-
Posts
69,600 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by B-Man
-
New Marxist Attack: Amy Coney Barrett's Husband
B-Man replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Breaking: Justice’s husband is a lawyer who represents clients in cases. https://x.com/mattdizwhitlock/status/1795819816139509840 . -
The American Media Should Not Be Trusted
B-Man replied to SCBills's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
-
.
-
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
-
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
B-Man replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Worth the three minutes to remind yourselves. Americans will never be the same after this particular psych-op. The government lies changed us forever -
Democrats, they just can't help themselves when it comes to lying. Summarizing for those just tuning in: Democrats write and enact Ohio’s ballot access law in 2009. Democratic secretary of state approves it. Democratic governor signs it. Democrats in 2024 forget their own law and schedule their convention too late to comply with it. Republicans remind them. Democrats accuse Republicans of incompetence, political tricks & threatening democracy. This is politics in 2024, folks
-
BASED.
-
DOJ Tracked 'Moms for Liberty' As a Hate Group, According to Uncovered Emails By Brandon Morse The Department of Justice saw fit to monitor the goings on within the group "Moms for Liberty," a grassroots organization designed to protect children and schools from radical leftist, especially when it came to matters of sex and LGBT indoctrination. According to the Daily Wire, the DOJ’s Community Relations Service (CRS) tracked the group alongside actual hate groups such as the Ku Klux Klan, as internal documents show. The emails that detail the DOJ's monitoring of Moms for Liberty were revealed thanks to a FOIA request from America First Legal on behalf of the Daily Wire. The CRS is tasked with “preventing and responding to community tensions and hate crimes, bias, bullying, and discrimination,” and tracked Moms for Liberty through Google and LexisNexis alerts. The Daily Wire reported that the DOJ initially tried to keep these documents hidden by ignoring a FOIA request but was ultimately forced to thanks to a lawsuit by America First Legal. {snip} Moms for Liberty is far from being a hate group, and mostly consists of actual parents who are just looking out for their children's best interests. Oftentimes this doesn't line up with what the state thinks is best and as such, the attacks must commence. But one thing is for sure. If the government is this interested in a group interested in protecting kids from radical leftism, then they must be over the target. https://redstate.com/brandon_morse/2024/05/29/doj-tracked-moms-for-liberty-as-a-hate-group-according-to-uncovered-emails-n2174812 .
-
Talk about the height of pandering — he even pulled out something like the "I have a black friend" move. What? Please give me your vote because I stood for a few minutes next to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin? Biden is just shameless. That's like what he said about Barack Obama being "the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man." The crazy hit its apex when Biden even accused Trump of pandering, always projecting on Trump what he himself is guilty of. https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/05/29/biden-remarks-in-philly-n2174813
-
Push play. . . . . . . . he can't be out in public.
-
It can't be laughed away anymore. I predict that President Trump may get as high as 33%, while in the past it was around 5 - 10 %
-
Previous And Ongoing Election Rigging and Interference.
B-Man replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
REMINDER: -
3 years. Why WaPo Waited So Long to Publish the Alito Flag Story JAZZ SHAW The media has been trying to gin up a lot of mileage regarding a report from the New York Times about an American flag being flown upside down outside of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito's home. Looking further into the details, that wasn't something that happened recently. In fact, the photo of the flag was taken more than three years ago, shortly after the Capitol Hill riots. So how did it take so long for us to hear about it, assuming you're even concerned to begin with? As it turns out, the Washington Post had the photo and the story almost immediately. But as the Associated Press pointed out yesterday, the editors at the Post opted not to run the story. This all sounds like much ado over (almost) nothing, but given all of the current antipathy on the left toward the conservative members of the court, we're probably going to keep hearing about it, so we should dig a bit further into the details. This episode raises questions about how the media has handled this story at various stages and whether or not the underlying incident was really all that big of a deal to begin with. The WaPo claims that they originally examined the story but concluded that "it appeared Alito’s wife was responsible and that it was not clear the neighborhood argument was over politics." But if that was true three years ago, then how did the New York Times determine it was an appropriate story to run now? The Gray Lady is claiming that they only acquired the photo "recently." Does that sound very likely? If someone has what appears to be a potentially hot bit of gossip about a Supreme Court justice and it went to the Post, how would it not also be slipped to the Times? I would argue that both of the papers had the story three years ago, but elected to keep it in their back pockets. But now that we're drawing close to a presidential election where Joe Biden is trailing and trying to warn people about the potential of Donald Trump appointing more justices in the mold of Alito, the MSM probably sees more usefulness in putting the story out there. The AP piles on a bit by posing the question, "Should a public official’s family be held to the same standards as that official themselves?" Whether Alito or his wife hung the flag like that probably doesn't matter all that much. If Alito did hang it himself in sympathy for the January 6 rioters, then he's making up a story now to cover his tracks. If his wife really did hang it, unless he never went out of his front door, he would have seen it. If it bothered him that much he could have taken it down, but apparently he didn't. More at the link: https://hotair.com/jazz-shaw/2024/05/29/why-wapo-waited-so-long-to-publish-the-alito-flag-story-n3789238 .
-
-
-
And the 2024 Race Begins
B-Man replied to The Frankish Reich's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits