
Thurman#1
Community Member-
Posts
15,868 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Thurman#1
-
Please. It's not like Tre's playing for minimum wage here. And he got guaranteed money when the Bills had him under contract (with no protection for injury) for two more years. Ramsey only had one more year under contract and thus more leverage and less time for potential injuries to derail his future.
-
Yeah, around 25 or so, right now anyway. Which happens to be almost the same as the Bills. The Bills will have - at a quick count, feel free to check me - two more guys under contract than the Colts will. The Colts will have sensational amounts of freedom with that money. Same as we did the past couple of years to build our roster very widely with good solid mid-priced FAs. Our OL and DL are much the better for it. It's a major advantage for the Colts. And there will absolutely be major salary inflation that year as demand will exceed supply next year but in that year, 2022, things will switch and supply will greatly exceed demand. Again, we'll be below average, with $95 mill. Crazy to think about. We'll have people on these boards again howling for that year's Jadaveon Clowney, despite this FO's announced tendencies to prioritize re-signing our own FAs.
-
Keep in mind that in 2022, having $94 mill available means we are 19th ranked in the league in available cap. Expect salary inflation. The frickin' Colts have $224 mill estimated available cap space. And though they're #1, there are two other teams above $200 mill. If there's any way to get it done early (using guaranteed roster bonuses in 2022, for example, instead of a signing bonus) they should try. There may not be any way. Josh would have to be very accommodating in method of payment, even if not in actual $$$.
-
Yeah, someone like Josh Norman.
-
He's the Buffalo Bills QB. That makes him mine. Tyrod was mine too, even though I never bought into him after New England figured him out in his seventh game.
-
Loving Levi Wallace for his hustle - but -
Thurman#1 replied to LB48's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I look forward to that. Sully is a fine writer. Who is this new smart but cranky young king of posters? -
Move Dodson into the starting LB's?
Thurman#1 replied to John from Riverside's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Yeah, if that were to fall due in 2022, maybe. Next year, impossible. If they re-sign him, it will be with a tiny first-year salary and a very significant signing bonus w/ a good guarantee on the second year money to make it worthwhile for Milano to sign it. -
Move Dodson into the starting LB's?
Thurman#1 replied to John from Riverside's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Way. It's far from definite. It will be difficult. It might not happen. But it's certainly possible. They need him or someone very much like him. As of now Dodson isn't that guy, and I'm not sure he's got the physical ability. If he does, it'd be good for the Bills. -
Let me remind you of your headline: "Who hates offense now?" See the problem? Nobody. Every. You're far off the track. If people said that 300 yards wasn't needed, they were correct. And if people said that 17-13 games were what they were happy to see, I think you were missing their main point, which was that with that lineup, it was a good way to win, and that we weren't built that year to score a lot of points, that as long as were were winning, running more than most was just fine, particularly with the personnel we had and a young and inconsistent QB who was still developing. And again, that is correct that 300 yard games are not a good thing. A 300 yard game in a loss is a very very bad thing indeed. You're off-base. Nobody was against getting better on offense. They were against people blowing hot air on and on about how a team couldn't be good until it was getting 300 yard games regularly. Because teams can be good with nearly any strategy on offense. As long as they win using it.
-
Buffalo Bills estimated 2020 remaining cap space: $3,452,497, according to Spotrac Zach Ertz 2020 base salary: $6,660,000, according to Spotrac Yeah, I see no problems here at all.
-
Robert Woods 4yr/65m extension
Thurman#1 replied to Mike in Horseheads's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Yup. And that's saying a lot, the drought was filled with mistakes, many really bad and obvious. -
Robert Woods 4yr/65m extension
Thurman#1 replied to Mike in Horseheads's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
It shouldn't fit anyone's line, because it's simply not true. In the P.C. on his arrival in Philly, Jason Peters said he was completely shocked because he'd felt that he realized that the Bills weren't going to pay him and he felt he was going to have to play out his contract and then get a contract elsewhere. And a guy looking at getting a new contract somewhere isn't going to sit for two seasons. He's going to play for a new contract from that new team somewhere else. -
Robert Woods 4yr/65m extension
Thurman#1 replied to Mike in Horseheads's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
That's true. There's no issue with keeping nearly anyone you want. As long as you don't mind letting someone else go. Or two or three or more. That's the balance. I mean, sure, you can keep putting more and more on the credit card but these things come due sooner or later. And a low cap figure absolutely does make it more difficult to run a team. As for what Woods is worth, I just read a story (link below) pointing out that over the last three seasons he ranks among the top 11 NFL receivers in receptions, receiving yards and yards after catch. And that last year he led the league in YAC (577 yards). https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/29916230/source-rams-robert-woods-gets-4-year-65-million-contract-extension And as needs to be mentioned every single time someone signs an extension is that the way they calculate average per year on nearly all extensions these days is wildly misleading. And Woods's extension is more of the same. It's $65M (w/ the possibility of $3M more in milestones) in new money and four new years. But as usual, the new money is not only paid in the new years. Dividing those two numbers together is greatly misleading. Woods is now under contract to the Rams for six years and $79 mill. Which comes to about $13.16M. Which is about 18th in the league now , but the new years of the contract don't start for another couple of years, and by then it will probably be about 30th or so, which will likely seem a terrific bargain. More, the four new years are 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025. He gets his signing bonus now. You can't reasonably divide money paid in 2020 into the years 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025. And 2022 is going to be a year when teams have a lot of spare money, having had to cut contracts to make it through the tough low cap number next year. The cap will probably jump somewhere on the order of $30 - 40 million between 2021 and 2022. Which will cause salary inflation, making salaries like Woods' and Tre's look cheap. The advantage for the players in terms of safety in terms of injuries can't be overestimated, though. It's a good deal for them as well. But again, these contracts aren't nearly as punitive for the teams as you'd think if you only think ... Robert Woods? 4 years for $65M, so it's $17M/ Year? Insane! But again, the figures are misleading. -
What does Darnold's performance say about Jordan Palmer?
Thurman#1 replied to cage's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
IMO, not much. Coaches have people who don't become great pros. Even the best coaches. I think it says that Palmer has a student who - very early in his third year, which is far too early to make a call - is so far still having problems on a team with poor personnel and a questionable coaching staff that was outmanned badly on the day against one of the league's best Ds. -
Mea culpa...I was wrong about Trent Murphy...
Thurman#1 replied to eball's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Yeah, and better than that. -
As a person living in a country - Japan - where people wearing masks in an immensely crowded megalopolis has almost completely flattened infection rates (and also a person who can read scientific studies), I can tell you you are wrong about the masks. The Japanese wear masks every year during cold season and to protect from allergens for hay fever and others. Because of that, there isn't the nutty resistance that has surfaced in the U.S. about this. The U.S. has had 6.4 million cases and 192K deaths. Japan, with a bit less than half our population and ten times our population density, a country closer to and with many more travellers from China, has had 75K confirmed cases and 1,442 deaths. Masks are very effective against airborne pathogens, including COVID. Not perfectly effective, but very very effective. EDIT: Ah, glad to see on this page that you're doing your best to handle this in a reasonable way and at least putting serious consideration into this issue. Good luck to you and yours. There has been some politicization of this issue. But at its heart it is an extremely serious public health issue, as shown by the death count approaching 200K at this point in the U.S. Feel free to ignore me, but how would you feel if one of your employees caught COVID elsewhere and passed it to the others, possibly including you, because of your mask policy? Again, feel free to ignore me and call me a busybody, but it's worth considering. Granted that young people tend towards thoughtlessness, but there's evidence they can be taught over time. Stay healthy.
-
Is the "read option" by the Bills something you like?
Thurman#1 replied to LB48's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I like to see it. Make defenses think and plan for it. I'd just like to see a lot less of it. Some, but a lot less. -
You can't switch them, though. Woods isn't a slot guy. IMO, Woods is a better wideout and Beasley a better slot. Woods is really good. Beane made it publicly very clear afterwards that he wanted to keep Woods but the cap problems made it impossible. If he were here, he'd be competing against John Brown, and I think Brown, as a serious speed guy, is a better complement for Diggs
-
Nah. There are plenty of very reasonable excuses. Every kicker has bad games, every one. Now, if this becomes consistent, fair enough. But he'll get a bit more rope, and it'll be more than a week. Especially as he righted himself later in the game.