BringBackFergy Posted March 26 Author Share Posted March 26 11 hours ago, LABILLBACKER said: Diggs will need to be replaced very soon. We have no legit WR2 either. And Cook can't catch a ball to save his life. Those are 3 big issues. I'm tired of waiting around for this braintrust to get it right defensively. Especially in the playoffs. We need 2 more WRS, then you can go crazy again drafting failed defensive players all you want. Lemme guess. We need a WR who runs a 4.3 40 yd dash, is versatile and experienced like Tyreek? We already have him - Samuel. And before you start in with the “Noooo, a tall receiver”…Diggs ain’t no behemoth. And we have Kincaid. Prepare to be disappointed on Draft night. Just remember…all the “Rosen-ettes” who were disappointed we didn’t draft the most pro ready QB when we took Allen, this will be the same craziness. We’ll get our new WR later in Day 2. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T master Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 I'm not sure i agree . Given what a lot of the experts are saying that will be available at the WR position and those being of a elite type of players going forward into the future to give Josh a weapon he can depend on they should get 1 early because Diggs isn't getting any younger and there are those that they don't know how they will work out . So get 1 while the getting is good . 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigK14094 Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 Shorter has not played a down. Don't know how anybody could include him in the all set WR room justification. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logic Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 On 3/25/2024 at 7:51 PM, BringBackFergy said: Prepare to be disappointed on Draft night. Just remember…all the “Rosen-ettes” who were disappointed we didn’t draft the most pro ready QB when we took Allen, this will be the same craziness. We’ll get our new WR later in Day 2. I feel like you're changing your tune a little bit. I believe you said in the OP that we were "all set at WR" and would "maybe grab one in round 6". Now you're saying we'll draft one in round 2 or 3? If the Bills do that, they certainly don't share your belief that we are "set" at WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted March 27 Author Share Posted March 27 3 hours ago, Logic said: I feel like you're changing your tune a little bit. I believe you said in the OP that we were "all set at WR" and would "maybe grab one in round 6". Now you're saying we'll draft one in round 2 or 3? If the Bills do that, they certainly don't share your belief that we are "set" at WR. I may have exaggerated. To be sure, there will be no WR in Round 1 (according to my sources). Probably Round 3 or 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jokeman Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 4 minutes ago, BringBackFergy said: I may have exaggerated. To be sure, there will be no WR in Round 1 (according to my sources). Probably Round 3 or 4. Did your sources how we're going to acquire a 3rd round pick? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted March 27 Author Share Posted March 27 8 minutes ago, The Jokeman said: Did your sources how we're going to acquire a 3rd round pick? Trade down. Acquire a 3rd round pick. Is this too complex? C’mon man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBills808 Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 this is a worse idea than playing the back 9 w one shoe 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.