Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Sounds like the protest last week should have been called. "No kings unless I agree with the politics." Where are all of those protestors in responses to Obama's statement? Or was it only partisan and political?

Edited by dgrochester55
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

Ya, it's real hateful and authoritarian how he calls for the first amendment to be followed. Makes his sound like Hitler or something! 

 

:doh:


 

Trump should immediately create a ministry of truth.  
 

Oversee every single “news” outlet.  
 

Just like the 1st amendment intended.  

Posted
1 minute ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

Dumb idea, so what? Hardly "authoritarian" 

 

 


 

I want the View canceled immediately or I’m not donating for the mid terms.  
 

 

And John Oliver - deport him to while they’re at it.  
 

 

We don’t need hate American liars here on TV 24/7.  It’s just wrong.  

Posted
3 hours ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

Ya, it's real hateful and authoritarian how he calls for the first amendment to be followed. Makes his sound like Hitler or something! 

 

:doh:

It’s interesting that a guy who lead the free world for 8 years and is known for his eloquence struggled to find the words to describe his version of government regulated free speech.  
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
11 hours ago, nedboy7 said:

Big Ditz talking about authoritarianism.  What a comedy on here. 

That's your response?  What a ***** loser.  Zero integrity piece of human *****.  

Posted
10 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

It’s interesting that a guy who lead the free world for 8 years and is known for his eloquence struggled to find the words to describe his version of government regulated free speech.  
 

 

Ya, scary suspicious! 

Posted (edited)

Obama's an off the shelf lib narcissist intellectual type that thinks he's always the smartest guy in the room.  

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
4 hours ago, CoudyBills said:

That's your response?  What a ***** loser.  Zero integrity piece of human *****.  

 

Par for the nedboi course.

Posted
6 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Obama's an off the shelf lib narcissist intellectual type that thinks he's always the smartest guy in the room.  

 

MAGA is so scared of intelligence.  Thus Trump.  

Posted
21 hours ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

Ya, it's real hateful and authoritarian how he calls for the first amendment to be followed. Makes his sound like Hitler or something! 

 

:doh:

 

How is a politician, or an authority appointed by a politician (same difference), choosing what is "truth" or a "fact" in any way shape or form following the 1st amendment?

 

The 1st amendment says the politicians don't get to choose what others are allowed to say or believe.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Taro T said:

 

How is a politician, or an authority appointed by a politician (same difference), choosing what is "truth" or a "fact" in any way shape or form following the 1st amendment?

 

The 1st amendment says the politicians don't get to choose what others are allowed to say or believe.

He didn't lay out a plan, and did say it would be experimental, but what are you talking about with the government deciding what is truth or not? They do that all the time. Slander is a crime, for instance that a judge (appointed government official) can make decisions on. Businesses are sued over lies and misleading advertising. 

 

Come on, up your game buddy 🤣

Posted
17 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

He didn't lay out a plan, and did say it would be experimental, but what are you talking about with the government deciding what is truth or not? They do that all the time. Slander is a crime, for instance that a judge (appointed government official) can make decisions on. Businesses are sued over lies and misleading advertising. 

 

Come on, up your game buddy 🤣

 

NEITHER of which are even close to the government deciding what truths are allowed to be stated and which aren't.  Which is what 44 is calling for.  Having the ability to deplatform positions the government finds "inconvenient" is what they really want.

 

And remember, though your favorites propose such things, were they enacted today the guy you can't stand would be the one choosing who the arbiters of truth are.  You SURE you're really ok with that?

×
×
  • Create New...