Jump to content

The Democrat cartel


Recommended Posts

On 6/19/2023 at 11:38 AM, B-Man said:

I love twitter and the ability to just smash politicians for their constant hypocrisy.

 

Hypocrite Minority Leader.

 

 

He strikes again.       (really this should have gone in the Liberalism/Mental illness thread)

 

 

Bro, read the ROOM: Hakeem Jeffries DRAGGED for whining about Republicans 'trying to impeach everyone'

 

94308534-36cd-4c46-8d05-1fe8eae4ff4e-536

 

 

Really, dude?

 

Talk about zero self-awareness BUT then again, if he had any awareness he wouldn't be a Democrat.

 

Look at this nonsense:

 

https://twitchy.com/samj/2023/06/29/hakeem-jeffries-middle-class-right-impeaching-everyone-in-sight-n2384938

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


 

 

Kamala… They Are Coming for You 

 

The Cackling Vice President, Kamala Harris, is the domino that will fall first. 

by ARNOLD STEINBERG

 

“The powers in the Democratic Party can no more gamble on Kamala than on Joe.


If either is on the ticket, more than the White House is at stake.

 

Republicans would expand, not lose, their House majority. And Democrats would certainly lose their precarious hold on the Senate.

 

Their best hope is an election that again is a referendum on Donald Trump; but regardless of who the Republican nominee is, not a referendum on Joe Biden or Kamala Harris. Kamala must go before Joe does, certainly before Joe announces he won’t run.

 

One way or another — Kamala, they’re coming for you, and then Joe.”

 

https://spectator.org/kamala-harris-goes-first/

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Kamala… They Are Coming for You 

 

The Cackling Vice President, Kamala Harris, is the domino that will fall first. 

by ARNOLD STEINBERG

 

“The powers in the Democratic Party can no more gamble on Kamala than on Joe.


If either is on the ticket, more than the White House is at stake.

 

Republicans would expand, not lose, their House majority. And Democrats would certainly lose their precarious hold on the Senate.

 

Their best hope is an election that again is a referendum on Donald Trump; but regardless of who the Republican nominee is, not a referendum on Joe Biden or Kamala Harris. Kamala must go before Joe does, certainly before Joe announces he won’t run.

 

One way or another — Kamala, they’re coming for you, and then Joe.”

 

https://spectator.org/kamala-harris-goes-first/

 

It's a Catch-22.  Ditch her and the black vote revolts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Clean up the voter rolls ?

 

Can't have that  😡

 

 

FIGHT THE POWER: Republicans sue over rejection of party nominee to election board in Georgia’s most populous county. 

 

“The Republican Party in Georgia’s most populous county is suing local elected officials over the rejection of one of the party’s nominees to serve on the county election board, saying he was being punished for trying to clean up voter rolls.

 

In the lawsuit filed Friday, the Fulton County Republican Party asks a judge to order the county Board of Commissioners to appoint Jason Frazier to the county Board of Elections and Registration. Fulton County, which includes most of the city of Atlanta, is a Democratic stronghold.”

 

 

https://news.yahoo.com/republicans-sue-over-rejection-party-193121016.html

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


 

YES, THEY REALLY SAID IT:

 

House Republicans approved a $52.4 billion appropriations bill for State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs that includes prohibitions on any U.S. tax dollars going to research labs controlled by China, Russia, North Korea, Iran or Venezuela, or to fund gain-of-function research such as that in the Wuhan lab that produced the Coronavirus.

 

 

The Washington Free Beacon’s Andrew Kerr reports the response of Democrats:

“To Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee, led by Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D., Conn.), these measures unravel ‘the hard-fought credibility and influence the United States has earned as a global leader,’ the lawmakers said in a press releaseWednesday. ‘The bill threatens our national security and puts the American people and global health at risk,’ the Democrats added.”

 

 

No, they really did say that. It hurts U.S. national security to not fund research labs controlled by America’s adversaries.

 

They actually said it.

 

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/house-dems-slam-gop-plan-to-cut-funding-for-north-korea-china-iran/?utm_source=actengage&utm_campaign=FreedomMail&utm_medium=email

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

‘They Need to Do Something’:

McCarthy Urges Democrats to Hold Members Accountable for Continued Antisemitic Remarks

 

 

House speaker Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.) called on Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D., N.Y.) and the Democratic leadership to hold their members accountable for continued antisemitic remarks.

 

“They need to do something about it,” McCarthy said of Democratic leadership during a Monday press conference. “Because they’ve defended these individuals time and again. The only time action has ever been taken is when we had to take the action. This is a role for the leader, Hakeem, to prove that no, they’re not antisemitic.”

 

McCarthy was reacting to comments about Israel made by Representative Pramila Jayapal (D., Wash.), who chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus. “I want you to know that we have been fighting to make it clear that Israel is a racist state,” Jayapal said at a conference over the weekend.

 

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/mccarthy-calls-on-democrats-to-hold-members-accountable-for-continued-antisemitic-remarks/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

I find it humorous that somebody use the word cartel, whenever it comes to the Bidens
 

Is Joe Biden an old senile can barely walk can’t remember his own name 

 

Or

 

Is he an evil mastermind?

 

Which is it?

 

 

Well there is your problem.

 

The thread (from page one) is NOT about Joe Biden,

 

but about the perpetual democrat establishment in DC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AKA the "Cartel"

 

Quote

 

car·tel  noun

HISTORICAL

a coalition or cooperative arrangement between political parties intended to promote a mutual interest.

 

 

Sounds right to me, professor.

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

THIS SHOULD SURPRISE NO ONE WHO’S BEEN PAYING ATTENTION: 

 

Analytics show Democrats twice as radical, GOP more moderate.

 

To hear Democrats talk about Republicans, it’s pretty easy to get the impression that they are all right-wing rabble-rousers made more conservative after the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump.

 

The top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), for example, this week ranted about having to work with unbending “terrorists” across the aisle. . . .

 

But it’s not the Republicans who have radicalized over the past 50 years, but the Democrats, and by a huge margin, according to a deep dive into the latest CPAC ratings.

 

In one of the biggest surprises revealed since the ratings began, there are twice as many Democrats with perfect zero conservative ratings in the House and Senate today than in 1971. And there are significantly fewer Republicans with 100% ratings in the House and Senate today than 51 years ago.

 

The just-published 52nd Ratings of Congress from CPAC’s Center for Legislative Accountability found 14 House members and just three senators — Sens. Rand Paul (R-KY), Mike Lee (R-UT), and Mike Braun (R-IN) — with 100% ratings on the issues the group cares about. In 1971, there were 61 perfect House Republicans and 11 100% senators, including conservative giants Barry Goldwater of Arizona, New York’s James L. Buckley, and South Carolina’s Strom Thurmond.

 

The CPAC report found Democrats much more moderate decades ago. In 1971, there were 23 senators with zero ratings on the CPAC report card of conservative issues. Today there are 38, more than half the Democratic Caucus. In the House, there were 39 perfect liberal voters in 1971 compared to 76 today. Plus, there are dozens of House liberals with a 3% rating.

 

CPAC Chairman Matt Schlapp said the analytics show that many Republicans come to Washington and face-plant into the swamp’s deep end over time.

 

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/see-it-analytics-show-democrats-twice-as-radical-gop-more-moderate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Frankish Reich said:

keep defending groomers

 

 

Still no comment on the Democrats analytic proven move left.

 

Keep avoiding.

 

The person they asked for a comment is not the story,

 

but you knew that.

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Still no comment on the Democrats analytic proven move left.

 

Keep avoiding.

 

The person they asked for a comment is not the story,

 

but you knew that.

 

 

.

It's called party discipline.

And it is easier to maintain that when you don't have MTG and Boebert on your side of the aisle. Do the Dems have their nutcases too? Of course. But Nancy never let them bring their idiocy to floor votes.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...