stevestojan Posted August 6 Posted August 6 The move to the minimum security facility is a brutal look based on the crime she was convicted of. 1
reddogblitz Posted August 6 Posted August 6 9 minutes ago, stevestojan said: The move to the minimum security facility is a brutal look based on the crime she was convicted of. She was already in a low security prison. Based on what she was convicted of how was she not in Sing Sing or a comparable place?
stevestojan Posted August 6 Posted August 6 1 minute ago, reddogblitz said: She was already in a low security prison. Based on what she was convicted of how was she not in Sing Sing or a comparable place? Can’t disagree. Moving her to an even lower security facility is just awful though. 1
Homelander Posted August 6 Author Posted August 6 5 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: She was already in a low security prison. Based on what she was convicted of how was she not in Sing Sing or a comparable place? Previous location: FCI Tallahassee, Florida - a low‑security federal prison with perimeter fencing and a mixed offender population, including sex offenders New location: FPC Bryan, Texas - a minimum-security prison camp for women, dormitory housing, limited or no perimeter fences, and a notably relaxed environment that typically houses non-violent white‑collar offenders such as Elizabeth Holmes and Jen Shah. NOT NORMAL. 1
Homelander Posted August 24 Author Posted August 24 Of course,@BillsFanNC is mad - nothing stings more than getting called out for defending a pedophile
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted August 24 Posted August 24 (edited) 20 hours ago, JDHillFan said: Horrible Fascinating stuff and on-brand for democrats and liberals. WJC, a known predator who preyed on young women, was the hero to the left. His wife and chief enabler who victim shamed was chosen by democrats and liberals at their preferred choice to run the country. When she failed, they chose Joe Biden, a career nitwit with his own issues with inappropriately touching women, a charge he copped to. He was also credibly accused of violent sexual assault, something he did not cop to. When JB was running, his opponent Kamala Harris acknowledged that she believes the women who accused JB of inappropriate touching of females in his orbit. Meanwhile, Kamala Harris was lead on the attempt to eviscerate Brett Kavanaugh over unsubstantiated and frankly silly charges of sexual misconduct from his high school days, yet later agreed to partner with JB in his White House run. So, she targeted a guy who denied wrongdoing with unsubstantiated charges while partnering with a guy who acknowledged inappropriate behavior. Then, she when chosen to succeed the guy who copped to inappropriate touching, she asked the original predator to campaign on her behalf. Wild ride these Dems take, and their base eats it up. Edited August 25 by leh-nerd skin-erd 1 1
JDHillFan Posted August 24 Posted August 24 1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Fascinating stuff and on-brand for democrats and liberals. WJC, a known predator who preyed on young women, was the hero to the left. His wife and chief enabler who victim shamed was chosen by democrats and liberals at their preferred choice to run the country. When she failed, they chose Joe Biden, a career nitwit with his own issues with inappropriately touching women, a charge he copped to. He was also credibly accused of violent sexual assault, something he did not cop to. When JB was running, his opponent Kamala Harris acknowledged that she believes the women who accused JB of inappropriate touching of females in his orbit. Meanwhile, Kamala Harris was lead on the attempt to eviscerate Brett Kavanaugh over unsubstantiated and frankly silly charges of sexual misconduct from his high school days, yet later agreed to partner with JB in his White House run. So, she targeted a guy who denied wrongdoing with unsubstantiated charges while partnering with a guy who acknowledged inappropriate behavior. Then, she when chose to succeed the guy who copped to inappropriate touching, she asked the original predator to campaign on her behalf. Wild ride these Dems take, and their base eats it up. Yes, but TRUMP. 2
CoudyBills Posted August 24 Posted August 24 On 8/5/2025 at 11:22 PM, reddogblitz said: She was already in a low security prison. Based on what she was convicted of how was she not in Sing Sing or a comparable place? SHE...that is why
Homelander Posted August 24 Author Posted August 24 2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Fascinating stuff and on-brand for democrats and liberals. WJC, a known predator who preyed on young women, was the hero to the left. His wife and chief enabler who victim shamed was chosen by democrats and liberals at their preferred choice to run the country. When she failed, they chose Joe Biden, a career nitwit with his own issues with inappropriately touching women, a charge he copped to. He was also credibly accused of violent sexual assault, something he did not cop to. When JB was running, his opponent Kamala Harris acknowledged that she believes the women who accused JB of inappropriate touching of females in his orbit. Meanwhile, Kamala Harris was lead on the attempt to eviscerate Brett Kavanaugh over unsubstantiated and frankly silly charges of sexual misconduct from his high school days, yet later agreed to partner with JB in his White House run. So, she targeted a guy who denied wrongdoing with unsubstantiated charges while partnering with a guy who acknowledged inappropriate behavior. Then, she when chose to succeed the guy who copped to inappropriate touching, she asked the original predator to campaign on her behalf. Wild ride these Dems take, and their base eats it up. Spare us the lecture. The difference is Democrats don’t kneel to politicians like they’re gods - if someone’s guilty, throw them to the wolves. Meanwhile, you and your cult crowned a serial predator, rapist, and Epstein groupie as their messiah, then cheers while he cuts hush-money checks and rants about retribution. You want to talk about a ‘wild ride’? Try watching an entire movement prostitute its soul to defend a filthy criminal just because they’re too cowardly to admit they sold out everything for him.
reddogblitz Posted August 25 Posted August 25 6 hours ago, CoudyBills said: SHE...that is why No it's not. There are plenty of women in maximum security prisons. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Women's_prisons_in_the_United_States
All_Pro_Bills Posted August 25 Posted August 25 (edited) I don't believe much of anything Maxwell is saying to DOJ lawyers. Based on her deposition, she's completely innocent of anything like sex trafficking or soliciting underage women for Epstein. Who by he way, appears to be completely innocent of anything too. At least when it comes to his association with Maxwell. She also believes he didn't commit suicide. Which by extension means she believes somebody killed him, or ordered his killing, Which begs the question who would want to kill Epstien if ther is no there, there? If there is no concern of him spilling the beans on anyone of importance? Add that if everything was on the up-and-up why would he kill himself? Spend a few weeks in jail and then set free? Edited August 25 by All_Pro_Bills
CoudyBills Posted August 25 Posted August 25 13 hours ago, reddogblitz said: No it's not. There are plenty of women in maximum security prisons. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Women's_prisons_in_the_United_States I'm not seeing stats on any of those pages. Where am I supposed to be clicking? This seems like more work than I really want to do, but point me in the right direction. If you have anything that shows women receiving equal sentences, and prison conditions, to men, with regard to sex crimes, I am all for reading that.
Recommended Posts