-
Posts
5,500 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by EasternOHBillsFan
-
Poll: Should the "Redskins" name be changed?
EasternOHBillsFan replied to Just in Atlanta's topic in Off the Wall Archives
Holy crap, we actually agree... LOL I should write a piece about him and call it "The Tale of Sir Robin" This came out today as well... only legislation will move this Rock of Gibraltar! There is hope yet for PC opposition forces...! http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/9375313/roger-goodell-defends-washington-redskins-name -
Actually, my point went unnoticed because of the volume of this debate. The person Jim Brown obviously is not like many of the other athletes of his generation, and he has a personality problem. If the guy is a wife beater and is proven to be a jerk because of how he acts long after his playing career was over, then people have a right to call it as they see it. Here is my example HOF list of players who don't have the image problem Jim Brown does: Lenny Moore, Baltimore Colts, b. 1933: http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2011-11-23/sports/bs-sp-catching-up-lenny-moore-20111123_1_joe-paterno-lenny-moore-penn-state Willie Davis, Cleveland Browns/Green Bay Packers, b. 1934: http://www.lasportshall.com/inductees/football/willie-davis/ Jim Parker, Baltimore Colts, b. 1934: http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/ravens/bal-sp.parker19jul19,0,2116898.story Did they have any less of a past of overt racism as Jim Brown did? Did they suffer any less than Jim Brown did? Probably not... he reacted poorly to the bad things that happened to him, and that's a choice he made, not anyone else.
-
These men don't have the same attitude or are wife beaters, and have sterling legacies: Lenny Moore, Baltimore Colts, b. 1933. Willie Davis, Cleveland Browns/Green Bay Packers, b. 1934. Jim Parker, Baltimore Colts, b. 1934. Jim Brown has an attitude problem and despite what affected him, he's still acting like he's entitled. Experiences don't justify crime, so why should we justify how Jim Brown acts?
-
People are going to be very surprised to see him post surgery... my boss's surgery to try and remove the cancer left his face like Roger Ebert's... he had to use a pad to write down longer speech and carried a towel to wipe his drool. It wasn't enough to save him, and I can only hope this surgery is enough to save Jim Kelly.
-
Hopefully the Jim Kelly hate posts will stop today for good... I didn't like him as a person when he played, but he has obviously changed over time and has really been hit with two serious blows. The one thing I think about all of this is how in the hell does a healthy person get cancer? Probably from the toxic dumps that killed my Dad...
-
Poll: Should the "Redskins" name be changed?
EasternOHBillsFan replied to Just in Atlanta's topic in Off the Wall Archives
That sounds fine by me... I'm glad you can be honest about it unlike others who seek to defend their position by masking opinion as fact. Standing down... LOL -
Poll: Should the "Redskins" name be changed?
EasternOHBillsFan replied to Just in Atlanta's topic in Off the Wall Archives
Neither is yours... your righteous indignation doesn't fool me, that's for sure. It is a FACT that at least one Native American is offended by the use of "Redskins", but it is an OPINION to state that a majority are offended by it, and an OPINION that anyone non-Native American who is not involved in polling the whole of the race states it as such. -
Poll: Should the "Redskins" name be changed?
EasternOHBillsFan replied to Just in Atlanta's topic in Off the Wall Archives
So, the only alternative for those who disagree is to try and label those who disagree as bigots, stupid, anything to stuff an agenda down peoples' throats. Like I said as you did, what's next? You see, it never ends... when these things are resolved, new issues will crop up into a death spiral for free speech in this country. The line can't continuously be drawn and redrawn- that leaves us up against the wall with nowhere to go. Spin the wheel... who's the next offended group??? Step right up! -
Poll: Should the "Redskins" name be changed?
EasternOHBillsFan replied to Just in Atlanta's topic in Off the Wall Archives
Really? If you use the word, you can't automatically claim it is offensive and/or racist. That is called hypocrisy... to say it is not the issue is simply not true- it has a LOT to do with the issue. Either it is accepted, or it is wholly unacceptable... no in betweens. -
Poll: Should the "Redskins" name be changed?
EasternOHBillsFan replied to Just in Atlanta's topic in Off the Wall Archives
There is that name calling again... stick to the argument instead of the name calling. Not everyone will be happy and some will be offended by a myriad of things. If we banned everything offensive to everyone, we'd be left with no culture at all. You cannot please EVERYONE,.. why is that so hard to understand??? -
Poll: Should the "Redskins" name be changed?
EasternOHBillsFan replied to Just in Atlanta's topic in Off the Wall Archives
Eventually the so-called offensive language, names, and other aspects of society will be so filtered and or/removed that any assemblance of free speech in this country will cease to exist. That is tyranny by the minority, and that is why I am so against the Redskins changing their name or it even being an issue. Political correctness has gone so overboard it is ludicrous... -
Poll: Should the "Redskins" name be changed?
EasternOHBillsFan replied to Just in Atlanta's topic in Off the Wall Archives
That wasn't a debate... that was an attack that deserved an attacking response... apples and oranges. -
Poll: Should the "Redskins" name be changed?
EasternOHBillsFan replied to Just in Atlanta's topic in Off the Wall Archives
As I said, like in PPP, calling people names instead of sticking to the subject. What do you expect when agree to disagree is not enough? I'm above that PPP crap, like I said.