SDS

Perhaps there was a joke there to be made, however I don’t think yours was a good choice.

So I have to ask people not to deliberately be a complete !@#$ to me day after day? Expecting a minimal level of social grace is not unreasonable. I was very patient with his constant snark. He wouldn’t stop. I directly addressed his complaints, only to have him continually make the same comments as if I didn’t say anything to him at all. Clearly he was not receptive to my explanations, nor accepting of my decisions (I can’t please everyone). Instead, he consciously chose to antagonize me. I consciously chose not be antagonized. imo

Unfortunately, statistics don’t work that way.

Why would I do that? He’s a Class A prick. I understand not everyone agrees with our position regarding the Buffalo News. I listened to the feedback, the criticism and the suggestions. I understand not everyone was going to happy with the software upgrade because people resist change. But it was necessary and I explained myself. I also listened to the feedback, the criticism, and the suggestions. I bent over backwards to make changes where I could. Do you know what I don’t need? The same prick coming here day after day after day and sticking his god damn finger in my eye every time he walked by. I heard and responded to his comments. His inability to accept reality does not give him free reign to continue to constantly declare how the site is going down hill and is garbage, I’m taking kickbacks, the software is an unnecessary downgrade, the design looks like a my little pony site, etc, etc, etc... I reserve the right, at some point, to finally say !@#$ off - I don’t need to read this **** anymore. imo

[This is an automated response]As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A single name if far too vague to post as a title and provides little insight into what specifically the post is talking about.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.Thank you. You have been on this board for over four years and you don’t know that name only titles are unacceptable?

That wasn’t necessary.

Literally, this attitude sums up decades of Buffalo Bills futility.

They could tweak them by not having the logo everywhere, but I certainly don’t see any reason for them to change. Especially since we get all of these color rush alternates.

I would say your explanation was confusing. If you want to use 3/1 as a better figure of merit you could always drop some outlier years To account for those early or late career seasons.

Basically I’m looking for someone to add the various important NFL dates on the calendar.

How does 1.5/1 equal 3/1?

You lost me on that 1.5 TD/INT ratio part.

Regardless who or who may not have inside info on who the next offense of coordinator will be, it is of very, very limited value because we are all going to know soon enough anyway.

[This is an automated response]The thread is no longer contributing positively to the community and therefore the discussion has been closed.Thank you.

Perhaps the two of you need to learn where the report button is?

I’m just not seeing any resistance in the comments. I don’t want a Shula, a Marino, a Brady, a Belichek or anyone one of their ilk on the Bills - ever.

How can any fan of a certain age want a !@#$ing Shula on the team? Jesus…

This is not a fact. It is only your opinion it is a fact the title needs to reflect this.

[This is an automated response]The topic title is potentially misleading. Accurate titles help the community find topics relevant to their interests and avoids reader frustration. Please change the topic title to more accurately reflect content of the original post.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.Thank you.

[This is an automated response]The topic title is potentially misleading. Accurate titles help the community find topics relevant to their interests and avoids reader frustration. Please change the topic title to more accurately reflect content of the original post.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.Thank you.

Unless for cap, scheme or team issues - you probably shouldn’t let go of any player you don’t have a replacement for. Why would you want to let go of 30+ players without knowing if their replacements would be better or worse?

[This is an automated response]The thread is no longer contributing positively to the community and therefore the discussion has been closed.Thank you. Unfortunately, the same cast of politcal commentators can’t help themselves.

[This is an automated response]As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A single name if far too vague to post as a title and provides little insight into what specifically the post is talking about.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.Thank you.

That's great math right there.

Prove that statement.