erynthered Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 No, they were not here legally. They were all deported. We've been through that. None of that is in dispute. However, their immigration status has no bearing on the civil rights issue. The Judge has ruled on it twice now. Civil Rights do not end at the border. He's been exceedingly clear on that point. I must have missed that, sorry. Help me here. How were they here legally, again? Any of them? and if they were crossing leaglly, why wouldnt they cross at an appointed location? I'm not questioning the civil suit right now. That IMO is bull sh--, regardless of the points you make and the Judge that is over seeing this case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 Now, THIS is an interesting thread. And, I have to give a big tip-o-the-hat to Mr. Coli, for kicking ass and taking names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 Oh look the birthday boy decides to join the Frey with a fellatio of coli. Nice. BTW, happy birthday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFFALOTONE Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 Now, THIS is an interesting thread. And, I have to give a big tip-o-the-hat to Mr. Coli, for kicking ass and taking names. What fight are you watching pops? This aint even close. BTW Happy Bday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt. Dan's Revenge Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 What fight are you watching pops? This aint even close. BTW Happy Bday. Happy Birthday Dean, hope its been a great one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tennesseeboy Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 I must have missed that, sorry. Help me here. How were they here legally, again? Any of them? and if they were crossing leaglly, why wouldnt they cross at an appointed location? I'm not questioning the civil suit right now. That IMO is bull sh--, regardless of the points you make and the Judge that is over seeing this case. Whether a person is here legally or illegally isn't the point. Trespassing is more to the point. But even trespassing does not warrant threatening to have dog attack or holding at gunpoint. Not in most states. If the guy overstepped his authority under the law...he's gonna pay. That's the way the system works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in San Diego Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 Maybe he should put in landmines and then it won't be the trail of choice anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 But even trespassing does not warrant threatening to have dog attack. Funny, i thought this was exactly the point of a "Beware of Dog" sign. What exactly is the difference between having that sign posted and telling some illegal dirtbags that your dog will attack them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 Funny, i thought this was exactly the point of a "Beware of Dog" sign. What exactly is the difference between having that sign posted and telling some illegal dirtbags that your dog will attack them? No Hablo inglés Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Jack Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 Funny, i thought this was exactly the point of a "Beware of Dog" sign. What exactly is the difference between having that sign posted and telling some illegal dirtbags that your dog will attack them? The ACLU would sue him because the sign wasn't in other languages than just English. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/hotstories/6267853.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 Shouldn't have gotten a penny and made them pay his legal expenses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts