SectionC3 Posted September 12 Posted September 12 Just now, Wolfgang said: Your hypocrisy followed by your holier than thou schtick never ceases to amuse me... Yeah, sure. Whatever. Nobody talked about murder except for you. Keep on inflaming. You're part of the problem. 10 hours ago, SCBills said: He’ll take things Kirk said out of context like black pilots and civil rights. It’s all they have. Gaslighting, lying and misleading. Who is "they?" And gaslighting hardly is a one way street. J6 was a day of love? We're for law and order, but we issue pardons to people who participated in that nonsense? Give me a break. All of it has to stop on both sides. 1
Wolfgang Posted September 12 Posted September 12 2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Yeah, sure. Whatever. Nobody talked about murder except for you. Keep on inflaming. You're part of the problem. Who is "they?" And gaslighting hardly is a one way street. J6 was a day of love? We're for law and order, but we issue pardons to people who participated in that nonsense? Give me a break. All of it has to stop on both sides. This thread is about the MURDER of Charlie Kirk... 48 pages worth... Your hypocrisy knows no limit... Your need for appearing to have the moral high ground is obvious... 2
SectionC3 Posted September 12 Posted September 12 1 minute ago, Wolfgang said: This thread is about the MURDER of Charlie Kirk... 48 pages worth... Your hypocrisy knows no limit... Your need for appearing to have the moral high ground is obvious... Wrong again. "Off the stage" doesn't come remotely close to "murder." Keep on gaslighting.
Wolfgang Posted September 12 Posted September 12 2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Wrong again. "Off the stage" doesn't come remotely close to "murder." Keep on gaslighting. I have no doubt that you will... Try to be more subtle with your rhetoric in a thread discussing how Charlie Kirk was taken "off the stage"...
SectionC3 Posted September 12 Posted September 12 Just now, Wolfgang said: I have no doubt that you will... Try to be more subtle with your rhetoric in a thread discussing how Charlie Kirk was taken "off the stage"... What's your point? You're trying to turn a common phrase into something it's not. If I had said something like "out of the tent," then I would agree with what otherwise are your continued efforts to gaslight and to mislead. But I didn't. And your continued efforts to twist, and to contort, and to mislead are part of the problem.
Wolfgang Posted September 12 Posted September 12 2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: your continued efforts to twist, and to contort, and to mislead are part of the problem.
SCBills Posted September 12 Posted September 12 People on the left, who think Charlie Kirk was some extremist, are in for a rude awakening. And I’m not saying that’s necessarily a good thing. I’m simply someone on the conservative right that knows Charlie Kirk was amicable, compassionate and one of the bigger conservative forces keeping the new generation of the right at bay. Now he’s gone. And now they’re furious. 1 1
BullBuchanan Posted September 12 Posted September 12 (edited) 2 hours ago, Big Blitz said: Denying science, reality, and truth. Democrats, 2025. Just as insane as they were in 1861. Hopefully no one on the right decides Prominent Ds (there aren’t any) haven’t adapted to the times. I won't shed any tears for Democrats either. They're just conservatives that don't believe you should say the N word in public. What now? 1 hour ago, SCBills said: People on the left, who think Charlie Kirk was some extremist, are in for a rude awakening. And I’m not saying that’s necessarily a good thing. I’m simply someone on the conservative right that knows Charlie Kirk was amicable, compassionate and one of the bigger conservative forces keeping the new generation of the right at bay. Now he’s gone. And now they’re furious. let them "be furious". Stew in that ***** forever. Clowns like him are the reason they exist in the first place. He made his career stoking hate and fear. Edited September 12 by BullBuchanan
Orlando Buffalo Posted September 12 Posted September 12 1 hour ago, BullBuchanan said: let them "be furious". Stew in that ***** forever. Clowns like him are the reason they exist in the first place. He made his career stoking hate and fear. Can you show me when he "stoked hate and fear"? I have seen many clips of him and not once did he tell people to hate, in fact he did the opposite. If you can I will accept it but maybe you have been lied to about who he is and your hatred should be towards those who lied to you about him.
BullBuchanan Posted September 12 Posted September 12 2 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: Can you show me when he "stoked hate and fear"? I have seen many clips of him and not once did he tell people to hate, in fact he did the opposite. If you can I will accept it but maybe you have been lied to about who he is and your hatred should be towards those who lied to you about him. No, you absolutely won't. You don't believe in things based on facts, you believe in things based on ideological allegiances. If you need me to point out an example for you of a time when this guy said horrendous things, then you aren't arguing in good faith, because the examples are plentiful and anyone who has even heard of the guy has heard/read them.
Royale with Cheese Posted September 12 Posted September 12 3 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said: No, you absolutely won't. You don't believe in things based on facts, you believe in things based on ideological allegiances. If you need me to point out an example for you of a time when this guy said horrendous things, then you aren't arguing in good faith, because the examples are plentiful and anyone who has even heard of the guy has heard/read them. You are the one who spun a conspiracy on here lol. 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted September 12 Posted September 12 1 minute ago, BullBuchanan said: No, you absolutely won't. You don't believe in things based on facts, you believe in things based on ideological allegiances. If you need me to point out an example for you of a time when this guy said horrendous things, then you aren't arguing in good faith, because the examples are plentiful and anyone who has even heard of the guy has heard/read them. I actually don't know much about him, I have learned more in the past few days then in total before, and your response tells what I need. You believe what you have been told and forget doing any of your own research, and anyone who asks for an actual single piece evidence is arguing in bad faith.
BullBuchanan Posted September 12 Posted September 12 7 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: I actually don't know much about him, I have learned more in the past few days then in total before, and your response tells what I need. You believe what you have been told and forget doing any of your own research, and anyone who asks for an actual single piece evidence is arguing in bad faith. Nope, I don't "believe" anything. I KNOW the awful and horrific things he said that stoked hatred and fear int his country in an attempt to divide and alienate massive portions of it. You would do if you just bothered to check his social media accounts and interviews.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 12 Posted September 12 9 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: I actually don't know much about him, I have learned more in the past few days then in total before, and your response tells what I need. You believe what you have been told and forget doing any of your own research, and anyone who asks for an actual single piece evidence is arguing in bad faith. He did say black people were better off when they had no rights at all. That's pretty stupid. He was a loud mouth and a blowhard, but he was good at it so he was celebrated. Though, like you, I never heard of the guy until after he got whacked
The Frankish Reich Posted September 12 Posted September 12 The facts as we more or less know them: - young male, raised in conservative Mormon family in conservative Mormon area (around St. George, a pleasant retirment-oriented community) - son of a local law enforcement officer. Brought up around guns and hunting, which is not at all unusual, particularly in this part of the country - active on Discord. What forums, who knows. But likely involved in some fringe beliefs. - engraved ammo with some political messages, one clearly anti-"fascist," others difficult to interpret (sarcasm? true belief? who knows) Although he escaped, he seemed to know that he'd be caught. Wore the same clothes home. Confessed to family. Didn't want to go down in a blaze of glory. The rest is pure speculation.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 12 Posted September 12 1 hour ago, BullBuchanan said: No, you absolutely won't. You don't believe in things based on facts, you believe in things based on ideological allegiances. If you need me to point out an example for you of a time when this guy said horrendous things, then you aren't arguing in good faith, because the examples are plentiful and anyone who has even heard of the guy has heard/read them. You have quickly become one of the worst posters on ppp. Congratulations 1
BullBuchanan Posted September 12 Posted September 12 12 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: You have quickly become one of the worst posters on ppp. Congratulations If you don't consider me THE worst, it means I still have a lot of work to do.
SectionC3 Posted September 12 Posted September 12 4 hours ago, SCBills said: People on the left, who think Charlie Kirk was some extremist, are in for a rude awakening. And I’m not saying that’s necessarily a good thing. I’m simply someone on the conservative right that knows Charlie Kirk was amicable, compassionate and one of the bigger conservative forces keeping the new generation of the right at bay. Now he’s gone. And now they’re furious. I was just thinking about that. I didn’t agree with Kirk’s views, but that’s neither here nor there. His death leaves a void that could be filled by someone similar, or by somebody extreme/more extreme, depending on one’s perspective. That might help moderate the country, or it might take it down a really bad path. 2 minutes ago, SCBills said: I assume this is Andrew Tate, who I understand to be a misogynist and bad human. Is that the thumbnail?
Recommended Posts