ny33

There aren't, but Hogan has played for four teams. I don't think that he has developmental potential. Hopefully there is a wideout who can play special teams adequately, and has some potential, available as of this round of cuts.

I didn't see the team enough during the preseason. Did Graham get any time at safety and, if so, is he considered a backup to Searcy over Meeks, assuming that Duke Williams steps in for Aaron Williams?

Hopefully there is a better special teams player available in free agency or on the waiver wire. I don't think that Hogan has any value as a wide receiver.

I don't see how Chris Hogan is more valuable to the team than Graham.

I expect Chicago to cover, and expect the game will be under. Chicago 23, Buffalo 16.

Do you think that Whaley is going to read this- and consider signing Incognito- because you created a thread on Two Bills Drive?

1) There is already a thread on this. 2) How many times are you going to conflate "our" and "are"?

Did anyone watch Orton last season and, if so, have a critique of his play for Dallas? I'll try to watch NFL Game Rewind when I have time this week.

I think that Pryor has better options. He has a chance to be the clear-cut #2 in, I think, San Francisco, Tennessee, and maybe a few other places.

Jake Delhomme was decent. Dave Krieg was ok.

This is a beautiful couplet.

If you're going to steal Buffalo Rumblings' projection- at least you admit that it isn't yours- cite them/Brian Galliford as your source. Come on.

This is plagiarism. Use double quotation marks around the text that isn't yours and single quotation marks for quotes within the text. Your post, as written, does not distinguish between what you pulled from Wikipedia and what you wrote yourself.

This article lists Manny Lawson at OLB, which is probably inaccurate.

How can one "wreck" havoc?

Barr had 13.5 sacks his junior year and 10 sacks this year.

Russ Brandon, I think, would be the first to go under new ownership.

No, he wasn't. Richardson averaged 3.6 y.p.c. in 2012, and 3.4 y.p.c. in the two games he played in 2013 in Cleveland. He only had 36 first downs on 267 rushes in 2012, so it's not as if his low y.p.c. was a result of Richardson's being used on (x) down-and short. He is a bust. I will always be amazed by the fact that Cleveland got a first for him.

Cleveland claims that Kansas City was going to take Manziel at 23, so it's conceivable that Smith will walk.

If Crossman fails again, and Marrone doesn't fire him, Marrone should go. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/football-insider/wp/2014/05/13/vote-next-week-on-expanding-nfl-playoffs-possible-but-unlikely/ It's far more likely that playoff expansion starts in 2015, not this season.

Kenny Stills had 641 yards and 5 TDs as a rookie. Colston slowed down last year. Their other receivers aren't very good. Stills' success dispels your redshirt argument; that, combined with the fact that this is a relatively weak WR corps for the team, means that Cooks is likely to put up big numbers. He will see the field most downs. Oh, and Colston himself had 1,038 yards and 8 TDs his rookie year.

I would guess that Atlanta would have trade down to the ninth pick. I don't think Tampa, Minnesota, or any team trading up to eight (as Cleveland did) would have done so for Matthews.

The last wide receiver to win rookie of the year was Percy Harvin with the 2009 Vikings. He had Brett Favre at quarterback. I like E.J. and think he can make significant improvements this year, but I think that Brandin Cooks, with Drew Brees at quarterback and a depleted W.R. corps in New Orleans, is likely to put up bigger numbers than Watkins. Williams and Woods, I think, will likely have similar receiving stats to Watkins this year.

Trent was ok. He had, maybe, four good games. Edwards never put back-to-back quality games together.

I never said that you did. I don't think that the players would have voted him into the top-hundred, though, and rightfully so.