Wayne Cubed

Michael Jordan effect basically.

Would you like to know my logIn for NFL Rewind? Maybe then you can watch them yourself, again. You would bet big money and be wrong. I watch lots of games. Hence why I have NFL rewind. Not that you'll believe me or I can prove it.

Actually I've watched the games, thanks. Have you? you mean his massive 6 attempts for 17 yards and a TD, gee didn't realize I should put those out there as well.

Uhhhh he's has Tannehill ranked as the 2nd best QB in the AFC East. And this is what he says: "It is incredible the way Tannehill not only has adapted to becoming an NFL quarterback, but simply just a quarterback overall. After all of his time playing wide receiver in college, I wondered if Tannehill could make the rapid transition. Through four games, it seems like he can and has." Yet Tannehill is 1-3 as a starter..... Has 2 Tds to his 6 interceptions.... Has a completion 55.4%.... and has a passer rating of 66.4 which puts him as 2nd to last in the NFL. But yea, he's definietly the 2nd best QB in the AFCE.

Buddy Nix said it best "The guy is a great player, the money he got he's never going to live up to that. Nobody can and you knew that when you did it that it was going to be under the microscope and criticized at every turn. He realizes that and wants to play better and we expect him to. Fans and media have a unique position, that if you sign a guy, you overpaid and he's not worth it and if you don't sign him you're cheap. You're damned if you do and damned if you don't." For years its been Ralph is cheap. Now its the Bills overpaid and he's not worth it. Hilarious.

Except that 2 of those excuses MW never made. Yes after week 1 he complained about hands to the face. He hasn't said anything excuse wise since. The double team, was something the media brought up and evaluated. And again, not once in the article did he use his injury as an excuse.

I'm sorry, maybe I read a different interview, but where in there was he making excuses? Again, the reporter asked about his wrist, he explained what was going on with it. Nothing more. He even went on to say "It comes down to finding a way to do it and try to overlook it. It is a big part of my game and I just have to go out and do it." So basically its not an excuse and shouldn't be used as one. I swear some fans love to hate players.

Haha, wow. Overreact much?

This. Also, some of the responses here are acting like he's making excuses. Which he isn't, at all. The reporter asked him a question, he responded. And what does Ronnie Lott have to do with Mario Williams? Cause he played injured? Well guess what, Mario is playing injured. As previously mentioned, he's a power rusher, basically playing one handed.

I like this post, it was great to read this morning. I grew up watching in the 80s and remember how bad the Bills were before the late 80s early 90s rolled around. In 87' they went 7-8 and there were some terrible, terrible games. They lost 47-6 to the Colts. Then in 88', boom, 12-4 and just missed top seed in the AFC. They also went on to the AFC Championship. Watching the games before the 88' team went to the AFC Championship, you could tell the talent was there, just the results on the field didn't always match.

What if the Patriots* make both field goals? Those were essentially turnovers. That may have made it 14-13 at the half. 3 of the turnovers didn't effect the first half at all. You could play the what if game till your bluefin the face. I like to stick to facts. And the facts are the defense couldn't stop the run all game and in the second half the Patriots* eliminated their mistakes and were able to make drive down the field and score EVERYTIME.

3 things I did differently: 1. I switched beers, mid-game. First half I was drinking Guiness. Well, the Guiness ran out and all that was in the fridge was my wife's Budweiser, so thats what I drank in the second half. Crap beer, turned the Bills play to crap. 2. I watched the game on my laptop. I don't normally do that, I watch it on my TV. 3. I wore shorts while watching the game. For the Chiefs and Browns, I wore pants. NEVER AGAIN!

Good post. I think, if you're a fan and were being realistic, at this point 2-2 is about what you would expect from the Bills. They beat the teams they should have beat(KC, CLE) and did so how an up and coming team should beat a lower tier team. The problem is the loses were complete blow outs. I think everyone thought we'd see improvement in the division. Unfortunately, we haven't seen it yet. It some ways its a step back from last year, in the division. Will the Bills show up for SF? Who knows at this point.

I wouldn't even say that the Patriots* adjusted at half time. Just look at the stats. In the first half, they were averaging 9+ yards a carry. The first drive they sliced through the Bills defense. What changed in the second half, was the Patriots* eliminated their mistakes. If it wasn't for the 2 missed FGs and the 2 fumbles, the first half might have been much, much different. I think some fans forget that. The Patriots ran for big chunks in the first half and nothing was changed by the Bills defense in the second half. Same old Nickel D'.

It happened because the Bills were in Nickel or Dime the entire game. They took Sheppard and Moats off the field, who have been HUGE in run support this year. And while most teams play Nickel against the Patriots, the Bills version of it was terrible. Scott and Barnett were the only 2 LBs in the game for 90% of the snaps. So when Brady saw 43 as the "Mike" he'd audible to a run and gash the Bills for 10 yards each time. And Wanny saw this the entire first half, the entire 3rd quarter and most of the 4th THEN put Sheppard and Moats back in. Ridiculous.

I would have much rather them throw the ball or at least force them to throw. instead they ran and threw all over the place. And when they kept running there was no adjustment, at all. It was completely frustrating!

Uh because they were playing Nickel and Dime... and Wanny puts in Scott and takes out Sheppard and Moats... They played like 75% of the game with 2 LBs, but yea rag on Sheppard for his coach not allowing him to play. Clearly thats his fault, braniac.

Where you watching the game??? Sheppard played about 2 mins of the game because Scott played MLB the rest of the time. How well did that work out?

Injury

I think its obvious he isn't the long term answer.

Well obviously he didn't win it or the Bills would have won. Crazy. Look no use beating a dead horse, agree to disagree. Fitz put us in position to win the game in the 3rd. Thats what QBs do and I'll leave it at that. Me, Im more upset that our crazy expensive defense couldn't force a punt the entire second half and gave up 52 points.

I agree, but pointing out Spiller's fumble and not FJ's is ridiculous. How about instead of saying Spillers fumble was costly, just say all the turnovers were costly.

both have ankle injuries. could be the dreaded high ankle sprain.

And thats what bothers me as well.. The Bills got extremely lucky with the 2 missed field goals and the 2 turnovers. The defense was still getting gashed. Why wouldn't you see that?

So you bash him in the shout box after the game and this is just a coincidence?