#$tard rates of all the available sources at the time of my searches. This conclusion came after a couple months (off and on) of study at the time. By no means is this necessarily a reflection on any of those who may have migrated from there recently, as I am sure there are also many quality posters that will add insight here. This is just more of a plea to keep our !@#$tard rate at it's nice and steady low(ish) rate and to think twice/type once.
  4. I agree regarding Lorax
  5. You have a good grasp of the cap and real decisions teams have to make because of it. Not that I always agree with it, but the Bills strategy of draft a corner early, let him walk upon 2nd contract has clearly been a conscious effort for a number of years that they like to utilize to play the numbers as you well describe.
  6. It doesn't and he won't be (this season). All it takes is some basic logic. No need for folks to complicate it in their heads. I'll take bets though if someone would like to lose some throw-away cash
  7. Reading your stuff should be mandatory. Well done. I always learn something.
  8. I want him to think that. That's the right mindset for him. He's probably really the 3rd best but that's fine
  9. What are you , 80? TT a punk?? LMFAO you idiot
  10. McDermott looked slow and stiff in the senior bowl. I like Davis. The Sammy comments are so ( as badol puts it) beaten down bills fan its not even funny. Not even worth it.
  11. Yep that required speed, length, and hip swivel can usually only be found in rd 1. Obviously there are variables like Gilmore being an FA and A Williams a hit away from retirement as well...
  12. You know already that a db at 10 would make a ton of sense. Not that I would like to see that as my 1st option, but don't just dread the idea because that's what Bill from NYC has always done, cuz that's what it would seem like and you are more football savvy than that.
  13. There's something about Boulware the lb from Clemson's instincts. Like him a lot. No idea where he's projected.
  14. All of that ^^^ .. I don't think they'll end up being dumb with it but if they are, all fans can do is have fingers crossed on whomever they draft at QB being good as a rookie. Yikes.
  15. Osweiler is hella-bad!!! Slowest draw in football. A drop of QB talent on that team would sure help. What an amazing D they have. And when Watt comes back look out!
  16. Dak is a 1 to 2 read QB right now. He's a leader and has had a great season behind a great Oline. He may turn into a all of famer. But right now he's a one to 2 read Qb on most plays. Dak generally has atleast 4 seconds to throw on most drop backs. There is a different look to a guy (Brady, Rogers, Ryan, Brees) that could play any where.
  17. I don't have those answers just like none of us do. All you can do is use common sense, logic and remove bias (bad or good). Agendas will ALWAYS allow you to see exactly what you already determined was true, even if it;'s completely wrong. My post was more of a warning or disclaimer to use when viewing an All 22.
  18. One of the biggest myths that creates all this division on many NFL football players (TT not withstanding) on internet message boards is: That having access to the all 22 gives you all the ammo for your answers. It doesn't of course. You don't know the blocking scheme, you don't know the pre-snap reads and blitz or coverage adjustments dictated by the scheme, you don't know the post snap progression order of route reading (ex. High to Low, Low to High, Primary receiver, Check down option), you don't know the specific route tree that is used for the scheme in general, and you don't know the injury status of the players participating on either side of the ball (coaching mismatches or guys to avoid). The all 22 gives certainly gives you more than the broadcast (safety positioning, etc.) but it's not the end all be all when the eyes watching it don't know anything about all the details I mentioned above. It's a great tool to have for us fans but also dangerous for making assumptions.
  19. That's a cool set up for sure!
  20. Please block me already. I'm aware of your schtick.
  21. Mind numbing to where I'll skip on going to any games next year.
×
×
  • Create New...