Corrupt J6 Committee: Hides testimony of Trump WH authorizing 10,000 NG, DC mayor & DOD blocked it.

[BillsFanNC]

You remember Anthony Ornato, right? He was supposedly Cassidy Hutchinson's "source" who said that Trump lunged for the steering wheel to try to get to the Capitol on J6....

 

 

Well that fairytale nonsense is also put to bed with this previously hidden testimony now seeing the light of day. Tldr; Trumps handlers had decided days before that he wouldn't go to the Capitol.

 

But on to the the national guard issue....

 

Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato’s first transcribed interview with the committee was conducted on January 28, 2022. In it, he told Cheney and her investigators that he overheard White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows push Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser to request as many National Guard troops as she needed to protect the city.

 

....

 

All of the transcripts will be released by September  2022, right King? 

 

However, transcripts of fewer than half of the 1,000 interviews the committee claims it conducted are posted on that site. It is unclear how many of the hidden transcripts include exonerating information suppressed by the committee.

 

 

A January 6 committee staffer asked Ornato, “When it comes to the National Guard statement about having 10,000 troops or any other number of troops, do you recall any discussion prior to the 6th about whether and how many National Guard troops to deploy on January 6th?”

 

Ornato surprised the committee by noting he did recall a conversation between Meadows and Bowser: “He was on the phone with her and wanted to make sure she had everything that she needed,” Ornato told investigators.

 

 

 

Edited March 9 by BillsFanNC

[BillsFanNC]

 

[BillsFanNC]

 

[BillsFanNC]

Oh...and Kash Patel also testified under oath to these very same details? 

 

You dont say.

 

Cmon, King why don't you remind us about how testimony under oath is so important.  They wouldn't lie and risk perjury!

 

Why haven't Ornato and Patel been charged?

 

 

 

Edited March 9 by BillsFanNC

[BillsFanNC]

 

[BillStime]

All @BillsFanNC does is lie - another desperate attempt to deflect from the most corrupt former POTUS in our lifetime.

 

 

[njbuff]

^^^^^
 

That’s funny. You calling others liars when you’re the biggest scumbag liar on here.

[BillStime]

2 minutes ago, njbuff said:

^^^^^
 

That’s funny. You calling others liars when you’re the biggest scumbag liar on here.

Awe - Trumpy sad.

 

 

 

[njbuff]

2 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Awe - Trumpy sad.

 

 

 

I’m sad?

 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[BillsFanNC]

So a transcript is revealed from the J6 committee,  that for some reason they kept hidden from the public record about the National Guard, the White House and J6.

 

This transcript reveals testimony from a Trump white house official that corroborates previous claims and testimony that the Trump white house did indeed authorize up to 10k national guard troops for J6.

 

Keep in mind once again that this testimony was kept hidden from the public until yesterday.

 

Given these facts Billsfuk.c is claiming that the messenger is lying?

 

 

Well golly gee....

 

Next you'll tell me that water is wet and that Billsfuk.c is a useful idiot.

[njbuff]

1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said:

So a transcript is revealed from the J6 committee,  that for some reason they kept hidden from the public record about the National Guard, the White House and J6.

 

This transcript reveals testimony from a Trump white house official that corroborates previous claims and testimony that the Trump white house did indeed authorize up to 10k national guard troops for J6.

 

Keep in mind once again that this testimony was kept hidden from the public until yesterday.

 

Given these facts Billsfuk.c is claiming that the messenger is lying?

 

 

Well golly gee....

 

Next you'll tell me that water is wet and that Billsfuk.c is a useful idiot.

Anything positive for Trump is a lie and anything that is negative is the truth according to b!tchSlime.

[BillStime]

 

[Capco]

Which National Guard units would have been deployed to the Capitol?

EDIT:  Nm, it would've been the DC National Guard, which is under direct control of the POTUS.

Edited March 9 by Capco

[BillsFanNC]

Water is wet and Bilksfuk.c cherry picks edited video?

 

NFW!

 

For the 1000th time Trump, or any POTUS, does not have the authority TO DEPLOY THE ***** NATIONAL GUARD UNILATERALLY. 

 

He can only authorize it, which he did. In order to deploy the NG, LOCAL AUTHORITIES have to make an official request.

 

In this case it required either the DC mayor or official at the Capitol to MAKE THAT REQUEST.

 

The DC mayor and the officials at the Capitol DECLINED requesting the NG MULTIPLE TIMES.

 

 

 

[BillStime]

 

8 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

Cassidy Hutchinson's "source"

 

WAIT JUST A MIN - remember when the cult told us that Cassidy’s testimony can’t be trusted because it was based on HEARSAY?

 

👆

Wait for it 

👇

 

On 8/15/2022 at 3:27 PM, BillsFanNC said:

You want to contradict Cassidy Hutchison?

 

Get some other low level WH staffer to testify under oath by using the hearsay qualifier "I heard Mr. or Ms. so and so say something to the effect of.....that President Trump did X" in all of their responses.

 

Boom.  Contradicted by more hearsay.

👆

Wait for it 

👇

 

On 8/15/2022 at 3:32 PM, Doc said:

Yes, they'll tell what actually happened that day, not what someone heard from someone else at 31 Flavors.  Which would go to the credibility of her (entirely) hearsay "testimony."  And that's why they won't call them.

👆

Wait for it 

👇

 

8 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

with the committee was conducted on January 28, 2022. In it, he told Cheney and her investigators that he OVERHEARD White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows push Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser to request as many National Guard troops as she needed to protect the city.

Sooooooooooo hearsay is only deemed appropriate when approved by the cult.

 

GTFOH - jfc - lmao

 

 

These idiots never fkn think 

 

 

[Capco]

6 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

For the 1000th time Trump, or any POTUS, does not have the authority TO DEPLOY THE ***** NATIONAL GUARD UNILATERALLY. 

 

He can only authorize it, which he did. In order to deploy the NG, LOCAL AUTHORITIES have to make an official request.

That's not entirely true.  The POTUS may mobilize the NG for domestic law enforcement purposes under Title 10 via powers granted in the Insurrection Act.  For example, this was done during the 1992 Los Angeles Riots.  

In addition, the DC NG is a special exception to this.  The POTUS or the Commanding General has the discretion to deploy them locally; the POTUS is the DC equivalent of the governor of a state.  The mayor of DC does not possess this authority, and hence does not have the ability to prevent the activation of the DC NG simply by foregoing a formal request.  

Also, the DC NG was estimated to only have 2,500 troops in its ranks on September 30, 2020.  

[BillsFanNC]

1 hour ago, Capco said:

That's not entirely true.  The POTUS may mobilize the NG for domestic law enforcement purposes under Title 10 via powers granted in the Insurrection Act.  For example, this was done during the 1992 Los Angeles Riots.  

In addition, the DC NG is a special exception to this.  The POTUS or the Commanding General has the discretion to deploy them locally; the POTUS is the DC equivalent of the governor of a state.  The mayor of DC does not possess this authority, and hence does not have the ability to prevent the activation of the DC NG simply by foregoing a formal request.  

Also, the DC NG was estimated to only have 2,500 troops in its ranks on September 30, 2020.  

 

Thus it wasn't the DC NG being made available for J6. They were brought in from across the nation.

 

Kash Patel, who was at DOD, has testified to these facts under oath to both the J6 committee and in the CO 14th ammendment case.

 

Forget all this for a moment and imagine if Trump actually did mobilize the NG...

 

He was being encouraged to do so when the Federal Court house in Portland was under nightly attack for months. Remember Pelosi's storm troopers BS?

 

 

[BillStime]

2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

Water is wet and Bilksfuk.c cherry picks edited video?

 

NFW!

 

For the 1000th time Trump, or any POTUS, does not have the authority TO DEPLOY THE ***** NATIONAL GUARD UNILATERALLY. 

 

He can only authorize it, which he did. In order to deploy the NG, LOCAL AUTHORITIES have to make an official request.

 

In this case it required either the DC mayor or official at the Capitol to MAKE THAT REQUEST.

 

The DC mayor and the officials at the Capitol DECLINED requesting the NG MULTIPLE TIMES.

Delete this thread - there is nothing credible about this “witness” - you are embarrassing yourself.

 

 

 

[Capco]

58 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Thus it wasn't the DC NG being made available for J6. They were brought in from across the nation.

 

Kash Patel, who was at DOD, has testified to these facts under oath to both the J6 committee and in the CO 14th ammendment case.

 

Forget all this for a moment and imagine if Trump actually did mobilize the NG...

 

He was being encouraged to do so when the Federal Court house in Portland was under nightly attack for months. Remember Pelosi's storm troopers BS?

 

He's either forgetting that there are numerous exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act (PCA), or blatantly lying about it.  Both Title 32 and Title 10 provide for those exceptions in addition to state active duty being excluded.

He's also forgetting (or lying about) the mayor of DC or Capitol police as being required to request the assistance.  In DC, it's the POTUS that has this local authority.  

There are 3 avenues for NG activation: 

1.  state governors (or, in the case of DC, the POTUS) can activate them locally during a declared state of emergency;
2.  state governors (or, in the case of DC, the POTUS) can request the NG to be funded/supported federally under Title 32, pending POTUS/SECDEF approval and gubernatorial consent;
3.  NG units can be federalized under Title 10 in cases of war or national emergencies declared by either Congress, POTUS, or SECDEF.


NG units do not have domestic law enforcement powers under Title 10 unless the Insurrection Act is invoked, and presidential discretion is quite broad on this point.

Use of Militia and Armed Forces to Enforce Federal Authority.
Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, assemblages, or rebellion make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any state or territory, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any state. This is a statutory exception to the PCA.

Interference with State and Federal law.
The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a state, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy.

Air and Army National Guard.
Air and Army National Guard can specifically be called into Federal service in case of invasion, rebellion, or inability to execute Federal law with active forces.

So, Trump could have used the first avenue unilaterally for the DC NG, then used Title 32 unilaterally to give them unlimited federal funding/support by approving his own request.  Or he could have used Title 10 by unilaterally declaring a national emergency, invoking the Insurrection Act, and using as many NG units from other states as he wished.

This idea that the other lesser officials noted in the tweet effectively blocked deployment of the NG is patently false.  

[BillsFanNC]

3 hours ago, Capco said:

He's either forgetting that there are numerous exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act (PCA), or blatantly lying about it.  Both Title 32 and Title 10 provide for those exceptions in addition to state active duty being excluded.

He's also forgetting (or lying about) the mayor of DC or Capitol police as being required to request the assistance.  In DC, it's the POTUS that has this local authority.  

There are 3 avenues for NG activation: 

1.  state governors (or, in the case of DC, the POTUS) can activate them locally during a declared state of emergency;
2.  state governors (or, in the case of DC, the POTUS) can request the NG to be funded/supported federally under Title 32, pending POTUS/SECDEF approval and gubernatorial consent;
3.  NG units can be federalized under Title 10 in cases of war or national emergencies declared by either Congress, POTUS, or SECDEF.


NG units do not have domestic law enforcement powers under Title 10 unless the Insurrection Act is invoked, and presidential discretion is quite broad on this point.

Use of Militia and Armed Forces to Enforce Federal Authority.
Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, assemblages, or rebellion make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any state or territory, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any state. This is a statutory exception to the PCA.

Interference with State and Federal law.
The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a state, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy.

Air and Army National Guard.
Air and Army National Guard can specifically be called into Federal service in case of invasion, rebellion, or inability to execute Federal law with active forces.

So, Trump could have used the first avenue unilaterally for the DC NG, then used Title 32 unilaterally to give them unlimited federal funding/support by approving his own request.  Or he could have used Title 10 by unilaterally declaring a national emergency, invoking the Insurrection Act, and using as many NG units from other states as he wished.

This idea that the other lesser officials noted in the tweet effectively blocked deployment of the NG is patently false.  

 

If Patel lied, under oath, twice, then he'd certainly have been charged already by this corrupt DOJ. 

 

Concern about clashes between Trump supporters and antifa doesn't qualify under any of the scenarios you cite. Again, if Trump called up the NG, on J3 before anything happened....well I think we all know how that narrative would play out.

 

Storm troopers, dictator, etc.. You know the drill.

 

Trump pre authorized calling up the NG. If Mayor Bowsers request for the NG wasn't required to deploy, then it's curious why she would specifically deny her ability to request the NG in writing.

 

Same with House and Senate sergeants at arms. It's in memos that they specifically denied NG help. 

 

Additionally why hide the testimony that Trump approved the NG? If he could have simply done it all on his own, then testimony that he approved the NG and then didn't follow through on it would only help the J6 committee narrative. 

 

Capitol police chief Steven Sund would also like to know why his numerous calls to approve the NG went unanswered....for 71 minutes on J6 as the Capitol was being overrun.

 

 

[BillStime]

Karen tries so hard... lmao

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

 

 

 

[BillStime]

 

lmao

 

 

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

Seems to me that a committee that was laser focused on the truth would call for an exhaustive review of law enforcement response to the gravest threat to our democracy since the Civil War. 

 

Oh they did none of that?

 

Carry on.

 

 

[Westside]

2 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Seems to me that a committee that was laser focused on the truth would call for an exhaustive review of law enforcement response to the gravest threat to our democracy since the Civil War. 

 

Oh they did none of that?

 

Carry on.

 

 

They planned for and wanted an insurrection by the right. When it didn’t happen, they hid their agenda and punished trespassers with cruel and unusual punishment. Then the left tried to hide any evidence that might expose their sinister actions!

[BillStime]

This thread still exists?

 

Desperate times, Karen.

 

You seem panicked - lmao

[BillStime]

On 3/9/2024 at 9:49 AM, BillsFanNC said:

Oh...and Kash Patel also testified under oath to these very same details? 

 

Oh, Karen - from the DC National Guards website:
 

Today’s D.C. National Guard remains strong with more than 2,700 Soldiers and Airmen available to execute its missions. D.C. National Guard Soldiers and Airmen resides within the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia, and are proud to be from the communities in which we protect and serve.  

 

The D.C National Guard was formed in 1802 by President Thomas Jefferson to defend the newly created District of Columbia. As such, the Commanding General of the D.C. National Guard is subordinate solely to the President of the United States.  This authority to activate the D.C. National Guard has been delegated, by the President, to the Secretary of Defense and further delegated to the Secretary of the Army.  The D.C. National Guard is the only National Guard unit, out of all of the 54 states and territories, which reports only to the President. 
 

So, not only does the DC National Guard not have 10,000 troops - their own websites disputes all the “FACTS” that Karen has been spewing about who is responsible for what. 

All they do is lie and trip over their own f’ psyops —> FACT

[B-Man]

 

 

HIDDEN J6 TESTIMONY REVEALED: Zachary Steiber’s report raises two huge questions regarding the events leading up to the January 6, 2021, riot:

 

Question 1: Why did the Democrats January 6 select committee claim it “found no evidence” that then-President Donald Trump offered to get 10,000 National Guard troops for the Mayor of D.C. when the committee heard direct testimony that Trump did make that offer and it was rejected?

 

 

Question 2: Does this evidence that the Democrats January 6 select committee hid from the American public tell us why Trump has never been charged with inciting insurrection????

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/hidden-jan-6-transcript-revealed-undermining-house-committees-claim-5604862?

 

.

[BillsFanNC]

Just now, B-Man said:

 

 

HIDDEN J6 TESTIMONY REVEALED: Zachary Steiber’s report raises two huge questions regarding the events leading up to the January 6, 2021, riot:

 

Question 1: Why did the Democrats January 6 select committee claim it “found no evidence” that then-President Donald Trump offered to get 10,000 National Guard troops for the Mayor of D.C. when the committee heard direct testimony that Trump did make that offer and it was rejected?

 

 

Question 2: Does this evidence that the Democrats January 6 select committee hid from the American public tell us why Trump has never been charged with inciting insurrection????

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/hidden-jan-6-transcript-revealed-undermining-house-committees-claim-5604862?

 

.

 

Charged, tried and convicted of insurrection by media.

 

It's how we save our democracy dontcha know?

[B-Man]

 

[BillsFanNC]

 

 

[Doc]

The more time passes…

[BillsFanNC]

3 minutes ago, Doc said:

The more time passes…

 

Yep. 

 

The story of Trump lunging for the steering wheel had the left in an absolute frenzy for days. 

 

See Trump is unhinged! He wanted to lead the Insurrection!

 

Turns out its  not true.  Not even a little bit.

 

So what happens years later when the truth, that sane people already knew, comes out?

 

Crickets from the left. No acknowledgement that the story that was breathlessly reported was dead wrong.

 

It's the same cycle over and over and over again.

 

This is why no sane person believes legacy media reporting.  Especially when it comes to the great orange menace.

[BillStime]

[BillsFanNC]

 

[BillsFanNC]

"You had one of the first-hand witnesses in myself, in the Oval Office days before January 6 with the President and his national command team, where President Trump authorized 10+ thousand National Guardsmen and women. We've been saying that since that day. That hasn't changed. I testified before the January 6 committee on it. I got subpoenaed by the special counsel's department of Justice on it. I've done media interviews across the country on it. It has never changed. That authorization occurred. We sent senior DoD employees to Mayor Bowser 's office and the Capitol Police with Nancy Pelosi because they're responsible for DC. And consistent with DoD history and the law, they have to make a request for the National Guard before it can be deployed. President Trump, step one, authorizes it, like any president must, then they make the request, like any governor would, say, after a national disaster in California or any big sporting event in Kansas. Here it's DC, so it's the mayor. In writing, Mayor Bowser and Nancy Pelosi and the Capitol Police rejected it. We put those receipts out. It's their written word, not ours. But the mainstream media has spent a number of years attacking that truth because it guts their narrative of disinformation - the campaign that they have put on about 'insurrection.' And so, it's nice to be vindicated, but the important thing is to get the truth out." - Kash Patel

 

 

[Thurmal34]

Try to overthrow the will of the people, lose again in 2024. Only this time get less support.

 

35%

[Unforgiven]

    Just like the useful idiots on this site, they all know the truth isn't the issue...they target low int dullard voters

who believe what they want - Spamming and screaming lies with this large arching platform is highly successful for them.