SDS

So all the coaches he has worked for love him and all the players who have spoken about him love him. Clearly someone to stay away from…

Why don’t you go ahead and define failure? It seems to me we have a guy who is never had a quarterback with talent to produce in the passing game, yet he’s managed to have tremendously successful running games without the threat from a talented quarterback to back off the defenses.

Where are you a big follower of the Browns, Dolphins and Chiefs during those glory years? Did you watch those games unimpressed with his offense and play calling?

Absolutely it is. Just the good old boys. All of us against you. It’s what we do around here. We choose random member IDs out of a hat and then we attack. We viciously attack innocent posters for no reason at all. Borderline criminal really.

Absolutely. It’s everyone else. It’s not you at all. Despite the fact there have been people posting here for decades and have tens of thousands of posts everyone has decided to unnecessarily choose you to pick on. It’s their fault. You bear no responsibility.

It’s time to move on and discuss Buffalo Bills football. Thank you.

Yawn. You are one of 1000 “I’m just trying to talk football- why is everyone picking on me?“ guys that have come through here the last two decades. I can assure you, 100% of the time, whenever someone posts “it’s everybody else not me” – it is always that person. Always.

The manner in which you choose to discuss topics is highly disruptive, highly repetitive, and unnecessarily grating to other community members. Honestly, I’m literally the last person who hasn’t voted to pull the plug. No one here is required to prove anything to you but you continue to needlessly berate them. Well guess what, this is a Buffalo Bills fan community. It is not unreasonable for members to see the bright side of situations. It is not unreasonable for people to be hopeful.

I actually don’t need $1 million to make that happen thank you very much. FYI, you are probably the most complained about poster here in the reports that we get. So there’s that…

Or maybe your critical thinking is just flat out awful on this topic?

I think his championship rings also give him credibility inside the locker room. He has seen firsthand what it takes for a team to be the best.

Jesus. So while his ability is apparent to some of the top football coaches that have ever coached, because it is not clear to YOU then that is all that matters - the guy in a house somewhere with NFL.com on his browser and no actual knowledge of his ability as a coach.

How much do I have to pay you to just turn off your computer and watch the rest of the fourth game?

[This is an automated response]The topic title is potentially misleading. Accurate titles help the community find topics relevant to their interests and avoids reader frustration. Please change the topic title to more accurately reflect content of the original post.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.Thank you. We don’t really do the lowbrow type of stuff here. Or at least we try to minimize it. Please change the title and the content of your post regarding tampons.

Lol. Yeah. Whatever.

The man is a University of Rochester alumni! His intelligence and education cannot be disputed… Go Jackets!

Those two assclowns were idiots for hiring him.

That anyone would hold any coach’s tenure in Cleveland against them is patently absurd.

Says who?

Says who?

We should all stick to talking Buffalo Bills football. Thank you.

I would like to think the GOAT would have gotten out of bounds on that play at the end of the game. Maybe that’s just me…

[This is an automated response]As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A single name if far too vague to post as a title and provides little insight into what specifically the post is talking about.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.Thank you.

I think we can move on from this…

Or perhaps the way you chose to phrase #1 was inappropriate.