I love how ESPN gives crappy stories for free and charges for the good ones.
On another note, numerous courts have ruled that posting an article in entirety with the purpose of education/discussion is fair use. I would bank on that being the case even in the case of so-called premium content. It is not a copyright, or as one poster said, a copy write, violation. In my mind, no more so than posting an entire tweet.
Whether it's a violation of TBD, which apparently it is, is another story.
...So now, all the post says is there is a breakdown on this story ESPN wants to charge access to? I think we're taking this copyright thing a little too far.