DELLAPELLE JOHN Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 Peter king has reported the bills and packers are interested in vick.... i say we sign him, we need a back-up qb! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 Is this what you are referring to? 8. I think, the more I watch football this summer, Vick's new team should be the Bills. Nothing against Trent Edwards. I just think the Bills are in it to win it this year. Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writ...l#ixzz0NnJnLIKr Doesn't mention a thing about being interested. Just mentions that King THINKS they would be a good fit. The Bills are set at QB, they don't want to mess with Edwards mojo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaGimp Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 Is this what you are referring to? 8. I think, the more I watch football this summer, Vick's new team should be the Bills. Nothing against Trent Edwards. I just think the Bills are in it to win it this year. Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writ...l#ixzz0NnJnLIKr in it to win what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 [This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive subject lines. The topic starter can edit the subject line to make it more appropriate. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELLAPELLE JOHN Posted August 10, 2009 Author Share Posted August 10, 2009 Is this what you are referring to? 8. I think, the more I watch football this summer, Vick's new team should be the Bills. Nothing against Trent Edwards. I just think the Bills are in it to win it this year. Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writ...l#ixzz0NnJnLIKr Doesn't mention a thing about being interested. Just mentions that King THINKS they would be a good fit. The Bills are set at QB, they don't want to mess with Edwards mojo. No, peter king actually said on 1st and 10 the bills and packers ARE INTERESTED IN SIGNING MICHAEL VICK....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 No, peter king actually said on 1st and 10 the bills and packers ARE INTERESTED IN SIGNING MICHAEL VICK....... Can you provide a link? When posting about something on the internets, it helps if you link to the content. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 Can you provide a link? When posting about something on the internets, it helps if you link to the content. Tell me what of this interweb you speak of? Is it sorcery? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELLAPELLE JOHN Posted August 10, 2009 Author Share Posted August 10, 2009 Tell me what of this interweb you speak of? Is it sorcery? It was on tv, so i cant provide a link sry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 It was on tv, so i cant provide a link sry I don't doubt that you did, but I think King is just postulating. He mentioned in the article today that he thought they would be a good fit, but didn't mention anything about the Bills showing any interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 I don't doubt that you did, but I think King is just postulating. He mentioned in the article today that he thought they would be a good fit, but didn't mention anything about the Bills showing any interest. Why do you think Tony Dungy was in Canton? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 Why do you think Tony Dungy was in Canton? Don't rile the children up, it's too early for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 Peter king has reported the bills and packers are interested in vick.... i say we sign him, we need a back-up qb! and the Buffalo News reported that the Bills weren't interested... You can count out the Buffalo Bills as a potential suitor for Michael Vick. Russ Brandon, the team's chief operating officer/general manager, told The Buffalo News today that the Bills aren't interested in bringing in the former Atlanta Falcons quarterback. "We wouldn't have any interest at this time," Brandon said. "We're comfortable with our roster as it stands right now." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 and the Buffalo News reported that the Bills weren't interested... "We wouldn't have any interest at this time," Brandon said. "We're comfortable with our roster as it stands right now." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8-8 Forever? Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 Why not Vick? Lets have some fun. This team is going nowhere this year against the schedule it is playing. Fitzpatrick is a toad. Hamden has never played in the reg season. TE gets hurt. Vick adds unique variety and excitement. He's done his time, so PETA people go away. There are no Siberian work camps.. you do your time, you get to come back to society. So lets get him and get him cheap. He can't play for 2 months anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeMonkey Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 Why not Vick? Lets have some fun. ... So lets get him and get him cheap. He can't play for 2 months anyway. That's the one big selling point to getting him in my opinion. You could probably pick him up in the bargain bin on a one (actually 1/2) year contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dollars 2 donuts Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 I'm sorry, but aren't a lot of you guys leaving out that fact that before Vick even went to jail a couple of years ago that he really wasn't that good of a quarterback? Do some of you think, and I am not knocking you if you do, that going away to jail and not playing any football for years gave him insight to be a better and smarter QB than the one we have now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kota Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 Peter King is a blow hard and his scoops should be in a cat litter box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 If they did have an interest, it wouldn't be as their ideal starter. Wild Cat and 2nd string. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthGeorgiaBillsFan Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 While I haven't heard or read anything that leads me to believe the Bills would like to sign Vick, I consider that: a) no team is going to advertise their interest in the guy, even if they fully intend to sign him, because they don't want to have to compete for him, and b) I can see no lucid reason why the Bills *shouldn't* be interested in Vick. What an upgrade at backup he would make if Trent goes down or for some reason can't hack it (I doubt that would be the case, but insurance never hurts), and also what a dynamic player he would be in that runner/passer player type that has been popularized by the wildcat. He seems like he would suit that type of position better than any player who has ever played the game, Tim Tebow included, imo. c) Trent Edwards is a professional quarterback, and if he doesn't have the psychological capacity to handle a little competition then do we really want him calling signals for us? I mean if he can lose his mojo by the Bills acquiring more talent, then he probably doesn't have the demeanor to be successful anyway. I would be ecstatic if the Bills signed Vick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Philster Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 b) I can see no lucid reason why the Bills *shouldn't* be interested in Vick. because decent human beings can't root for a killer. I'm convinced some people would cheer on Charles Manson at WR if he could catch the ball Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts