Doc Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 58 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: There was a bipartisan deal on the table you’re not gonna be able to blame the Democrats for this Joke didn't need Congress to reverse Trump's policies on Day One, that led to 8M illegals coming in (so far). He doesn't need Congress to reverse those reversals and stop the flow into the country. But that would give Trump a win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 1 hour ago, Doc said: Joke didn't need Congress to reverse Trump's policies on Day One, that led to 8M illegals coming in (so far). He doesn't need Congress to reverse those reversals and stop the flow into the country. But that would give Trump a win. Once again, you need to learn what the word bipartisan means There was a deal on the table that actually gives the president any president. I know that you don’t know this because you didn’t read the bill authority to shut down the border. It was there on the table. The Republicans came up with it, and then they killed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 Nothing less than treason here: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 8 hours ago, John from Riverside said: Once again, you need to learn what the word bipartisan means There was a deal on the table that actually gives the president any president. I know that you don’t know this because you didn’t read the bill authority to shut down the border. It was there on the table. The Republicans came up with it, and then they killed it. I know that bipartisan means. There is no need for bipartisanship when Joke is the only one who created this crisis and is the only one needed to fix it, or at least make it better. Again needing to deal to stop the flow of illegals into the country means you don't want to do it unless you're given something in return. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T master Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 (edited) 23 hours ago, John from Riverside said: Saving the taxpayers money What a joke you have Republicans in the house right now that are stealing the taxpayers money they have done nothing for you If you think it's only republicans you have blinders on . But given you reply it says all we need to know about your bias opinions !! Edited February 28 by T master 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T master Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 22 hours ago, John from Riverside said: I really wish that those new chip factories would not have went into red states. All they do is B word. I really wish that that infrastructure bill would not affect roads in red states. All they do is B word. They went into red states because they don't rape the businesses with their taxes . Right now Tenn. is booming with many companies coming here for that exact reason . But that will probably change soon because all of those that are fleeing Cali, Oregon, Seattle are moving here & will bring their politics with them & ruin this state like they have the states they are leaving . But by the way WTH does your reply have to do with the links i posted they are about immigration DS !! Isn't it just like a progressive Dem to do the let's change the subject & not answer the questions put to them . WTFE ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffeesforclosers Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 Impeachment is a partisan exercise in the modern era. Unless your party has supermajorities in the house and senate, there is no practical point in doing it. It will always go no where on a party line vote. So don't bother wasting anybody's time unless you want to grandstand for clicks, views, and clout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 1 hour ago, Coffeesforclosers said: Impeachment is a partisan exercise in the modern era. Unless your party has supermajorities in the house and senate, there is no practical point in doing it. It will always go no where on a party line vote. So don't bother wasting anybody's time unless you want to grandstand for clicks, views, and clout. I agree. But did you feel that way when it happened to Trump? Twice? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 29 Author Share Posted February 29 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz28 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 Ever heard of selective enforcement GQP? Well, every person who's taken CRJ101 has. It's not a crime to use selective enforcement, and it happens thousands maybe millions of times every day. No one ever got impeached for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 OUTRAGE: Alejandro Mayorkas Refuses to Admit Laken Riley's Murderer Should Not Have Been in the USA On Sunday, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas appeared on "Face the Nation" with correspondent Margaret Brennan. During a discussion of the recent murder of Georgia nursing student Laken Riley, Mayorkas' answers were, to say the least, evasive. https://redstate.com/wardclark/2024/03/03/outrage-alejandro-mayorkas-refuses-to-admit-laken-rileys-murderer-should-not-have-been-in-the-usa-n2170868 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 On 2/28/2024 at 5:35 AM, Doc said: I know that bipartisan means. There is no need for bipartisanship when Joke is the only one who created this crisis and is the only one needed to fix it, or at least make it better. Again needing to deal to stop the flow of illegals into the country means you don't want to do it unless you're given something in return. Biden was trying to get immigration reform not executive orders from the president that could be reversed by the next president An actual bill pled into law agreed on both sides Just take it for what it is the Republicans don’t want to work with the Democrats on anything they can’t afford to. They’re already looking like ***** as it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 Why should anyone care after "Fvck your feelings"? I mean, fvck YOUR feelings. Have a nice day. Enjoy playing by the rules you created. You're outnumbered, you have been for some time, and you're not exactly attracting followers. Please enjoy withering away with Jesus and kindly fvck off. We are witnessing the dead cat bounce of our boomer parents and I'm here for it. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted March 4 Author Share Posted March 4 Illegal immigrants Illegal immigrants Illegal immigrants FU Mayorkas. Never use the language that commies demand. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 6 hours ago, John from Riverside said: Biden was trying to get immigration reform not executive orders from the president that could be reversed by the next president An actual bill pled into law agreed on both sides Just take it for what it is the Republicans don’t want to work with the Democrats on anything they can’t afford to. They’re already looking like ***** as it is. And yet the Dems are still being blamed for the border crisis. You know why. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 13 minutes ago, Doc said: And yet the Dems are still being blamed for the border crisis. You know why. Because there is a Democratic president in charge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted March 4 Author Share Posted March 4 Wake us up when we get a "bi-partisan" bill that allows zero illegal crossings per day. Zero. Zero point zero. Until then JFR and the rest if the commies can fuk.c right off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 42 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: Because there is a Democratic president in charge Yup. Who created the border crisis all on his own. And he can fix it the same way. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 (edited) On 2/28/2024 at 11:04 AM, Doc said: I agree. But did you feel that way when it happened to Trump? Twice? Just remember on one of those impeachments the Republicans were saying that their vote might’ve been different. Had he not been leaving office They left it to judicial system Now the judicial system is doing its thing 1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said: Wake us up when we get a "bi-partisan" bill that allows zero illegal crossings per day. Zero. Zero point zero. Until then JFR and the rest if the commies can fuk.c right off. Zero illegal closings you mean like under Trump And it wasn’t happening even under Trump but you’re a dumbass like that Edited March 4 by John from Riverside 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 21 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: Just remember on one of those impeachments the Republicans were saying that their vote might’ve been different. Had he not been leaving office They left it to judicial system Now the judicial system is doing its thing The J6 impeachment? I think most people are now realizing he had nothing to do with the idiots who broke into the Capitol. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts