Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Now you’re starting to get it 😉 

I gotta say there are things they are doing that I don't like, that's for sure. But it beats the alternative IMO.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

                             GhGF1O6XcAA8iwh?format=jpg&name=small

 

 

.


I always heard this from MAGAs but never actually got a definition on what “destroying the state” is 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


The kids recorded themselves doing it and posted it online to millions of views you mongoloid 

It wasn’t very nice, and I felt bad for Sanders. Still, they’re kids, and kids are not always nice.  

Posted
39 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

It wasn’t very nice, and I felt bad for Sanders. Still, they’re kids, and kids are not always nice.  


I don’t know, wasn’t the kid 21? My friends and I realized crank calls were mean by junior year of high school. 

Posted

A pet peeve: someone at work was talking to me and said I'm not going to get into politics with you but then proceeded to subtly express how she felt about things.

 

 

But you just did 🤣

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Another Fan said:

A pet peeve: someone at work was talking to me and said I'm not going to get into politics with you but then proceeded to subtly express how she felt about things.

 

 

But you just did 🤣

 

 

I know how that goes, but some people think Trump is not political because he was not a lifetime politician or believe his personal behavior is not political. I rarely discuss at work, most of my students think I am liberal being a Teacher from New York, and my coworkers are always surprised. 

Posted (edited)

nice to see there's a dozen R's in congress that actually care about the working man who makes too little to buy insurance and it's not provided eat work.  The ones who get screwed the worst.

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5273744-house-republicans-medicaid-cuts/

 

When asked specifically about lowering the federal match or per capita caps, Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) told reporters he would not support either. 

“I don’t know why you guys keep asking the same stupid f—ing question,” Lawler said. “I just said from the very beginning, I’m against per capita caps. I’m against changing the FMAP floor.” 

Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.) said he isn’t drawing a red line at any specific savings target. He said he supports federal work requirements, excluding noncitizens from eligibility, and letting states make eligibility checks every six months instead of once a year. 

“I’m a simple guy. People who are getting stuff now, who are legal and eligible should not be cut,” Van Drew said. He added there are at least 10 or 12 Republicans who “won’t go along” with Medicaid benefit cuts. 

 

I like Lawler.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
×
×
  • Create New...