nedboy7 Posted June 5 Posted June 5 This is where pedofile worshiping Trumpers come to discuss twitter posts. 🤩 3
Albwan Posted June 5 Posted June 5 You've chosen to ignore content by Roundybout. Options You've chosen to ignore content by nedboy7. Options HAY GAIS LOOK AT ME IM PROTESTING BY TROLLING ON A FOOTBALL FAN FORUM 1 1
JDHillFan Posted June 5 Posted June 5 1 hour ago, nedboy7 said: This is where pedofile worshiping Trumpers come to discuss twitter posts. 🤩 This would have been one of your better posts if not for the amateurish attempt at spelling pedophile. 2
The Frankish Reich Posted June 6 Author Posted June 6 7 hours ago, JDHillFan said: This would have been one of your better posts if not for the amateurish attempt at spelling pedophile. I thought he was referring to the Epstein Pedo Files. 1
AverageAllensSuspensor Posted June 6 Posted June 6 8 hours ago, Albwan said: You've chosen to ignore content by Roundybout. Options You've chosen to ignore content by nedboy7. Options HAY GAIS LOOK AT ME IM PROTESTING BY TROLLING ON A FOOTBALL FAN FORUM The truth hurts? Huvudet på spiken, så att säga. Hey guys. Look at me. I am protesting people calling me out by advertising my ignores on a football fan forum! 1 1
4th&long Posted June 6 Posted June 6 12 hours ago, JDHillFan said: This would have been one of your better posts if not for the amateurish attempt at spelling pedophile. We're still waiting on a good post from you. Keep trying, I'm sure you'll get there.
BillsFanNC Posted June 6 Posted June 6 16 hours ago, Mikie2times said: The these posts overwhelm every topic. If I wanted to read twitter I would go to twitter. If that's just what this place will always be so be it. Hey, you've got Finding behind you. So you've got that going for you, which is nice. You can stick with the intellectually honest back and forth of how reliable the media is and how Biden remained mentally fit for his entire term. A thousand Catturd tweets in a row doesn't begin to sniff that track record of stupidity. 1
sherpa Posted June 6 Posted June 6 I don't have a dog in this fight, but there is an observation I would make relating to these X links. Very frequently they are from people that nobody has ever heard of, and generally for good reason. The links are always in support of the poster's underlying view. The problem is that they are rarely credible and contain vies and judgements that are ridiculous, with near complete ignorance of the subjects and context of what they suggest. I only say this regarding those I have noticed on issues I think I am quite familiar with. When I read those, I frequently find myself shaking my head and being amazed at the ignorance. 1 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted June 6 Posted June 6 1 minute ago, sherpa said: I don't have a dog in this fight, but there is an observation I would make relating to these X links. Very frequently they are from people that nobody has ever heard of, and generally for good reason. The links are always in support of the poster's underlying view. The problem is that they are rarely credible and contain vies and judgements that are ridiculous, with near complete ignorance of the subjects and context of what they suggest. I only say this regarding those I have noticed on issues I think I am quite familiar with. When I read those, I frequently find myself shaking my head and being amazed at the ignorance. I agree mostly, so it then becomes a question of letting posters lay out their ignorance in their own words or farm it out to those in the X sphere. What's the difference? When everyone became expert virologists and immunologists during covid changed the entire game. When morons who couldn't tell you the difference between IgG and IgM are telling you at the same time that the science is settled and must be followed is when I knew that I can declare myself to be an expert in anything at all.
sherpa Posted June 6 Posted June 6 1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said: I agree mostly, so it then becomes a question of letting posters lay out their ignorance in their own words or farm it out to those in the X sphere. What's the difference? The difference is the reader's subjective response to whether such claims are justified. There is some implied suggestion of credibility when these no names/no knowledge sources post some giant X view. A poster doesn't get that same response, and believing some ignorant goof simply because it's an X post is a really bad idea.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted June 6 Posted June 6 16 hours ago, nedboy7 said: This is where pedofile worshiping Trumpers come to discuss twitter posts. 🤩 Not sure what's sadder, this post or the people who liked it. Pathetic as always ned.
BillsFanNC Posted June 6 Posted June 6 18 minutes ago, sherpa said: The difference is the reader's subjective response to whether such claims are justified. There is some implied suggestion of credibility when these no names/no knowledge sources post some giant X view. A poster doesn't get that same response, and believing some ignorant goof simply because it's an X post is a really bad idea. Is it any worse than parroting what some ignorant goof at CNN or the WH press room tells you to believe about Biden's mental health or the efficacy of the vaccine? Everyone's takes are informed by what they consume in media, X, the scientific literature etc. You're FAR better off these days being informed by X sources, actual X alternative news sources, than legacy media. And it's not even close. 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted June 6 Posted June 6 How dare anyone post X links! And often they are LINKS to actual news articles btw. Sometimes people like B man and myself are kind enough to quote the article to save those arduous clicks too. Would you have been better informed by all of legacy media telling you not to believe your lying eyes for FOUR YEARS or maybe following real journalists that you can find on X? Again, the rise of X as a news source is largely BECAUSE people grew tired of being lied to constantly by legacy media. They made their own bed. 2
Mikie2times Posted June 6 Posted June 6 13 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Is it any worse than parroting what some ignorant goof at CNN or the WH press room tells you to believe about Biden's mental health or the efficacy of the vaccine? Everyone's takes are informed by what they consume in media, X, the scientific literature etc. You're FAR better off these days being informed by X sources, actual X alternative news sources, than legacy media. And it's not even close. They have no basic guardrail to be truthful or even accurate and have no standard that they're being held to. Compared to traditional media that your holding to standard of absolute truth. So when traditional media lies or gets it wrong you say, SEE, Bill___ on X is more credible. Meanwhile nobody has ever looked at a single thing that user said and if it has any accuracy. Most of these posts are the equivalent of Facebook posts. They're random people's opinions. It's not news but people here post them to try to give credibility to a view. 1 2 1
sherpa Posted June 6 Posted June 6 27 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Is it any worse than parroting what some ignorant goof at CNN or the WH press room tells you to believe about Biden's mental health or the efficacy of the vaccine? Everyone's takes are informed by what they consume in media, X, the scientific literature etc. You're FAR better off these days being informed by X sources, actual X alternative news sources, than legacy media. And it's not even close. That's fine. I'm just saying buyer beware after reading scores of nonsense from X people who lead with opinion against zero knowledge of existing situations, any acknowledgement of the other point of view, history or current context. And no credit goes to mainstream either, but they are a bit more disciplined as there are ways to get at them if wrong. To each his own. 1
BillsFanNC Posted June 6 Posted June 6 2 minutes ago, Mikie2times said: They have no basic guardrail to be truthful or even accurate and have no standard that they're being held to. Compared to traditional media that your holding to standard of absolute truth. So when traditional media lies or gets it wrong you say, SEE, Bill___ on X is more credible. Meanwhile nobody has ever looked at a single thing that user said and if it has any accuracy. Most of these posts are the equivalent of Facebook posts. They're random people's opinions. It's not news but people here post them to try to give credibility to a view. Again. SO WHAT? There's 12 regular posters here. So what if someone linked to another take to add from X? It's not as if it's not easy for anyone to distinguish between X posts that are individual opinions and those that are news articles that you can dig deeper into. And guardrails? 😂 You're talking about guardrails as if the legacy media didn't nuke those same guardrails, grind them up and spit on it's grave. 1
Mikie2times Posted June 6 Posted June 6 6 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Again. SO WHAT? There's 12 regular posters here. So what if someone linked to another take to add from X? It's not as if it's not easy for anyone to distinguish between X posts that are individual opinions and those that are news articles that you can dig deeper into. And guardrails? 😂 You're talking about guardrails as if the legacy media didn't nuke those same guardrails, grind them up and spit on it's grave. Why do you think that is? I post how cool I am. Then I post my moms X account that says I'm cool. I do that 4-5 time a day in every thread. Why would anybody come here for decent conversations or to discuss actual events? You keep minimizing this place saying nobody comes here and it's a cesspool. Yet don't see the connection with your behavior and why this place only has 12 posters and is a cesspool. 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted June 6 Posted June 6 1 hour ago, Mikie2times said: Why do you think that is? I post how cool I am. Then I post my moms X account that says I'm cool. I do that 4-5 time a day in every thread. Why would anybody come here for decent conversations or to discuss actual events? You keep minimizing this place saying nobody comes here and it's a cesspool. Yet don't see the connection with your behavior and why this place only has 12 posters and is a cesspool. This back and forth discussion is working so great. You've listened and responded to my point with great attention to detail. Productive! I don't know how I can be any clearer. But maybe I can create an X account and then post my thoughts in a tweet and then link here since you seem to pay close attention to those. Your gripes have been the same gripes but with a different flavor since the dawn of PPP. It's never going to change. It has absolutely zero to do with X posts. As I stated in my first response to you, you are more than welcome to leave if you don't like it. Or you can stay and be the change man. It will work! As to why there are only about 12 regular posters here now? Ask the 25 or so who left about five years ago to create their own board. 1
Albwan Posted June 6 Posted June 6 (edited) 12 hours ago, AverageAllensSuspensor said: The truth hurts? Huvudet på spiken, så att säga. Hey guys. Look at me. I am protesting people calling me out by advertising my ignores on a football fan forum! ever hear of the ignore button jackass?..use it. it saves me the energy never mind, I got you. Edited June 6 by Albwan
Doc Brown Posted June 7 Posted June 7 (edited) On 6/5/2025 at 2:22 PM, Mikie2times said: The these posts overwhelm every topic. If I wanted to read twitter I would go to twitter. If that's just what this place will always be so be it. It is a slight annoyance in this section compared to TSW with the overabundance of tweets. Maybe one of our 10 embedded tweets are informative and I usually just skip by them. This place would be better if you had like a two embedded tweet/article link quota per user a day. Use your tweets wisely. Although a guy with a shirt off with the X handle @zerohedge could be the next Woodward and Berstein for all we know. Edited June 7 by Doc Brown
Recommended Posts