Jump to content

Fani Willis: Corrupt Marxist BLM Activist. Met with both WH and J6 Committee before Indicting Trump


Recommended Posts

Lmao.  The part where she said she keeps campaign cash from past campaigns to use as a slush fund to pay her boyfriend might come back to haunt her.  

 

She literally provided evidence of campaign finance lawlessness. 

 

But if msm says so.  Lol

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Smart move by the Willis team. Trump’s team have proven nothing disqualifying. 


She should step down from the prosecution of this case. Even if her actions don’t end up amounting to actual impropriety, they certainly appear unethical and are clearly distracting from the case. 
 

There’s no reason that she can’t withdraw from the case and have a deputy take the lead. The longer she stays involved, the more this is going to be a circus. 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Trump strategy:  I have no evidence you did any of the things I'm claim you did, but if I can prove you did something/anything, then I can say, "well if you'd do that, you'd probably steal money from the school lunch program and fake the moon landing".  In other words:  TOTAL EXHONERATION!!!!   The buffoons fall for it EVERY SINGLE TIME.  

1 hour ago, ChiGoose said:


She should step down from the prosecution of this case. Even if her actions don’t end up amounting to actual impropriety, they certainly appear unethical and are clearly distracting from the case. 
 

There’s no reason that she can’t withdraw from the case and have a deputy take the lead. The longer she stays involved, the more this is going to be a circus. 

We all know who the real ring leader is

2 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Lmao.  The part where she said she keeps campaign cash from past campaigns to use as a slush fund to pay her boyfriend might come back to haunt her.  

 

She literally provided evidence of campaign finance lawlessness. 

 

But if msm says so.  Lol

Didn't use an ATM, check, or credit card:  MUST be a witch!  Let's see if she floats.  MAGA turd.

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Dislike 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, daz28 said:

The Trump strategy:  I have no evidence you did any of the things I'm claim you did, but if I can prove you did something/anything, then I can say, "well if you'd do that, you'd probably steal money from the school lunch program and fake the moon landing".  In other words:  TOTAL EXHONERATION!!!!   The buffoons fall for it EVERY SINGLE TIME.  

We all know who the real ring leader is

Didn't use an ATM, check, or credit card:  MUST be a witch!  Let's see if she floats.  MAGA turd.

Settle down sweetie.  She effed up bad by admitting to campaign finance crimes on the stand.   You know who keeps cash to hide the trail.  Criminals.  

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Settle down sweetie.  She effed up bad by admitting to campaign finance crimes on the stand.   You know who keeps cash to hide the trail.  Criminals.  

I'll play by your rules for a change, you know who pleads the 5th?  

 

During the 2016 campaign, Trump had blasted aides of his former opponent, Democrat Hillary Clinton, for pleading the Fifth in the probe of her use of a private email server.

"So there are five people taking the Fifth Amendment, like you see on the mob, right? You see the mob takes the Fifth. If you're innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?"

 

Trump invokes Fifth Amendment nearly 450 times in N.Y. AG’s civil probe of his business practices

An attorney for Trump said the former president answered only one question, about his name, during the four-hour deposition.

 

I'm baiting and switching like you guys do, but the difference is, I'm providing a FACT, while you're creating the 10,000 conspiracy theory.  This one is now campaign fraud, wrought from an investigation into impropriety, that has only provided "huggin an kissin" as proof of TOTAL EXHONERATION!!! History will view you guys as the biggest idiots of all time.  So dumb even a caveman wouldn't do it. 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, daz28 said:

I'll play by your rules for a change, you know who pleads the 5th?  

 

During the 2016 campaign, Trump had blasted aides of his former opponent, Democrat Hillary Clinton, for pleading the Fifth in the probe of her use of a private email server.

"So there are five people taking the Fifth Amendment, like you see on the mob, right? You see the mob takes the Fifth. If you're innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?"

 

Trump invokes Fifth Amendment nearly 450 times in N.Y. AG’s civil probe of his business practices

An attorney for Trump said the former president answered only one question, about his name, during the four-hour deposition.

 

I'm baiting and switching like you guys do, but the difference is, I'm providing a FACT, while you're creating the 10,000 conspiracy theory.  This one is now campaign fraud, wrought from an investigation into impropriety, that has only provided "huggin an kissin" as proof of TOTAL EXHONERATION!!! History will view you guys as the biggest idiots of all time.  So dumb even a caveman wouldn't do it. 

People generally take the 5th as a means of not being forced to testify against themselves.  But taking the 5th isn't an admission of guilt, or of innocence either. 

 

You mentioned the Trump NYS "fraud" case.  I'm still trying to wrap my head around that one.

 

Fraud.  Against whom?  The IRS or NYS or NY City tax authorities are not claiming taxes were not paid because of incorrect or inflated property values.  The banks or investors involved are not claiming they lost revenue or business or incurred tangible or financial harm and instead said what the Trump organization did in valuing properties is business as usual.  As the trial winds to conclusion I'm still not clear.  No involved party was defrauded of anything.  Who's the victim?  I think the entire thing is bullsheet. 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

People generally take the 5th as a means of not being forced to testify against themselves.  But taking the 5th isn't an admission of guilt, or of innocence either. 

 

You mentioned the Trump NYS "fraud" case.  I'm still trying to wrap my head around that one.

 

Fraud.  Against whom?  The IRS or NYS or NY City tax authorities are not claiming taxes were not paid because of incorrect or inflated property values.  The banks or investors involved are not claiming they lost revenue or business or incurred tangible or financial harm and instead said what the Trump organization did in valuing properties is business as usual.  As the trial winds to conclusion I'm still not clear.  No involved party was defrauded of anything.  Who's the victim?  I think the entire thing is bullsheet. 

 

 

 

 

 

Just an example of his hypocrisy.  Can you show me any evidence of actual impropriety, where Willis is showing a bias against Trump by appointing Wade?  If not, then I guess you'll think this is all bullsheet, too.  I only went off topic, because Tommy needs to see how he plays his game first hand, by me playing it back to him.  The GQP creates sides, and Willis is on the other side.  Doesn't matter what she actually did, she's the enemy, because Trump said so.  In Tommy's fantasy world she's now guilty of campaign finance, because she keeps some money at home, instead of in the bank.  Ridiculous.  

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

The TDS on display in PPP in recent days is glorious.

 

To the extent that I can see it.

 

Beautiful.

 

Rage on useful idiots.

The only person who's an idiot is the one who believes that intimacy is any kind of proof of impropriety.  This may come as a shock to Fox news cult, but friends also can conspire to do things, just as much as lovers can.  If you need evidence of this, look no further than executive appointments.  Presidents don't choose people for positions based on qualifications, but rather on what they've done to get you elected.  Trump has taken this to another level, where loyalty to him is more important than doing your job and what's right for the country after you're appointed.  But yeah, go ahead and be distracted by "huggin an kissin" in the meantime.  

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

People generally take the 5th as a means of not being forced to testify against themselves.  But taking the 5th isn't an admission of guilt, or of innocence either. 

 

You mentioned the Trump NYS "fraud" case.  I'm still trying to wrap my head around that one.

 

Fraud.  Against whom?  The IRS or NYS or NY City tax authorities are not claiming taxes were not paid because of incorrect or inflated property values.  The banks or investors involved are not claiming they lost revenue or business or incurred tangible or financial harm and instead said what the Trump organization did in valuing properties is business as usual.  As the trial winds to conclusion I'm still not clear.  No involved party was defrauded of anything.  Who's the victim?  I think the entire thing is bullsheet. 

 

Many are victims...of TDS.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, US Egg said:

This lady and her witnesses do not disappoint.

 

They’re like watching those defending themselves on Judge whoever TV.

No lie.  The only thing on par is the farm and msm trying so hard to make it seem legit.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...