Jump to content

Should Presidents have absolute immunity for life?


Should Presidents have absolute immunity for life?  

19 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Presidents have absolute immunity for life?

    • Yes
      2
    • No
      17


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BillStime said:


Well, JaCrisp - you mysteriously left out your inferences of:

 

1) Hillary

2) Emails

3) Russia

4) Accusing Obama of killing his Chef (fkn pathetic)

 

All you do is deflect.

 

 

 

 

I added those for context, but ultimately answered your question…twice…👍

 

 

Edited by JaCrispy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

I added those for context, but ultimately answered your question…twice…👍

 

 


Context?

 

Hillary was never POTUS and Obama wasn’t POTUS when his chef died.

 

What would conspiracies do without you? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Context?

 

Hillary was never POTUS and Obama wasn’t POTUS when his chef died.

 

What would conspiracies do without you? 

 

Well, the Hillary hoax was, literally, a conspiracy amongst several actors in the government… obama’s chef dyingin his backyard did happen…whether or not it was a conspiracy remains to be seen…

 

But that why I said anything is possible- because things that no one ever expects to happen, do happen sometimes…👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Well, the Hillary hoax was, literally, a conspiracy amongst several actors in the government… obama’s chef dyingin his backyard did happen…whether or not it was a conspiracy remains to be seen…

 

But that why I said anything is possible- because things that no one ever expects to happen, do happen sometimes…👍


Keep spinning! 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

Well, the Hillary hoax was, literally, a conspiracy amongst several actors in the government… obama’s chef dyingin his backyard did happen…whether or not it was a conspiracy remains to be seen…

 

But that why I said anything is possible- because things that no one ever expects to happen, do happen sometimes…👍

No, it literally is a conspiracy and remains so because no one is bringing this up except for the right and you can’t prosecute without proof I know they try but it doesn’t work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

No, it literally is a conspiracy and remains so because no one is bringing this up except for the right and you can’t prosecute without proof I know they try but it doesn’t work

Can’t prosecute when people are being protected by the authorities…

 

Theres a reason why they didn’t charge Hillary and Biden for crimes regarding documents, yet they have no trouble charging Trump- because people in the Establishment have immunity to commit crimes…

 

I don’t mind politicians being charged for crimes (they should be), but ALL need to be charged, especially when authorities admitted crimes were committed…👍

 

Otherwise, people will not agree with the reasons Trump is being charged…And this is why, despite his court troubles, Trump remains the presidential front runner- because people can see through the BS…

 

It would have destroyed any other candidate, and the Establishment was hoping it destroyed Trump, too…But people are hip to what’s going on, and he will only get stronger, to the dismay of the Left and the Establishment…👍

 

 

 

 

Edited by JaCrispy
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Can’t prosecute when people are being protected by the authorities…

 

Theres a reason why they didn’t charge Hillary and Biden for crimes regarding documents, yet they have no trouble charging Trump- because people in the Establishment have immunity to commit crimes…

 

I don’t mind politicians being charged for crimes (they should be), but ALL need to be charged, especially when authorities admitted crimes were committed…👍

 

Otherwise, people will not agree with the reasons Trump is being charged…And this is why, despite his court troubles, Trump remains the presidential front runner- because people can see through the BS…

 

It would have destroyed any other candidate, and the Establishment was hoping it destroyed Trump, too…But people are hip to what’s going on, and he will only get stronger, to the dismay of the Left and the Establishment…👍

 

 

 

 

Sounds like more conspiracy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Sounds like more conspiracy

It is a conspiracy.  Its obvious the democrats are going to an unprecedented effort that stretches the boundaries of ethics and legality by coordinating legal actions through many court battles while running a full court press to keep Trump from returning to the White House.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

Can’t prosecute when people are being protected by the authorities…

 

Theres a reason why they didn’t charge Hillary and Biden for crimes regarding documents, yet they have no trouble charging Trump- because people in the Establishment have immunity to commit crimes…

 

I don’t mind politicians being charged for crimes (they should be), but ALL need to be charged, especially when authorities admitted crimes were committed…👍

 

Otherwise, people will not agree with the reasons Trump is being charged…And this is why, despite his court troubles, Trump remains the presidential front runner- because people can see through the BS…

 

It would have destroyed any other candidate, and the Establishment was hoping it destroyed Trump, too…But people are hip to what’s going on, and he will only get stronger, to the dismay of the Left and the Establishment…👍

 

 

 

 


The reason Hillary, Biden, and Pence weren’t charged but Trump was is because that’s what the law and case law called for given the facts of the cases. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...