Thurman#1

Nonsense about the coaching. Too early to fully know about either guy, but particularly Flores. If you had to pick one right now you'd go with McDermott. This Bills team has overachieved each of the last three years. Not so far this year but it's still up in the air what will happen this year. My guess is that you're right about Allen and Tua, but any guess coming after one game's performance is based on such a vast lack of knowledge as to be worth virtually nothing.

Not buying that bit about reluctance at all. People were overwhelmed with Allen's performances those first four weeks. There was overall very very little reluctance. The narrative has already changed twice. First in that we were for real, then again that we are good but not a serious Super Bowl contender playing as we are. Yeah, it'll switch again if we beat Seattle, which is only reasonable. That's what should happen. Same with the hesitation. Unless the whole team and particularly the defense starts playing better, we'll deserve it until, as you say, we close out the division and win a meaningful January game.

Yeah, that's how it works. In Bizarro world. In this one, on the other hands, each extra game in the win column gives you ... well, it give you an extra win, which is +1.0, not half a game. Two wins more is two games up. One more Dolphins loss when they have played one game less than us is a further half a game. If the Dolphins win that extra game while we're on the bye week, the margin will go down to just two games ahead. If they lose, it will go up to three games ahead. Two and a half games up.

September Josh Allen throwing into November's defenses would not be a good look. September Josh was throwing into man-to-man single coverage deep. If he throws the same pass to the same receiver at the same spot now it's defenced or intercepted by the double coverage teams are applying deep.

Nah, they aren't getting Trevor Lawrence or anywhere close.

Yes, a fantastic HC. I'd rather see him out of here. Won't happen, though, unfortunately. He has that team looking better every day.

There's nobody out there worth paying for. I'd be thrilled, but it's unlikely.

He actually played fairly decent at 1-tech. He wasn't terrible. But yes, as Gunner said above, it stops him from doing what he does best. Not their best option, but they're searching. With all the injuries on top of their 1-tech woes without Star, they've had to try a lot of different things.

Yawn.

Nonsense. Burkhead and Wynn hit him at virtually the same time, Wynn is able to get such good contact that he gets his right hand, the inside hand on him very solidly, while his left appears to not be able to reach him because it's behind Burkhead. Most of Wynn's body is behind Burkhead forcing him forward into Edmunds. Wynn got his whole weight behind the play pushing both Edmunds himself and also forcing Burkhead forward into him. They both get excellent contact and full impact. You can see Edmunds' shoulder fly back off Wynn's hand and the rest of Wynn's weight including his outside hand is right on Burkhead like he's the snowplow and Burkhead is the blade. Yes, Wynn separates after that, but only after getting full contact right at first impact.

The difference being he's complaining about whiny little posters while you're whining about a 6-2 team in a winning effort. Yes, this. Was it Wynn, not Vollmer? Now I have to go check. EDIT: You're right, it's Wynn, I'll go edit.

Please, dude. It's extremely clear that they both got hands on him, within a tenth of a second of each other. 76 was half on Edmunds, his right hand is on his shoulder, and half ramming himself into Burkhead's back pushing him forward. That's 310 pounds of Wynn and 215 of Burkhead. Yes, Wynn separates and only Burkhead is on him for awhile and Wynn connects with him again later, further on down the field. But the initial impact is with both of them hitting him together.

Good lord, you're going to blame that on 49? Not one but two guys get to him unblocked, they both hit him and it's his fault? Jeez, people on here are willing to ignore anything to maintain opinions that didn't particularly make sense even when they were formed.

I'd disagree that it's quite as simple as that. Without Belichick, Brady doesn't win five SBs. But yeah, I've always thought Brady was more of the reason they were as good as they were. Both were needed, but Brady was a bigger part of it.

I'll leave that for you. You're the one making the unequivocal claim, not me. Notice I didn't say, "all of them do," just that "plenty of them do." It's not so much your post I reacted to, I guess, as the commonly expressed feeling on here that good people can't be tough enough for football. Which is obvious nonsense but many seem to believe it. People talk about boy scouts, but there are a ton of terrific people who play football extremely well. My list was just the first few high-character ILBs I thought of. But it's true at every position. Look at Kyle Williams. Go back and look at some of my old favorites like Merlin Olsen or Reggie White (who was wacky but a good guy with character). Look at Ronnie Lott, especially his pinkie finger.

No, it isn't me saying it once twice or a million times that means he's not a bust. What I'm doing, not for the second time but for what feels like the eight billionth time, is pointing out the obvious things that show he's not a bust. It's stuff like him making the Pro Bowl last year. That's one of the many things that mean he's not a bust. And yeah, he was the first replacement, which means top three IL in the AFC. That's not "OK." That's very very good. Guys who "have poor instincts," and "never make impact plays" don't go to the Pro Bowl as first replacements or for that matter at all. Both those statements are wild exaggerations. The Jets game video posted above points it out thoughtfully. He does seem to have regressed a bit. But beyond the problems his injury has caused, quite a bit of that is actually the fact that the system just isn't functioning as well this year. Lotulelei's absence is a big part of that but not all of it. There are problems with run fits. I do thank you for pointing out the double print, though. Lately about half the time I hit "save" everything freezes forever and I end up copying what I wrote, hitting "save" again, and skipping to the last page. Sometimes when I get there there's nothing and I'm glad I copied it so I can easily replace the post. Sometimes it's just fine. And sometimes it's a doubled print and I have to edit one of them out. It's frustrating and as long as it goes on I'll probably double-print once in a while. I went back now and edited it out.

I want him on the team as well. Unless we draft a safety high - which seems unlikely - or unless Marlowe or Jaquan Johnson are ready to take over, we'd have to replace him with a lower-priced FA which would likely mean a less effective player. Thanks for the corrections, I screwed that up.

Nonsense. I'm one and I'm sure there are thousands and thousands of others. I was aware there was certainly a chance but also very very aware it wasn't the only possibility.

No, not hardly all of 'em. What part of the 35 - 9 Chiefs win over the Jets was ugly for the Chiefs? Having said that, you're right that this was a big win and a nice win. The Bills haven't managed a lot of timely last-minute wins on forced turnovers at the last minute against the Pats. I was smiling and screaming "Zimmer!!" for about ten minutes after. Luckiest regime since Polian? Fair enough. Thing is, you make your own luck. And they've made theirs. Luck is the residue of design. Luck is the intersection of preparation and opportunity. And all the other quotations about luck. All true. Great win.

Agreed it depends on who shows up. But that goes for Cam too. His first two or three games he was really sharp throwing the ball. Then his COVID layoff and he got worse. But Simms points out that nearly every season he's had a game or two or three when his mechanics get bad and he has problem but then he has shown the ability to make corrections and improve a lot very quickly. So it depends which Newton shows up as well. I hadn't known till yesterday that Harry wasn't playing. With both Harry and Edelman out that really is going to help us. But if anyone can scheme guys open off bunch formations and rub routes and such, it's Belichick and the Pats. I think we've got a good chance but I'm not outright confident. I'll need to see the stake through the heart, the silver bullet, the head injury to the zombie.

Hope you're right. Simms doesn't claim to know what's going to happen. He wants to do his best to make the right prediction but knows he'll miss many. He wants to be thoughtful and have a line of thought that makes sense and gives him a good chance to be right. IMO he achieved that there. Thoughtful. Makes sense. The Bills could certainly prove him wrong. That's what I'm hoping for. And yeah, I loved that Florio line as well.

IMO Belichick has a gene that absolutely prevents this type of behavior. Losing burns him to the core and winning is oxygen to him. Same with every coach in the league, really, though GMs often think a bit different. Dude, please. Exaggeration is one thing, but outright nuttiness is another. They've got some good players over there. Including one NFL MVP, a defense that is still playing very well against the pass and an offense that can run the ball.

That's what Darius said at Thermopylae Until the fat lady sings, it'll be a tough game.

The Beane and McDermott hires look terrific so far. When does the media call them out for their inability to look at 30 other teams for talent? When they don't look at 30 other teams for talent. Which simply hasn't happened so far. If you go look at the 80 man rosters for camps the last four years you'll find how many total guys were brought in? 140? 150? And the list of Panthers comes to 20 if you use the one posted above? Please. Sad argument.

Nonsense. Your count there says far more about you than it does about those players or the F.O. How is it bad to bring in, for instance, Philly Brown on a $690K one-year contract with no signing bonus, and cut him. Is it somehow bad to pay a guy training camp money to come in and be a training camp body? Nonsense. You're supposed to do that with 30 or 35 guys every year. In fact, you have to. It's not a failure. It's business as usual for every single NFL team. Or Jeremiah Sires, who signed a one-year deal for $650,588? Love how he got that extra $588. He turned out to be a bubble guy who stuck around for the season and saw a bit of time on STs and as a third-stringer injury replacement. And that's how he was paid. That's not a bad pickup, it's just fine, particularly in a rebuild year when we were having major cap pressure and were going to have to bring in a bunch of extra low-pricers. We got what we paid for, and that's a lot of the guys on these lists, Philly Browns who cost virtually nothing and were training camp bodies or vet minimum third stringers. As Hapless said, most of those guys were brought in at minimum salaries, many let go without seeing a game check. Bringing a guy in as a camp body and cutting him isn't a bad signing. It's just fine. And that's how most of this list came in. Your list had 21 people, but included Kaelin Clay twice, so taking out one of the Clays leaves us with 20 guys. Here's how they look relative to their contracts: Those just fine, no problem vet min or camp guys: Ryan Davis, Philly Brown, Leonard Johnson, Jeremiah Sirles, Mike Tolbert, Kaelin Clay, L.J. McCray, Captain Munnerlyn, Joe Webb, Robert Thomas Bad Signing: Benjamin Good signings: Lotulelei, Anderson, Marlowe, Coleman who had a vet min type contract and outplayed that, Daryl Williams Decent signing so far at least, but could still go either way: Josh Norman Overpaid so far but it's still to early to be sure: A.J. Klein, Mario Addison, Vernon Butler Most would disagree with me on a guy here and there, but overall that's not bad so far.