Cynical

Have you read all of his posts? IMO, he's quite clear in his position. Here some snippets: Don't know if people watched the same video that I saw, but to me it was clear that she was the instigator. (I think his position is pretty clear) She then takes another step to the left ensuring more intentional contact with him, (more intentional contact, implying she's doing it on purpose) But let's not pretend that he wasn't provoked not just by some sassy language. (Yes, cause words themselves have never set off a bar fight) She barrels into the guy on her right at the bar (1. He calls that a "barrel". Please, she touches him, even unintentionally bumps the guy, but "barrel"? 2. So what. What does that have to do with her confrontation with the QB who was behind her and on her left? Unless he's trying to prove and reinforce the woman's aggressive and instigating behavior) she's certainly keen on making sure he's aware that she's there (She says something to the QB after being bumped by him, so yeah, she's purposely being confrontational and aggressive) but let's not give blondie a pass for creating the situation. (Again, I think he is stating his position pretty clearly) Yes, he admits Johnson lost control, but apparently, that was caused by her physical instigating behavior, and not because he was a drunken idiot who reacted poorly to being insulted. So if I am not comprehending something, consider me a sponge. Learn me.

Yeah, you're right. I also forgot to add where A bulldozes C with the express intent of having B bump into A, so A can turn around and confront B. Therefore, it's not Bs fault, because A was the aggressive one. Also, I have never denied she said something to him. IMO, his reaction had more to do with what she said, than her fist.

Yes, please do. Yeah, she just crushes that poor guy. I am shocked he held his composure. Take your own advice. Watch the video again. Not helping your position at all. I am going to ask for clarification: Example: Person A is standing somewhere. Person B comes up behind person A B bumps/jostles A. A informs B they were there first. B shoves A. It's A fault for being shoved because they created the confrontation by informing B they were there first?

From what I can see, her step to the left was nothing more than an intentional step to the left looking for space. That step was being blocked by the QB's right arm where he was grabbing the bar. As for the cocking her right arm, take a closer look at the fist. The thumb is sticking out, like she's trying to point behind her. Compare that with her left arm when she throws the punch, the thumb is down.

Yes. It was stated as such right in the first 2 sentences. "All NFL coaches want to set up their opponent. Here's an example of how new Bills offensive coordinator Greg Roman did it in San Francisco with the 49ers."

Maybe the fact that some of the Fox news idiots and some in the GOP were trying to claim the attack had nothing to with race, and trying to imply it was a hate crime based on religion. Good thing those gangs are well armed in Chicago. I would hate to see the carnage if they were not.

No love for Rowdy Roddy Piper and his Piper's Pit? One of the all time great bad guys/antagonists. https://youtu.be/x_9ByHQ6PAY

UConn and Central Florida have a "new" rivalry. Unfortunately , UConn HC Diaco did not bother to ask anybody at the University of Central Florida if they wanted to be a part of it. Linky

He's not only weak on QB history, he seems to be weak on Raven history, When the Ravens won their first SB, Tony Banks was actually the starter when the regular season opened up. Trent Dilfer was the back up. Granted, Banks was benched because of poor play, but it is another example of the back up QB taking over for the starter and leading the team to a SB.

Same can be said of the REM song.

Instead of parking in the street, park on his damn lawn. I am sure you will get some kind of reaction from him.

Clue given: http://content.usatoday.com/_common/_scripts/big_picture.aspx?width=490&height=544&storyURL=/sports/football/nfl/2010-12-03-the-bell-tolls_N.htm&imageURL=http://i.usatoday.net/sports/_photos/2010/12/02/hanksx-large.jpg Merton Hank's TD dance: https://youtu.be/nZHZZdSaSPc

Jesus H. ... http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2015/5/28/8682651/big-12-rule-replays

Right up until somebody can prove diminished capacity, then it will be on.

Wife and I are watching this also, but I am leery of M Night Shyamalan being the executive producer. Not a big fan of his work, but keeping my fingers crossed he's just a producer, and nothing more. One show I never see mentioned in these threads: Wentworth on Netflix. An Aussie TV series about female prisoners, far darker than Orange is the New Black.

That law probably is tort reform.

That is correct. However, what Pats** fans are choosing to ignore is that fake weed is not banned or prohibited in the NFL. Sent from my XT1080 using Forum Fiend v1.3.1.

Yeah, I am still regretting not getting Johnny Train wreck. I am so done with this team. Sent from my XT1080 using Forum Fiend v1.3.1.

1 poster stated he thought Johnson had a pretty good game. Otherwise, I do not think anybody is actually arguing Johnson was a good QB. 1. We will disagree on Flutie winning the Titans playoff game. 2. I could argue Flutie had to throw the ball almost 400 yards, because he kept turning the ball over. 3. Reed did not take the penalty on the final drive. That would have been the drive before, where the Bills still walked away with a FG. The final drive ended when Flutie fumbled the ball. AGAIN. 4. Reed is the goat of the game because of a penalty and/or fumble? Why not Moulds? Heck, he fumbled once and took a 15yd face mask. Well, the face mask did come as he was tackling the Dolphins player who picked off Flutie in the Miami endzone. Reeds penalty - team still scores 3. Fluties screw up - team scores 0. But its Reeds fault. Whatever.

Flutie take a sack for a safety? Maybe, maybe not. More than likely he would have been too busy coughing up the ball to other team so they can score TD's: "Doug Flutie sacked by Ray Mickens for -5 yards. Doug Flutie fumbles (forced by Ray Mickens), recovered by Eric Ogbogu at BUF-0, touchdown." In case you were wondering: 11/21/1999 at the Jets. Interesting enough, the Bills had three turnovers in that game. I just posted one. Care to guess which player(s) did the other two? Here's a hint: Comp-Att-Yd-TD-INT / 22-40-220-1-2 Yep, another 1 TD / 3 TO game for Flutie. Another game lost. It was almost 4 turnovers, but the ball bounced out of bounds: "Doug Flutie up the middle for 23 yards (tackle by Victor Green). Doug Flutie fumbles (forced by Victor Green), ball out of bounds at NYJ-22" Noticed where the ball was at - The Jets 22. Two plays later, from the Jets 10 yard line, Flutie threw a pick. This was hashed out 15+ years ago. Let it go. Accept it. Flutie was a mediocre QB at best. For all of the great plays he did to keep a drive alive, a few plays later, he would do something completely boneheaded, like force a throw into double/triple coverage while a receiver would be wide open on the other side of the field.

Wow, talk about irony ... Then you have the audacity to blame Reed and Moulds (the "real goats"). Why? Because they both fumbled. Yet, you ignore Flutie turning the ball over 3 times by himself. 1 TD, 3 Turnovers. That's reality. That is a piss poor ratio. That is a game losing ratio. Here's a coincidence. Fluties best year in the NFL just so happens to take place during one of the most horrendous years of officiating in the NFL.

Now all we need to do is teach it to make microwave popcorn.

Either you haven't spent enough time here, or I have spent way too much time here, because it made sense to me.

Flutie was fantastic in that game. Well, except for the 3 fumbles (2 lost) and the pick he threw. So, yes, Moulds lost a ball and Reed lost a ball, and those were bad. But Flutie gave it away 3 times. That's more than Reed and Moulds combined.

No, when the poster said "Stewart will be missed", your only response was a question mark. Nothing more. Whether or not Stewart is funny, is a matter of opinion. Whether or not Stewart will be missed, is not. Unless you really think you have a shot of convincing BarleyNY that he will not miss Stewart. Assumptions and conclusions were drawn. By you. You assumed the statement "Stewart will be missed" implied "by everybody", including you.