JDHillFan Posted July 10 Posted July 10 11 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: But if boots need to be licked, good to know you’ve got it covered. On 11/28/2024 at 8:28 PM, ChiGoose said: It’s almost as if the only way to solve the border issue is through congressional action and that Biden pursued that path (even allowing one of the most conservative senators to write the bill in exchange for propping up our allies) until it became clear that the GOP had no intention on actually solving the crisis when it’s a good election issue for them. But you dopes keep thinking that the president is a king who can solve everything with the wave of a pen. On 4/18/2024 at 8:04 PM, ChiGoose said: The border crisis cannot be solved by executive action. It requires a Congressional solution. Even if Trump wins, he’d still need Congress to send him a bill to sign. Why should anyone give your comments any weight? 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted July 10 Author Posted July 10 Combine massive L takes backed up with massive hubris and you've got the King.
JDHillFan Posted July 10 Posted July 10 4 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: 🤣 Good post. Do you suspect Comey and Brennan were clean in their dealings as it relates to the whole Russia bit? Do you have faith in these lifelong bureaucrats? It’s ok if you do.
nedboy7 Posted July 10 Posted July 10 Just now, JDHillFan said: Good post. Do you suspect Comey and Brennan were clean in their dealings as it relates to the whole Russia bit? Do you have faith in these lifelong bureaucrats? It’s ok if you do. After who trump has pardoned I don’t even give a *****. It’s ok if you do.
JDHillFan Posted July 10 Posted July 10 Just now, nedboy7 said: After who trump has pardoned I don’t even give a *****. It’s ok if you do. As always, you make a well-reasoned argument. I don’t care about potential corruption at the highest levels of the intelligence community because of Trump is an interesting position. 1 1
Homelander Posted July 10 Posted July 10 Just another distraction from the fact that these clowns promised wars would end on day one, none would start under Trump, prices would fall, Medicare and Medicaid would be untouched, and the Epstein files would be released. None of it happened. Now they’ve got to keep the infected distracted because once the outrage dies, the grift is over.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 10 Posted July 10 18 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Smith secured indictments and the prosecutions were shut down not because of legal shortcomings but because of politics. The prosecutions of McCabe couldn’t even get indictments. They were just a stunt for the ignorant. But if boots need to be licked, good to know you’ve got it covered. Imagine, politics and legal matters entwining for the first time in the history of the world. All I can tell you is you put Jack Smith on this latest investigation, it might lead to a Comey Brennan ‘28 ticket. Not because of legal shortcomings but because of…well, you know. Beyond that, it seems that some of you people are coming a bit unglued and offering some weird comments that didn’t come up when Biden was beating up Medicare and wandering off at summits. Where are your personal standards? Is that how you carry yourself at work when you disagree or have an issue with an admin assistant or paralegal? You accuse them of licking boots? When the headset fails in the middle of a phone call with an important client, are you calling the customer service line and demanding they lick your Gucci loafers? Pull it together.
ChiGoose Posted July 10 Posted July 10 6 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Imagine, politics and legal matters entwining for the first time in the history of the world. All I can tell you is you put Jack Smith on this latest investigation, it might lead to a Comey Brennan ‘28 ticket. Not because of legal shortcomings but because of…well, you know. Beyond that, it seems that some of you people are coming a bit unglued and offering some weird comments that didn’t come up when Biden was beating up Medicare and wandering off at summits. Where are your personal standards? Is that how you carry yourself at work when you disagree or have an issue with an admin assistant or paralegal? You accuse them of licking boots? When the headset fails in the middle of a phone call with an important client, are you calling the customer service line and demanding they lick your Gucci loafers? Pull it together. Frankly, I would question someone if they came to me arguing that Apples = Oranges.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 10 Posted July 10 24 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Frankly, I would question someone if they came to me arguing that Apples = Oranges. I wasn’t talking about questions on apples v oranges, and of course you know that. It’s all good though, sometimes people surprise you. Have a good night.
BillsFanNC Posted July 10 Author Posted July 10 These were all just honest mistakes. The FBI has committed to fixing things going forward. - The King 😂
ChiGoose Posted July 10 Posted July 10 26 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I wasn’t talking about questions on apples v oranges, and of course you know that. It’s all good though, sometimes people surprise you. Have a good night. I mean, if you’re comparing the McCabe prosecution to the Smith ones (which you did), you absolutely were.
All_Pro_Bills Posted July 10 Posted July 10 (edited) 2 hours ago, ChiGoose said: Smith secured indictments and the prosecutions were shut down not because of legal shortcomings but because of politics. The prosecutions of McCabe couldn’t even get indictments. They were just a stunt for the ignorant. But if boots need to be licked, good to know you’ve got it covered. We don't know what specific legal arguments Smith was prepared to present but let's not recognize the case was dropped because of politics and pretend politics didn't have anything to do with the charges. Plainly, Democrats were willing to go to great lengths to disqualify Trump from running and its obvious why. All those cases had the stench of political motivation. Like those photos of "top secret" documents scattered on the floor. Bush league level theater and completely unprofessional. I'm quite disappointed in Patel and Bongino. Both claimed to know where all the bodies are buried. So start digging. To this point these Wolves have acted more like Lambs. Lots of talk and no action. If they have legitimate evidence get on with it. Edited July 10 by All_Pro_Bills
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 10 Posted July 10 8 hours ago, ChiGoose said: I mean, if you’re comparing the McCabe prosecution to the Smith ones (which you did), you absolutely were. I was comparing outcomes, and your comments regarding apples, oranges, legal v political were fine. Your comment regarding a “stunt for ignorant” was standard fare from the typical Biden voter who fancies himself enlightened in spite of…well, well, just about everything Joe Biden. You didn’t stop there, though, and shared some graphic mental imagery regarding boot licking. While I have no doubt you would hold court on “apples v oranges”, the question is really would you characterize someone you disagreed with as a boot licker at the office? At a neighborhood block party? When ordering a coffee at Dunkin’? Oh—when working out at the local gym—would you tell the guy on the bench press who lingered a bit to “Get it moving, ya damn boot licker?”. I think you probably wouldn’t. For some reason here, in a silly conversation about political prosecutions in one of the dirtiest and grimiest political places on the planet, you felt it appropriate. 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 10 Posted July 10 9 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: We don't know what specific legal arguments Smith was prepared to present but let's not recognize the case was dropped because of politics and pretend politics didn't have anything to do with the charges. Plainly, Democrats were willing to go to great lengths to disqualify Trump from running and it’s obvious why. All those cases had the stench of political motivation. Like those photos of "top secret" documents scattered on the floor. Bush league level theater and completely unprofessional. Of course they do. The notion that additional time, dialogue and negotiation was an option v an armed raid is discounted. As does the fact that after multiple hours and complete control of the premises, the DOJ allegedly grabbed tax information and correspondence between Trump and his attorney. Thereafter, the resistance of the DOJ to the notion of an impartial Special Master to weed through the data was a red flag. I think Chi will argue that this is simply a reflection of the purity of the law, the essential application of the hand of justice. I’d argue that the application of simple, honest and straightforward event management would include dialogue about how to avoid any appearance of impropriety. On the other hand, it turned out that the Smith approach likely led, at least in part, to Trump return to the White House. In that regard, the Chi’s of the world played a key role in that. 9 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: I'm quite disappointed in Patel and Bongino. Both claimed to know where all the bodies are buried. So start digging. To this point these Wolves have acted more like Lambs. Lots of talk and no action. If they have legitimate evidence get on with it. Complete clusterf*ck.
BillsFanNC Posted July 10 Author Posted July 10 I have been and remain skeptical that anything will happen to the big players in the Russia hoax. That there's an "investigation" into these two treasonous clowns being leaked independently to multiple outlets from this FBI does indicate that something is brewing however. The information wars continue. You must beat them at their own game.
wnyguy Posted July 10 Posted July 10 11 hours ago, Homelander said: Just another distraction from the fact that these clowns promised wars would end on day one, none would start under Trump, prices would fall, Medicare and Medicaid would be untouched, and the Epstein files would be released. None of it happened. Now they’ve got to keep the infected distracted because once the outrage dies, the grift is over. Ya know Billsy, you are right. I will not be voting for Trump again in the next election, that bastard. 1
BillsFanNC Posted July 10 Author Posted July 10 Now another source familiar with the HPSCI staff report has told The Federalist that the analysts who actually drafted the ICA report for Brennan are still with the CIA — some maybe even having been promoted after compiling the faulty report in violation of standard operating procedures. It seems unlikely, however, that Director Ratcliffe will be content with outing the big names, while leaving the minions in place. In fact, the most obvious explanation for Director Ratcliffe’s failure to release the HPSCI staff report or to include the extensive details of corruption from that report in the CIA analysis of the ICA, is that the investigation is still ongoing. 1
Recommended Posts