All_Pro_Bills

Nobody is prohibited from seeing a doctor. But there are rules at the Federal and State level defining and governing how reimbursements to providers are handled. I don't know what the rules are in every state but here in New Jersey if your income is below a certain level the cost of Medicaid coverage can be zero. Or at a minmum subsidized by the program. I expect the rules governing the plan in other States are similar. Medicare is not free. Medicare Part A pays 80% of hospitalization costs. Medicare Part B covers doctor's visits and other services. A deduction for coverage is generally made from the recipient's social security check for Part B. Medicare Part C, Medicare Advantage, is typically provided at cost to the member from commercial carriers such as Humana, for costs not covered by the governments Part A and B plans. It could also cover prescription drug costs and is known as Medicare Part D. There are also State level plans that cover drug costs for seniors. Residents under 65 can check out Medicaid for assistance programs.

There are government agencies with the mission of controlling and managing narratives, news, and public opinion through cooperative or coerced relationships with social and mainstream media outlets. Along with this a legion of former government figures and officials embedded at networks like CNN, MSNBC,and FOX spreading the government's message in roles as commentators and "experts". A cursory attempt to examine the twitter files involving Twitter and Facebook interaction with many government entities will yield a clear view of how much of this operates.

The stated strategic objective is to "do whatever it takes" to support democracy. Now that we've read the required public service announcement. Does it need to be anything more than a target of opportunity chance to mess with Russia and disrupt their objective to spread their influence in Europe, ME, Asia, and Africa? It's just not a real good plan from the folks in Washington from an execution perspective.

I've heard this sentiment from many and I don't think the Republican as a group have the answers but exactly what has this administration accomplished to better America? What's the case for another 4 years?

Your evasive. Tell me what it does require? If it doesn't require a conviction what does it require? An accusation? Like a witch hunt? Punishment without guilt beyond a reasonable doubt along with a presumption of innocence is the foundation of the legal system. So one more time. What's required to invoke 14a on a citizen? Please, no more of your hoax horse crap.

Here's the finger. Section 3 No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. Engaging in an insurrection or a rebellion is a prerequisite for disqualification from office. But nobody engaged in an insurrection or a rebellion. There was no such event. No person was charged. No person was convicted. A committee report doesn't correspond to law. And lots of people throwing around the word insurrection just means they're entitled to their opinion. But that's all it is, an opinion. And opinions are not the basis of invoking constitutional amendments. So the section is not applicable.

My study is on hold pending a simple answer to a simple question you are refusing to provide. So right back at you.

How disappointed will some here be if Trump doesn't go to prison? I won't buy the argument they'll accept it as justice served because they've already got him doing time before the prosecution in any indictment has an opportunity to present the first piece of "evidence" and the defense gets an opportunity for rebuttal.

Trump's definitely a flight risk that will blend in and disappear quite easily. Jack Smith and the judge agreed about that in the J6 case when a warrant issued for Trump's twitter data was not disclosed because they concluded the suspect was a flight risk. So a guy surrounded by Secret Service agents 24/7 is going to slip away by climbing out the bathroom window at some gas station and run through the woods to the highway to meet Rudy in a getaway car that both of them will drive to North Korea? The real reason: The prosecutor and the court wanted to deprive the defense of any opportunity to contest the warrant if it was disclosed.

Simply the best. His level of passion resonated with that of Buffalo sports fans. When the Sabres were good he was great and when they weren't good for so many season recently his voice and calls were a reason to listen and watch. If you grew up with his calls and looked forward to the game for the part he played in the event you can't help but feel like you've lost a member of the family or a close friend.

First we need to agree on what "started" means. When hostilities began and politicians set the wheels in motion or when the first Russan soldier stepped across the border?

Why don't they just tell DHS and Biden that NYS isn't going to accept any more migrants into the state until the Feds do a better job of screening and processing asylum seekers? If the lefties object, tough. Tell them the option is they can open up their personal residences and take in as many people as they'd like. Since we know they'll take in zero that should shut then down real quick.

So in your mind you equate 4 students peacefully protesting shot by guardsman as the same type of scenario as federal agents acting in self-defense against armed and dangerous masked radicals intent on doing harm throwing bricks and firebombs attempting to burn them alive?

Truth translator: You have no idea what specific evidence there is or where to find it. And for all any of us know it might be credible or it might be crap. And anyone certain the guys guilty is just pissing into the wind with their eyes closed. Sorry to point out that doxing is a liberal specialty.

She's a dark angel of death neocon war monger who started up state Department interference in Ukraine under Obama, took a break during Trump, and resumed that job under Biden. War was inevitable and welcomed. Everywhere she goes, death and suffering follow. The song Orgasmatron by Motorhead was written about monsters like her.

This story never sees the light of day on any networks and other major news outlets. Unless its a flip-flop from an incompetent idealistic official's inaction causing hundreds of avoidable deaths to a victim story of criticism based on bias and racism. It's all so predictable.

Unless they're Antifa attacking and trying to burn down the Federal Courthouse in Portland every night for a few months. Instead, those hoodlums were tucked away in their comfy beds every night with a mug of hot cocoa by city officials so they could rest up for the assualt the next day. What Trump should have done was sent Federal Marshalls to city hall to arrest the mayor and other city officials for participating and supporting insurrection. But he's all talk, never showed his opponents he meant businesss, and ultimately didn't have the guts.

Can you clearly articulate the spoken or written words, or deeds, and the case Smith intends to present per the indictment?

I think I need to hear the actual evidence Smith intends to present. That might be when the trial starts. Based on what I 've heard so far, I'm having trouble getting beyond a conclusion that the government's case rests entirely on conjecture and some mindcrime argument premise. That saying one thing while believing something else is a crime. And somehow Smith employs mind reading experts that know the true thought of others. Knows when thier thoughts match their words and when they don't. If that's some or all of the basis of the case it laughable. And its 100% certainty that any conviction rendered and asisted by a favorable judge and jury will get overturned on appeals.

Understand your argument. But resources, both physical and financial, are not infinite. And this isn't the beginning of some great economic expsnsion which requires skilled and unskilled workers in excess of the population. By all accounts we're entering a slowdown. And if we let into the country every person that could find a better life than their home country that might amount to 6 billion people. So what's the limit? 5 million, 20 million, 100 million? Where are they going to live? Who is going to pay for it? Why isn't the priority helping current citizens in need first? Shelter all the homeless for starters.

Liberals have convinced themselves they're morally and intellectually superior to the common folk that suffer from all kinds of undesirable traits and ideas. It's a fanciful delusion. And virtuue signaling is more or less a cost-free endeavor. Only when they believe there are some personal consequences from their open border policy will they, and they do, change their views.

I remember pizza gate well. That was the scandal a few years ago over the national conspiracy and despicable act of using low-fat cheese on pizza. How dare you I say!

What I would like to know is what overt/covert acts were planned or committed to fraudulently alter the vote count by adding or deleting vote or modifying counted votes? Or override the will of the people? Otherwise, does it boil down to a free speech issue. And is the governments contention that expressing discontent with an election result and discussing available legal remedies is no longer allowed? Says who?

Most of the military ranks have been staffed by conservatives until recently. But lately enlistments and re-ups have fallen. Why should they fight and die for liberal leadership that calls them extremists? And frankly hates and looks down upon people that value virtues such as patriotism and honor. And while the idea of following trans Generals into combat may appeal to the social justice crowd, which obviously would never consider military service, most people that formed the core of what used to be the world's most effective fighting force have decided to pass on that opportunity.

If she could gaurantee a Bills Super Bowl victory this season I would seriously consider supporting her re-election in 2024!