Jauronimo

Thats how most people join cults. Congrats!

I eagerly wait similar articles as the offseason drags on like "Why the Bills Should Consider Trading Hogan but Ultimately Shouldn't go Through With It", and "Should the Bills Try to Trade Up in the 3rd Round of the Draft?".

The article is beyond dumb because it fails to address why we should trade him? What would the Bills be trying to accomplish by trading EJ? QB is the biggest need. EJ's contract isn't holding us back. There is no QB controversy in Buffalo so its not like he and Cassel and anyone else we might bring in cannot co-exist. The market for EJ is soft so the type of consideration we'd receive in any trade is modest. So why would we trade him? That article was pointless.

Finally! A detailed breakdown of a question no one is asking: Should the Bills trade EJ to ????? for ?????? because of..... uhhh ???? ? And the answer is no, not yet, but they'd be wise to gauge ???????'s interest.

I get the impression that much of the country first heard about the world's largest religion back in September of 2001. I have friends telling me that i shouldn't go to Turkey because of vague memories involving headlines about honor killings. "Some girl got her head cut off there!" I'm about as worried about being decapitated as a I am about a forced clitorectomy.

Cancun is haram.

That isn't cynical.

One the sweetest memories in recent history, and a game that I was old enough to actually appreciate, was the second half comeback in 2011 as the Bills erased a 21 point deficit to finally beat the Patriots.

His teammate Doug Gilmour was pretty damn good too and a complete player. I was rooting for those Leafs teams as well in 93' and 94'. Back then Toronto was in the West so there really wasn't much reason to hate the despicable Leafs.

You're an idiot. People who view themselves as passive entities totally at the mercy of the whims of fortune and fate are losers and deserve whatever they get. Taking ownership of your situation and dictating your own destiny doesn't have a political affiliation.

A citizen having little understanding of the how the court system works is unreasonable? Next you'll say the existence of stupidity isn't reasonable. It just isn't reasonable that there are stupid people or those ignorant of the burden of proof in criminal trials.

You're an excellent paster. Anyone who says otherwise is just looking for a fight.

Do you know when you'll know that you asked the wrong question? When your hamster's head is rolling down a flight of stairs. That's when.

There are 1,001 different charts with every set of draft outcomes within the bounds of the previously determined lottery weightings. The selection of 4 numbered balls will determine which chart is pulled. That chart lists the draft order.

You already posted exactly how the lottery works with an explanation as clear as day but have asked how the lottery works three times since. I hope for your sake that you're trolling.

I think he knows but keeps asking "How DOES it work?" for his own amusement, like the guy who kept asking about whether Pegula could buy the Bills since he already owned the Sabres. Not my cup of tea, but some people seem to find this gag funny. Most concise explanation I've found of the methodology:

18-6

You don't even know what the toddler did, tough guy!

I'll take McDavid for no other reason than the premier junior leagues produce more NHL talent. EDIT: Looked through the top 60 point leaders in the NHL and found a number of NCAA players: Pavelski, Pacioretty, Toews, Jaden Schwartz, Gaudreau, Parise, Blake Wheeler, Turris, Kessel, Backes, Oshie, Van Riemsdyk, probably missed a few others. Decent representation considering many players on the list are European and Russian and stayed home rather than choose either college or junior hockey in North America. I think my original opinion is outdated.

http://imgur.com/gallery/aKrFc Inspiration for days.

Anything post 1936? http://www.genetics.org/content/175/3/975.full

I didn't get into the details of the agreement or the White House's intent in entering into this agreement, but I am aware that there is an agreement and furthermore, I'm prepared to opine on the likelihood that this agreement was likely the only measure preventing imminent global thermonuclear war.

Criticism is likely unwarranted since the agreement has likely prevented a likely nuclear holocaust in the near future, most likely.

Physics is backed with evidence which is then used to form theories which explain observed phenomenon. When there is no absolutely no empirical evidence to suggest that a particular scientist fudged experiments how the !@#$ is it likely? Ostensibly plausible or even possible does NOT equal likely. I don't know how many times I can explain this to you.

Really? How likely is it that Mendel fudged multiple experiments and what do you base this opinion on? Your whole f@#$ing world view is predicated upon use of the words "clearly" and "likely" to back specious arguments.