Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

It will definitely be interesting and do nothing to dispel the scandal.  I'm sure Murdoch has excellent lawyers.  It'll be a fair fight.  The WSJ has the goods or they wouldn't have published the story.


 

They just released “the goods”

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Because he can speak without using a teleprompter. I'm willing to bet both men are unsavory to some extent.

and yet you voted for one that was epsteins good friend, was convicted of rape, ogles his own daughter and has affairs with porn stars.  big fan of lust, greed, wrath, pride, gluttony and envy are you?  not a fan of prudence, justice, temperance, courage, faith, hope and charity?

3 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

They just released “the goods”

 

 

 

wow.  you got me.  I didn't expect anything more.

Posted
15 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

And just like that - the MSM kills the Epstein roll out debacle - which is all this was.  
 


You claim you got goods - you better not bring weak sauce.  This is how Trump only gets stronger.  
 

 

Nice job guys!!  

 

 

 


 

 

Told you this instantly - fake news detector always set to 10.  

  • Disagree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

🎯 

 

Every. Single. Time.

 

Trump's ability to make others destroy themselves is entirely based on the psychology behind power dynamics. 

 

He doesn't defend himself. He might attack the individual, but never when anyone's watching for him to defend himself.

He either deflects or goes quiet, forcing the accuser to go to even greater extremes for their accusations to be heard. 

 

Until the only place left to go is madness, and they dive in headlong.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

An ex federal judge on the grand jury release.  Sounds like nothing of substance will likely be released.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/17/politics/video/former-judge-answers-questions-about-trumps-directive-release-pertinent-testimony-in-epstein-case

1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said:

🎯

 

Every. Single. Time.

 

Trump's ability to make others destroy themselves is entirely based on the psychology behind power dynamics. 

 

He doesn't defend himself. He might attack the individual, but never when anyone's watching for him to defend himself.

He either deflects or goes quiet, forcing the accuser to go to even greater extremes for their accusations to be heard. 

 

Until the only place left to go is madness, and they dive in headlong.

umm, he just defended himself by saying the letter is fake.

Posted
32 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

when did he acknowledge groping?  please provide a link.  Here's one that describes the incidents in question.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/04/joe-biden-inappropriate-touching-accusations-list.html

A long way from defiling teenage girls...

Thank you for providing the link where Biden acknowleged inappropriate touching of females in an attempt to make a human connection in times of comfort by rubbing noses, rubbing the necks of women, running his hands down their backs, and rubbing the thighs of his women because he wanted to.  I used “groped” for efficiency. 

 

Kudos to you, though, Fergie for going to bat for him. On your worst day, I’d find it hard to believe you would rub the backs, necks, thighs and rub noses with your female patients.  Would you defend a colleague who did so? 
 

I agree, btw, that on the perfectly acceptable to morally repugnant scale, what Epstein did was worse and I’d think the victims of Biden’s behavior would likely say the same.  Still, it’s also a long, long way from acceptable behavior but a non-issue for Biden supporters who are suddenly fixated on a story about a potentially fictional birthday card. 

  • Disagree 1
Posted

Trump tried desperately to kill the WSJ story, even though that story is pretty mild. He's absolutely terrified about anything else coming out about his Epstein connection.

 

Is the letter real? Yeah, it's real, and it came (somehow) from Ghislaine Maxwell and her circle. So they have a source, and a source means More to Come. Hence the Trump panic.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted

I don't know, I think the Dems are missing a lot of common sense. I'm having a hard time believing that Jack Smith filed 97 phony indictments against President Trump for complete BS to prevent him from becoming president, but kept Trump's connections to Jeffrey Epstein secret to protect him.

  • Agree 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, SCBills said:

 


Oh man you guys are absolutely flailing. This is delicious stuff. Haven’t seen tears like this since he was found guilty of being a creepy sex pervert. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Thank you for providing the link where Biden acknowleged inappropriate touching of females in an attempt to make a human connection in times of comfort by rubbing noses, rubbing the necks of women, running his hands down their backs, and rubbing the thighs of his women because he wanted to.  I used “groped” for efficiency. 

 

Kudos to you, though, Fergie for going to bat for him. On your worst day, I’d find it hard to believe you would rub the backs, necks, thighs and rub noses with your female patients.  Would you defend a colleague who did so? 
 

I agree, btw, that on the perfectly acceptable to morally repugnant scale, what Epstein did was worse and I’d think the victims of Biden’s behavior would likely say the same.  Still, it’s also a long, long way from acceptable behavior but a non-issue for Biden supporters who are suddenly fixated on a story about a potentially fictional birthday card. 

comparing a doctor patient relationship to a non medical professional trying to soothe a sexual assault victim is absurd, even for you.  Perhaps not the best choice but hardly salacious  Patients sometimes hugged me (both men and women), not the other way around.  I'm not a hugger.   I've seen nurses rubbing necks and backs of distraught patients.  Do you think that's wrong? You used "groped" to sensationalize and you know it.  you're not an honest broker.

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Oh man you guys are absolutely flailing. This is delicious stuff. Haven’t seen tears like this since he was found guilty of being a creepy sex pervert. 


If Trump was involved with Epstein and underage girls, by all means.. I’m here for a JD Vance Presidency. 
 

I far prefer him to Trump. 
 

But this follows a similar pattern thus far and even outlets like WaPo have voiced concerns.  WSJ better produce some corroboration and evidence or they’re about to get yeeted into the sun. 
 

Edited by SCBills
×
×
  • Create New...