-
Posts
3,524 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Just in Atlanta
-
What's wrong with showing spunk? C'mon, man, would you rather have Dickie J? I want a coach with fire in his belly.
-
No contest. Dodge God made a farmer.
-
Logged in here to see what you cats were saying about the Pro Bowl. I was going to watch until CJ was in, but couldn't even do that. Byrd flubbing an easy tackle in the Red Zone turned me away. Two pages of comments here, with three players in the game. For contrast, Marone's penchant for saying "ya know" got twice as many pages. Yeah, I say there is a better than 75 percent chance we just saw our last one.
-
NFL threatens man who trademarked "Harbowl" last year
Just in Atlanta replied to Fezmid's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Dicks. -
Jamarcus Russell Making a Comeback
Just in Atlanta replied to truth on hold's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Guess the famous CPS--codeine and pastrami sandwich--diet isn't all it's cracked up to be. In all seriousness, how can you play QB at 300 pounds? Or even 275? This is ridiculous. Roethlisberger is 240, and he looks huge. -
The fact he said Marone must fix Fitz makes this analysis moot IMO. The only fixing of Fitz that might be happening--and that's probably less than 50-50--is teaching him how to hold the clipboard properly. I personally see Chip Kelly either tearing it up, or getting blown up. Funny how this guy generates extremes of opinion on both ends. As an analyst with SI, especially one with as little experience as this reporter, I'd temper my grade of a guy whose never even stepped foot in an NFL lockerroom.
-
Tom Brady's Sissy Kick
Just in Atlanta replied to DallasBillsFan1's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I do hate milk with a passion. You are absolutely right! It should have drawn a fine. -
Tom Brady's Sissy Kick
Just in Atlanta replied to DallasBillsFan1's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Last time, a kick should be a penalty. All I'm saying is that it was more dangerous to Brady than Reed. His leg was exposed in the air. I remember when I played soccer as a lad, I slid, attempting to kick the ball. Someone ran into my leg. He was fine. I was in serious pain. -
Tom Brady's Sissy Kick
Just in Atlanta replied to DallasBillsFan1's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Can't believe I'm defending Brady, and I'm really not, because you obviously shouldn't put your leg up, but picture yourself in the following scenario: You're on the ground. You've got the body style of Brady. Ed Reed collides into your leg--full speed--as you're on the ground, motionless. You really saying that's not potentially going to cause serious damage to Brady...more so than Reed? He could've snapped his freaking ankle. I can't believe so many people don't see that. -
Bill Cowher dipping Skoal on set
Just in Atlanta replied to justnzane's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Maybe he swallows. -
Tom Brady's Sissy Kick
Just in Atlanta replied to DallasBillsFan1's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
What ever Reed's weight, he was barreling right at Brady. A collision, IMO, would have hurt Brady more than Reed. It was more stupid than dirty. That's my point. -
Tom Brady's Sissy Kick
Just in Atlanta replied to DallasBillsFan1's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Think people are overreacting here. He had a 300 pound monster barreling in on him. The chance of him getting seriously hurt from that move was substantially higher than the defender. -
Expected Superbowl matchups and winner?
Just in Atlanta replied to Just Jack's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Atlanta, with the best record in the NFL, is getting no love here. Including from me: SF over NE*. -
You're really asking me how political correctness has taken away freedom and free choice? California mandating gay history. Colorodo mandating that private daycare centers must carry dolls that represent at least three different races. A RI town banning daddy-daughter dances. Schools calling Christmas trees holiday trees. Municipalities banning Nativity scenes. Universities banning the word freshman. Universities banning certain words and requiring that students take inclusion training. Kids getting expelled for hugs and drawing guns. Censorship of various books. The Rooney Rule. Do you want more? .
-
Apologies to the OP for being one of the posters who turned a thread about the Hogettes into a debate on political correctness. I have a strong view on this subject, that offense over the name redskin is manufactured, and that people who are offended by a term that mentions someone's skin color are overly sensitive. I also feel political correctness is one of the biggest threats to freedom, as it makes us overly sensitive and prone to collectivism over the individual--I have tens if not hundreds of examples--and that this redskin thing is symbolic of the path we're taking. But I would hope we could be reasonably civil about this.
-
Poll: Should the "Redskins" name be changed?
Just in Atlanta replied to Just in Atlanta's topic in Off the Wall Archives
Please do not respond to others' posts for debate purposes. This is a poll, not a debate. Here's one lively thread for pokin sticks. -
Poll: Should the "Redskins" name be changed?
Just in Atlanta replied to Just in Atlanta's topic in Off the Wall Archives
Hey--just a poll. The sentiment threads will be crucial Bills events only. Hopefully when we search for sentiment, or what ever the term will be, only a few posts will pop up rather than 100s. Not to be sarcastic, but simply because I'm interested in the majority viewpoint here. No illusions here that I'm Zogby. Did I just break my own rule by responding to someone? -
Poll: Should the "Redskins" name be changed?
Just in Atlanta posted a topic in Off the Wall Archives
After some debate in a previous thread about the Skins changing their name, I'm curious: What do the majority of TSW posters think? Just one rule, as with "sentiment" polls in the future: Please do not respond to others' posts. Just vote, and offer your on-topic opinion if you want to. There are many other threads where we can poke sticks in each others' eyes... *Mods: I thought about putting this in PPP, but as this is an NFL policy issue, not a political one, I opted for here. Hope you agree. **For the second question, you can select more than one. -
Now we're getting nasty but I'll bite. You really think hordes of people are offended by the term redskin? In this age when everything is dictated by political correctness, when people are routinely fired for saying ill-advised but harmless off-color jokes, when (read the examples above)? We'd have people boycotting, screaming, marching. It's manufactured.
-
I see your point, but it's manufactured. No one uses that term anymore. If we had a team called the "Darkies", everyone and their moms would be screaming in the street. You don't see that here. Yeah, there are some oversensitive types, but it's mostly intellectual types who overthink **** to the point of exhaustion. If we truly trace the history of words, we'd probably find half of them are offensive to someone. It's not about not changing ways. It's about being afraid of offending anyone. This fear morphs into real life and public policy--not just football--and takes away our common sense to the point of absurdity on a near daily basis.