Jauronimo

There's that word again. You were arguing that a confederate flag was a likely enabler in a specific hate crime. Now a confederate flag is a likely "contributor" of general racism. See the subtle difference?

No, I haven't suggested any such thing. But apparently you're arguing that a confederate flag in South Carolina is the root of all racism or at the very least, the enabler. A piss poor attempt even by your standards.

Its not appropriate if......wait for it......it isn't likely. Concepts, or relationships in this instance, typically aren't likely when you pull them out of your a@#. When you suggest that this little monster was enabled by a confederate flag you have gone totally off the reservation. Nothing in the fact set suggests that the flag was a factor. Therefore, there is absolutely no reason to think that there is even the loosest of connection between what transpired in that Church and what flag is waving in the capitol, let alone actually enabled which suggests a significant influence. I believe that meets the criteria of completely unlikely. I believe you can just as easily argue that the bills 15 year playoff drought was an enabling factor given the absence of anything backing that theory. Even the most superficial analysis of your premise reveals it to be total BS backed with nothing but your own liberal and convenient use of the word "likely". Deja vu.

Likely. If you're spit nonsense out of a certain orifice at least back it up with something authoritative like "clearly" or "obviously". Likely??? Grow a pair, already

You missed that I didn't quote you, but rather quoted the article you linked. You missed that the article mistakenly refers to OBJ as ODB. You missed that ODB was a famous rapper and the reference to some of his more famous lyrics. Finally, you missed that ODB is dead and about as peaceful as can be at this point. Its safe to say that the only thing getting under whats left of his skin is maggots.

Of course you do. He was likely on the fence about committing mass murder until he likely remembered that the state flies a confederate flag and that likely sealed the decision, in all likelihood. If SC flew a different flag whether the jolly roger, ISIS, or the union jack, its unlikely this heinous crime ever occurs.

Does anyone else want to take this one?

Last I knew, ODB (yeah, you know him) was about as low key as it gets.

Explain.

My PMs are a goldmine (once you filter through Beerball's daily affirmations of what a bad person I am). Heres another good one.

Its a good one but can it really compare to this?

I would consider getting both counsel and judge names totally incorrect but never consistently incorrect. If the honorable Bryan Fitzgerald is presiding over the case, you're in luck.

Has anyone noticed a striking correlation between the quality of the poster and usernames with variation of "dog"?

discussion of moats as a means of data security and radiation containment changes in the gravitational constant due to geology the mean expected outcome of rolling a die do your own homework, Sue Exhibit B pixyland.org defer to the authority of El Pegual

Mere weeks till camp and Hogan still can't figure out the electric slide.

Here is a wikipedia link that discusses torture. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torture I hope this helps.

Thats totally uncalled for.

Here is some fun reading: http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/164325-drafting-small-receivers/page-3 http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/160936-bills-roster-cut-down-to-50-18-then-5-more/page-6 And my personal favorite.... http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/133540-people-act-like-brad-smith-is-some-kind-of-dummy/

More non-sequiturs. Oh, NPR discussed internet trolls? Really? That's interesting because it has !@#$ all to do with your inability to grasp even the most obvious joke which was pointed squarely at Oliver and equated his brand of humor with means of torture. Funny or not, we can debate, but obvious, it absolutely !@#$ing was. But I should educate myself because of...more non-sequiturs? Insightful as always, birdog.

You just responded to a renowned troll's cheap joke with a total non-sequitur. Every bit of that post is shamefully stupid. From basis for posting (i.e., complete miscomprehension of the 4mer's joke) to your totally asinine point about why Oliver decided not to recite the definition of torture. Could it be because he's a comedian and reciting definitions out the Geneva Convention isn't very entertaining? Lets rehash: 1. missed the joke. 2. non-sequitur. 3. totally !@#$ing stupid point of its own merit.

The depth of your stupidity is unfathomable.

Normally you make it to page 2 before you start flailing wildly and clutching at straws. Thank you for expediting the process.

The genre is irrelevant. These "comedies" in question hardly portray black people in a more positive light than Birth of a Nation. You should probably clarify with Rob where he was going with that comment. I believe Rob's point was whether simply painting your face black is inherently racist. At least I hope that was the question. Maybe I should clarify as well.

Considering he alluded to the history and origin of blackface in the post you just quoted, I'd say you're mistaken.

No. Nada. Nothing. Except for occasionally the joke.