Jump to content

The Walls be Closing


Kemp

Recommended Posts

Just now, HamSandwhich said:

Right, so you're a lunatic who thinks asking people to "peacefully" go to the capital and protest is the same as leading a riot? That is very loose, that is why it will be used in many different ways if it's allowed to go through and Trump is convicted, but you don't care, you get to feel good for about a day if he gets convicted, TDS man. 

his VP disagrees with you and will testify under oath after swearing on a bible.  Do you believe he will lie under oath?  Is his faith a show?  I don't think so.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

sure.  I won't be inciting an attack on the pillars of our government and great country.  I like the way it was designed and has worked for almost 150 years.  Traitors don't.

duck and bob...

It's called his moral authority is none at all. Do you give your moral authority to him? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said:

his VP disagrees with you and will testify under oath after swearing on a bible.  Do you believe he will lie under oath?  Is his faith a show?  I don't think so.

That doesn't matter, why did htey need to change the procedure after the fact? This is all legal theory, he thinks he didn't have the right, other scholars think he did. Who you choose to believe is beside the point, there is a question, enough of a question that they needed to change the law. WHY? Answer the dang question! 

Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said:

splain...no idea

He has no moral authority over me.

Time to work while you all sit in your mother's basements drinking the liberal coolaid and allowing the destruction of our constitution. See ya.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, HamSandwhich said:

Right, so you're a lunatic who thinks asking people to "peacefully" go to the capital and protest is the same as leading a riot? That is very loose, that is why it will be used in many different ways if it's allowed to go through and Trump is convicted, but you don't care, you get to feel good for about a day if he gets convicted, TDS man. 

I don't need to explain my moral stance to you, I only have to have that discussion with my family and God, see your way out of the conversation. I will say supporting the constitution and not having it burned down to take out one person is not a morally inept stance, it is your stance that is. I'll leave it at that.

 

Funny that you claim to support the Constitution while defending a man who said America should get rid of the Constitution. 

 

How do you rationalize that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HamSandwhich said:

That doesn't matter, why did htey need to change the procedure after the fact? This is all legal theory, he thinks he didn't have the right, other scholars think he did. Who you choose to believe is beside the point, there is a question, enough of a question that they needed to change the law. WHY? Answer the dang question! 

of course it matters.  The rest was asked and answered.  So do you support the fake electors calling for civil war?

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, HamSandwhich said:

Oh, in a bright blue Fulton County with bent prosecutors and judges? Yeah, that will look like justice to the entire country OR it will further degrade trust in the insitutions. My money is on the latter but you don't care. You just have that TDS, you love it, you lap it up, you enjoy it, and when they're carrying you out in shackles for something you said that led to someone else doing something, even if it has nothing to do with what they did, what will you tell the devil then? 

I still have full faith in the system. Heck, I have more faith in it now. We are punishing a law breaker who used his power to avoid punishment, Thank goodness someone steped up to stop him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

of course it matters.  The rest was asked and answered.  So do you support the fake electors calling for civil war?

It was not answered, there is still no explanation for "fake electors", were they not electors?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tiberius said:

I still have full faith in the system. Heck, I have more faith in it now. We are punishing a law breaker who used his power to avoid punishment, Thank goodness someone steped up to stop him. 

 

 

We can always count on you to keep those Marxist campfires burnin' keep up the good work comrade 

  • Disagree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HamSandwhich said:

It was not answered, there is still no explanation for "fake electors", were they not electors?

Whoever they are, they're calling for civil war.  Do you agree.

2 minutes ago, TSOL said:

 

 

We can always count on you to keep those Marxist campfires burnin' keep up the good work comrade 

hmmm....which side is burning books?

 

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/goebbels-burnings/

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The anger and desperation being displayed by Trump supporters here illustrates that The Walls Be Closing.

The big remaining question is will they resort to violence when their leader is convicted?

Of course some will, because Trump will be openly calling for it. 

For now, he is mostly only warning of the coming storm, but it's crystal-clear that if he goes down, he'll want the country burned to the ground.

Many of his supporters, including here, will be just fine with that.  

10 minutes ago, TSOL said:

 

 

We can always count on you to keep those Marxist campfires burnin' keep up the good work comrade 

 

You keep misunderstanding which side you're on.

It's Trump that is openly supportive of Communist dictators.

Logic simply doesn't exist for Trump supporters.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

Funny that you claim to support the Constitution while defending a man who said America should get rid of the Constitution. 

 

How do you rationalize that?

Trump did not advocate eliminating the Constitution and replace it with decrees and edicts.  As usual, context, which were allegations of election fraud.  

 

Trump said per CNN “Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” Trump wrote in a post on the social network Truth Social and accused “Big Tech” of working closely with Democrats. “Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”

 

What he should have said was: When the people cheating are also responsible for enforcing the rules what good are the rules? 

 

 

 

 

  • Disagree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in 2016,  I avoided talking politics at work. A cow-orker kept pressing me about who I voted for. Within earshot of her boss, I   said "The next President of the US." She starts saying "How could you vote for Trump?" I knew she was trying to get me in trouble. I said ' I never told you who I voted for." I told the truth. Whoever is  elected (was at about 1 PM on Election Day) will be the next President of the US."  Her boss just smiles at me. She was cool towards me until she quit months later.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...