Frez Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 I've always liked Turner the burner and he's tearing it up with the Falcons. So, who is the better RB of the two? My vote is for Michal Turner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flbillsfan#1 Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 I've always liked Turner the burner and he's tearing it up with the Falcons. So, who is the better RB of the two? My vote is for Michal Turner. They are both very good backs, but Lynch is younger & CHEAPER right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 I've always liked Turner the burner and he's tearing it up with the Falcons. So, who is the better RB of the two? My vote is for Michal Turner. Not a fair comparison. Lynch plays in a Dick Jauron offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 San Diego has the 15th rated defense against the run. San Francisco has the 14th best defense against the run Turner is going to the West coast and San Fran is coming to the East coast. In a close choice like this I alway go with the Bills player it's even more exciting when they do well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew026 Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Lynch. Not only do I like his game better but he's jsut so easy to love. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hossage Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 I dont think it is even close. Turner is just plain old better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 I've always liked Turner the burner and he's tearing it up with the Falcons. So, who is the better RB of the two? My vote is for Michal Turner. Just curious, what prompted this question? Seems sorta arbitrary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPicc2114 Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 I dont think it is even close. Turner is just plain old better. You got that right... Old Turner is like 27 going on 28 and Lynch is only 22 years old. I would rather take the 22 year old. Running backs only make it to 30. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 I bet Turner would suck if he played for the Bills. We'd find a way to ruin him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 You got that right... Old Turner is like 27 going on 28 and Lynch is only 22 years old. I would rather take the 22 year old. Running backs only make it to 30. Turner's 26, but you definitely have a point. Always go with the younger guy when it comes to running backs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dog14787 Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Not a fair comparison. Lynch plays in a Dick Jauron offense. You can't blame the offense on Jauron, he probably doesn't even understand the mangy beast Steve Fairchild left behind, much less have any control over it. Nobody does Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevewin Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Not a fair comparison. Lynch plays in a Dick Jauron offense. Michael Turner plays ina Mike Mularkey offense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Michael Turner plays ina Mike Mularkey offense Geez you're right. Now we know why Marv wanted him to stay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleBuff Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Not even close. Turner is way better. I will say this about Marshawn Inch. If he wanted to he could do the Geico caveman ads.........no makeup needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thurman#1 Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Marshawn is damn good. Turner is better. He's got speed that Marshawn will never have and he's just as tough to tackle. He seems to have fantastic burst through the hole, which Marshawn doesn't. A few years back, we fought over whether we should get Turner. Many said he wouldn't be any good away from SD. Those folks were dead wrong. The guy is top 3 in the league and we would be better off with him. SD wanted the first round draft pick that turned into Marshawn. In other words, at one point, we could have traded Turner for Marshawn. That would have been a very good trade indeed. Also, most RBs wear down around 30, but Turner is likely to be an exception because of how little wear he has on him. Still, you've gotta love Marshawn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WellDressed Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 I can't sleep...........Ricky "Running" Watters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2020 Our Year For Sure Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Not a fair comparison. Lynch plays in a Dick Jauron offense. [/crusade] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 I've always liked Turner the burner and he's tearing it up with the Falcons. So, who is the better RB of the two? My vote is for Michal Turner. I like Lynch over Turner because he's more versatile. Lynch is also more proven as he's also been a solid performer over a year and a half, whereas Turner's only done it as a starter for half a season. But all that said I'd still rather have Turner than LT, and LT over Lynch, so go figure ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Philster Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Just curious, what prompted this question? Seems sorta arbitrary. I'd guess it's one of two things 1. There was talk we would go after Turner in the 2007 offseason instead of drafting Lynch 2. The original poster has to decide which one to play in his fantasy league. Me, I've got both of them as my starting RBs in 2 of my 3 leagues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOOOOOO Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Turner/Norwood might be the sickest 1-2 punch in the league Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(2).thumb.jpeg.6e78fe3142ec9e6bfedbf027610db26f.jpeg)
Recommended Posts