Bishop Hedd Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 This woman is nominated and the Republicans (who according to recent polls make up about 20 percent of the electorate now) are going apeschit! So predictable....still trying to keep the white man legacy alive in the face of changing demographics. The far right will never get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fastback Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Are you Crayonz? Seriously. You are one funny mofo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Are you Crayonz? Seriously. You are one funny mofo. ;) He's not Crayonz. Crayonz and BH are a different kind of funny Crayonz is funny Bishop is funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 She's a racist. She belongs to La Raza which mean "The Race". If a white nominee belonged to an organization called The Race, you'd have him locked up. Where were you when the dems were sabotaging Bushes hispanic judicial nominees? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 Where were you when the dems were sabotaging Bushes hispanic judicial nominees? Leading the charge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 She's a racist. . I dont think she is. If you think she is, than I think you are. Knock it off, man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 She's a racist. She belongs to La Raza which mean "The Race". If a white nominee belonged to an organization called The Race, you'd have him locked up. Seriously, are you joking or are you really that ignorant? I make no apologies for the whack-jobs on the left (including a few on this board), but do you EVER do any of your own research or is there a one-stop center for daily right-wing stupidity? Are you just a "little" embarrassed you're parroting Tancredo's nutball rants? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 How about this one? Can you guess who uttered this beauty about Judge Sotomayor? "Let's hope that the key conferences aren't when she's menstruating or something, or just before she's going to menstruate. That would really be bad. Lord knows what we would get then." ANSWER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 How about this one? Can you guess who uttered this beauty about Judge Sotomayor? "Let's hope that the key conferences aren't when she's menstruating or something, or just before she's going to menstruate. That would really be bad. Lord knows what we would get then." The Man Show? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingon Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 The Man Show? Zicke, Zacke, Zicke, Zacke, Hoi, Hoi, Hoi! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PearlHowardman Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 The far right will never get it. With hot women like Sarah Palin in the Republican party we definitely get "it"! With brutally ugly women like Caroline Kennedy and Sonia Sotomayor it's abundantly clear that if that's what Democrats refer to as "it" then you can all have "it". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 I know La Raza is not as bad as the KKK but its no Polish Falcons either (to bring in a Buffalo reference). La Raza does mean "The Race". Hispanic is NOT a race. Like I said, if a white politician or judge belonged to "The Race", he'd be tarred and feathered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotwing Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 La Raza End of story. She should not even be considered for the job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 I know La Raza is not as bad as the KKK but its no Polish Falcons either (to bring in a Buffalo reference). La Raza does mean "The Race". Hispanic is NOT a race. Like I said, if a white politician or judge belonged to "The Race", he'd be tarred and feathered. How about educating yourself before making lowest common denominator statements? Go look up WHY isn't called La Raza and explain what is so offensive. Moreover, It actually IS like the NAACP, Bnai Brith, and, in many ways, like the Polish and Irish societies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlaskaDarin_Has_AIDS Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 She's a racist. She belongs to La Raza which mean "The Race". If a white nominee belonged to an organization called The Race, you'd have him locked up. Where were you when the dems were sabotaging Bushes hispanic judicial nominees? She also think judges make the law. That's called legislating from the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 How about educating yourself before making lowest common denominator statements? Go look up WHY isn't called La Raza and explain what is so offensive. Moreover, It actually IS like the NAACP, Bnai Brith, and, in many ways, like the Polish and Irish societies. Just calling it "The Race" is offensive. I don't know what state you live in, but in CA they are at every pro illegal alien protest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 Just calling it "The Race" is offensive.I don't know what state you live in, but in CA they are at every pro illegal alien protest. For once, look something up to see the story behind the story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 For once, look something up to see the story behind the story. "Por La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada" Let me know if any of the other "groups" listed here have a similar motto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 I know La Raza is not as bad as the KKK but its no Polish Falcons either (to bring in a Buffalo reference). La Raza does mean "The Race". Hispanic is NOT a race. Like I said, if a white politician or judge belonged to "The Race", he'd be tarred and feathered. Please enlighten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 Please enlighten. There is a difference between race and ethnicity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 There are three races. They used to be called Caucasian, Negroid and Mongoloid (I don't know the PC terms now). From certain traits on the skull, the race of the person can be determined (ever see CSI or numerous shows on trueTV?). Hispanic is not one of them. Hispanic is a group of nationalities, like slavic. Hispanic is a PC term that really means nothing except what the liberals want it to mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 "Por La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada" Let me know if any of the other "groups" listed here have a similar motto. You are a parrot of nutballs like Tancredo. That is NOT La Raz's motto, never was. Get a friggin clue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 There is a difference between race and ethnicity. There's also a huge difference between racial and racist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 There are three races.They used to be called Caucasian, Negroid and Mongoloid (I don't know the PC terms now). From certain traits on the skull, the race of the person can be determined (ever see CSI or numerous shows on trueTV?). Hispanic is not one of them. Hispanic is a group of nationalities, like slavic. Hispanic is a PC term that really means nothing except what the liberals want it to mean. May be the most ignorant post I've ever read. It's difficult to know where to begin but if you think Hispanic is a PC/liberal term then there is likely no point engaging with ignorant morons like you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 May be the most ignorant post I've ever read. I'll venture a guess and say you've never taken an Anthropology class Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 I'll venture a guess and say you've never taken an Anthropology class Jeez Louise, this has NOTHING to do with Anthropology. (Do you REALLY think that?) It's what the community thinks of themselves. Most "Hispanic" leaders often say that the term is broader than the literal translation - "the people" "the community" "this collective, yet not homogeneous, group we call ourselves." It's all very simple yet there are those who either don't get, don't want to get it or purposely disparage it for short-term political gain. Which are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 It's all very simple yet there are those who either don't get, don't want to get it or purposely disparage it for short-term political gain. Which are you? Neither. I'm somebody who understands the theory of human evolution Hispanic is a mix of "Caucasoids" (European, mostly Spanish) and "Mongoloid" (tho there is some argument whether the North/South American branch should be reclassified it's own species as they were separated from the main Asian branch for a few thousand years. A similar argument has been made for Australian Aboriginees) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Neither. I'm somebody who understands the theory of human evolution Hispanic is a mix of "Caucasoids" (European, mostly Spanish) and "Mongoloid" (tho there is some argument whether the North/South American branch should be reclassified it's own species as they were separated from the main Asian branch for a few thousand years. A similar argument has been made for Australian Aboriginees) Are you purposely playing stupid? Which part of "this has nothing to do with Anthropology" don't you understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 May be the most ignorant post I've ever read. It's difficult to know where to begin but if you think Hispanic is a PC/liberal term then there is likely no point engaging with ignorant morons like you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Are you purposely playing stupid? Which part of "this has nothing to do with Anthropology" don't you understand? Okay I'll bite, it'll be good for a laugh. Explain how the definition of a race has nothing to do with Anthropology Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Okay I'll bite, it'll be good for a laugh. Explain how the definition of a race has nothing to do with Anthropology Jesus H. Christ. It's my friggin' post you moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Jesus H. Christ. It's my friggin' post you moron. Could you point me to which one of your angry incoherent ramblings you're talking about? Sorry, my Moron-English translator isn't working Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 From Wiki: La Raza is sometimes used to denote people of Chicano (i.e. Mexican American) and Mexican descent and the Hispanic world, as well by mestizos who share Native American or national Hispanic heritage. The term originated in the 1925 book La Raza Cósmica, which translates to "The Cosmic Race", written by Mexican writer José Vasconcelos. He described La Raza Cosmica as the product of gradual racial mixing that was already underway in the Hispanic world. Vasconcelos believed that eventually all of the people within the Spanish Empire would be completely mixed into a new race. La Raza does NOT mean "the race." It may translate that way, but according to the definition above--which is sadly uncited--La Raza refers to the perpetual mixing of races until a new race is born. Believe it or not "connotation" exists outside the English language as well. So, until some of you knuckleheads can provide a better reason why the National Council of La Raza is bad bad bad aside from the presence of a word you wish to define in your own terms, go fish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Could you point me to which one of your angry incoherent ramblings you're talking about? Sorry, my Moron-English translator isn't working If you can't read, I can't help you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 If you can't read, I can't help you. hukt ahn fonicks werkt fer mee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Lieutenant Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 From certain traits on the skull, the race of the person can be determined (ever see CSI or numerous shows on trueTV?). How much TV do you watch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 I was watching Forensic Files last night where a guy faked his own death. They found part of the skull and a few teeth in the guys burnt out car. When the insurance company (the guy had $7 mil in coverage) investigated they found the the incisor had a shovel shape which indicated are mongoloid characteristics (N & S American Indians and Asians). After they caught the guy he confessed that he dug up some peasant from a Mexican cemetery and placed him in the car. I have also heard people that do the reconstructions of features from the skulls state that people of Negroid race have a wider nasal opening in the skull. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 There is a difference between race and ethnicity. I've long been aware of the difference. I was really interested in Wacka's explanation. But thanks anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 Seriously though, if there are only three races, why doesn't it piss off the hebes when you trash polacks, and why aren't all gooks offended when someone blasts a chink? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 Seriously though, if there are only three races, why doesn't it piss off the hebes when you trash polacks, and why aren't all gooks offended when someone blasts a chink? What's the difference? They all look the same to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts