Jump to content

roe polling


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Big Blitz said:

22 of the 33 Senate seats up are Democrats.  
 

I already had it in my head the GOP will gain the Senate.  

 

That’s the forecast and exactly why Ds aren’t proposing anything about Abortion nationally.  
 

https://www.270towin.com/2024-senate-election/

 

Odds are that the dems pick up the house and the repubs pick up the senate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

Been trying to tell them
They’ll just have to see it whenever the elections happen

This is the problem.  Your statement is indicative of the greater problem of all of this.

 

You see it as "them" vs "us."

 

It's all of us. The kind who see it as "them" vs "us" pound their chest as if it is some glorious virtue of knowledge to say anything. It's not. Never will be. Until people reunite to realize it is all "us" we will continue with he downward spiral that this country has had for 100 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SCBills said:


Trump’s biggest issue is his narcissistic obsession to crap all over vote-by-mail. 
 

Also - In states like Georgia and Arizona, he’s struggled with the “RINO” vote.  Problem is, those are reliable voters.  The voters he’s brought in are low propensity voters who never really voted until Trump came onto the scene.  They don’t show up in special elections and midterms.  
 

It’s a huge issue for Republicans nationally and locally - See, Long Island where R’s waited to day of to vote in their special election only to have a big snow storm.

 

Kari Lake running in Arizona where she has a mortal enemy in John McCain’s daughter.  It’s all so haphazard and ridiculous. 
 

Abortion might get one more bite at the apple as a mass motivating issue this fall, but if Trump does come out at 15 weeks, it takes a lot of steam out of that issue.  The pro-choice single issue voters and ultra-liberal unmarried women will obviously be motivated to vote, but 15 weeks is aimed at the suburban voters who aren’t entirely comfortable with what’s occurred since Roe was overturned.  Trump was never winning the first group.. he can certainly win back the second group. 

Except your glossing over the fact that Donald Trump said that he was proud of what he did regarding abortion putting in those conservatives into the Supreme Court
 

People do watch TV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

^^^^

 

Lies and ***t posting (the same story in multiple threads is some real deal fear) for a group of people running on killing kids and destroying families bc they’re broke.  
 

That tweet wants you to think the government is tracking all pregnancies - apparently it’s fine to track your vaccination status that will make your heart explode, but this which they are deliberately misleading what it is - that’s crazy government overreach.  

 

This is their headline because their readers are stupid and emotional above all else:

 

“The creepy Alabama Senator wants the federal government to track pregnancies.”

 


 

But bc we will correct their egregious lies - this is what her proposal would do:

 

Create an OPTIONAL "clearinghouse of relevant resources available for pregnant and postpartum women, and women parenting young children."

 

The morons then go on to tell their readers that are good with killing kids, it’s likely this resource will not provide info about abortion - because it’s a tool designed to support women (who the writers apparently think you aren’t aware that abortion is an option there are plenty of government resources that exist that will steer you that way - that use of government is fine - but oh no this resource may not recommend you kill your kid.

 

This is not as per the losers behind this group want you to believe, a federal database of all pregnancies.  
 

So sorry, that needs to be corrected.  The loser behind the post will follow this up with brain dead drivel and memes that aren’t worth your time.  
 


And isn’t it nice.  These people at communist organizations like Medias that claim to be pro women, have no problem personally attacking the woman behind the bill by degrading her as creepy.  

 

And also LOL per the tweet - “pregnant Americans.”  Congrats on voting for people like that.  Pregnant people.  Not women.  People.  Lol lol.   But they want to protect women.  They can’t even define women.  

  • Vomit 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

That tweet wants you to think the government is tracking all pregnancies - apparently it’s fine to track your vaccination status that will make your heart explode, but this which they are deliberately misleading what it is - that’s crazy government overreach.  


That’s exactly what it’s doing…

 

Don't you have a predator priest to defend? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Big Blitz said:


 

And how are they getting to this website - is the government forcing them to register their pregnancies?  

 

Help us all understand the evil lengths we are going to in order to save babies.  

 

You’re welcome, Ditz. Glad I could provide the detail you said doesn’t exist.

 



 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

You’re welcome, Ditz. Glad I could provide the detail you said doesn’t exist.

 



 

 


 

I didn’t say there was no federal resource.

 

You and your people per the tweets you’re now deleting framed it as the Federal Government now “want to track your pregnancies:”

 

 

Sen. Katie Britt Introduces Bill to Create Federal Database of Pregnant People

 

The creepy Alabama Senator wants the federal government to track pregnancies

 

https://meidasnews.com/news/sen-katie-britt-introduces-bill-to-create-federal-database-of-pregnant-people

 

Of pregnant PEOPLE.  Forced.  That’s what you’re implying.  A forced federal data base to track your pregnancy.  
 

 

 

The bill:

 

The bill would require states to apply child support obligations during pregnancy and would launch a website — Pregnancy.gov— with resources related to pregnancy, including information about adoption agencies, but not abortion clinics.


 

https://www.axios.com/2024/05/09/senate-republicans-pregnant-women-moms-katie-britt

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...