Jump to content

If Trump loses and refuses to leave


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Is the question for me, today, or are you referencing the statement on election integrity in 2018?  The statement outlines the vote switching from 2 years ago.  Is that not sufficient evidence for you? 

 

Considering the presidential election wasn't held in 2018, no, it's not.


It would be helpful if Trump had won anything in court, or hadn't just watched all his lawyers quit on him.

 

But they don't want to risk being disbarred due to lying. At least Trump has Rudy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Interestingly enough your tax dollars already do go to it. Nobody is denied care in America. My problem with universal healthcare is that I’ve yet to see a program run by the federal government that delivers services with any degree of efficiency and/or quality. Luckily I’m not a big consumer of healthcare...knock on wood. 

You’ll never see it. 
 

Medicare, Social Security,  et al don’t work in a dollars in/dollars out sense because they are not established a such. 
 

The appeal to a jrob is the free fair stuff, someone has to give something up so he can feel good about the stuff he gets. 
 

Any program can be set up to thrive, but when you ignore actuarial principles, it never works.  Medicare has been around for nearly 60 years, and it functions as it was meant to—at a massive cash defective.   CBO says by 2049, the shortfall will be $44trillion.  
 

Jrobs sees more of this as a good thing while gnashing his choppers at defecit spending.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

Considering the presidential election wasn't held in 2018, no, it's not.


It would be helpful if Trump had won anything in court, or hadn't just watched all his lawyers quit on him.

 

But they don't want to risk being disbarred due to lying. At least Trump has Rudy. 

Ok, so now we know how you feel.  
 

Thankfully,  we have folks pursuing the issues that folks like you see as unimportant.  
 

If “all his lawyers quit on him” you have nothing to fear.  I’m uncertain where you get your intel but that’s patently false. Don’t let other people lead you around by the nose—even if they are willing to save your financial crisis by buying you off with the $75 visit to the doctor when you get the sniffles.   Get out and read a book bro. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

You’ll never see it. 
 

Medicare, Social Security,  et al don’t work in a dollars in/dollars out sense because they are not established a such. 
 

The appeal to a jrob is the free fair stuff, someone has to give something up so he can feel good about the stuff he gets. 
 

Any program can be set up to thrive, but when you ignore actuarial principles, it never works.  Medicare has been around for nearly 60 years, and it functions as it was meant to—at a massive cash defective.   CBO says by 2049, the shortfall will be $44trillion.  
 

Jrobs sees more of this as a good thing while gnashing his choppers at defecit spending.  
 

 

I think it’s WAY WAY simpler than that. In 2020 Democratic leaning voters chose the party that claimed they’re going to completely eliminate TWO big monthly bills: Health Insurance and Student Loans. Trump on the other hand didn’t promise to do either. Election over! 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I think it’s WAY WAY simpler than that. In 2020 Democratic leaning voters chose the party that claimed they’re going to completely eliminate TWO big monthly bills: Health Insurance and Student Loans. Trump on the other hand didn’t promise to do either. Election over! 

 

It's WAY WAY simpler than that: Wuhan virus (assuming you believe that massive fraud didn't take place).  The other stuff would have lost House seats if it truly was a driving force, but it actually flipped what will probably be 10 of them, and didn't flip the Senate.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% refuse to leave just based on this horse s*&t alone:

 

 

By Schwab’s own admission, the world must “act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies” — in short, he says, ever industry must “be transformed… we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”

 

In a warning of the rollercoaster of change we can expect if this plan goes ahead, Schwab continues: “The level of cooperation and ambition this implies is unprecedented. But it is not some impossible dream. In fact, one silver lining of the pandemic is that it has shown how quickly we can make radical changes to our lifestyles. Almost instantly, the crisis forced businesses and individuals to abandon practices long claimed to be essential, from frequent air travel to working in an office.”

 

As the WEF puts it of the coming technocracy that would rule our lives: “Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.”

 

 

 

 

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/shopping-i-can-t-really-remember-what-that-is/

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Ok, so now we know how you feel.  
 

Thankfully,  we have folks pursuing the issues that folks like you see as unimportant.  
 

If “all his lawyers quit on him” you have nothing to fear.  I’m uncertain where you get your intel but that’s patently false. Don’t let other people lead you around by the nose—even if they are willing to save your financial crisis by buying you off with the $75 visit to the doctor when you get the sniffles.   Get out and read a book bro. 

 

Folks?

 

You have Rudy Guliani. 

 

All the real lawyers they had in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia quit because they know there's no real case. 

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

I think it’s WAY WAY simpler than that. In 2020 Democratic leaning voters chose the party that claimed they’re going to completely eliminate TWO big monthly bills: Health Insurance and Student Loans. Trump on the other hand didn’t promise to do either. Election over! 

 

Neither of these things actually happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

100% refuse to leave just based on this horse s*&t alone:

 

 

By Schwab’s own admission, the world must “act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies” — in short, he says, ever industry must “be transformed… we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”

 

In a warning of the rollercoaster of change we can expect if this plan goes ahead, Schwab continues: “The level of cooperation and ambition this implies is unprecedented. But it is not some impossible dream. In fact, one silver lining of the pandemic is that it has shown how quickly we can make radical changes to our lifestyles. Almost instantly, the crisis forced businesses and individuals to abandon practices long claimed to be essential, from frequent air travel to working in an office.”

 

As the WEF puts it of the coming technocracy that would rule our lives: “Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.”

 

 

 

 

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/shopping-i-can-t-really-remember-what-that-is/

 

 

 

 

To those that don't understand why people want nothing to do with leftists, leave sites like this or create a social media circle devoid of anything left of center its because if you side with or are good with any of this at any level, you're an evil person that is flat out a no brainer actual enemy of democracy and freedom.  The things you've been ridiculously railing against Trump on for over 4 years. 

 

Who voted for this?  Who gave them this "authority?"  What the hell are they even talking about and why?

 

It's not the will of the people at this point for one entire side of the spectrum.  I don't blame people at all for wanting nothing to do with you.  

 

 

 

Not one, one leftist here (pretty much everywhere) will call this insanity out.  I'm not saying it's insane to want to pursue renewables or want to lead some type of financial reforms.  Ok.  

 

If its such great policy, run on it.  You don't need decrees in the middle of a sham pandemic.  And this is what fascism looks like.  

 

Let the people decide by actually running on these "ideas."  At least when 9/11 happened, we put the Patriot Act (a foreign policy reset) to a vote.  Look how that turned out by the way.  Did you clowns on the Left appreciate the UniParty leading the way to a "great reset" on global intervention and surveillance?  Maybe we should have tried harder.

 

At least it had to be voted on, expired, and voted on again.  

 

But hey.  If thinking Trump demanding a verification of every vote in these 5 battleground states is a threat to Democracy and your voice but that crap from the globalists aren't, then you are more than just a useful idiot.  You probably should shelter in place for life and let us never hear from you again please.   Thanks.  

Edited by Big Blitz
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Meanwhile in Venezuela.......oh wait that's Georgia 

 

 

What is even happening here? When was it filmed?

 

Why does she go to great lengths to not show the guys face?

 

Also, it might be worth pointing out that absentee ballots voted overwhelmingly for Biden. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

Folks?

 

You have Rudy Guliani. 

 

All the real lawyers they had in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia quit because they know there's no real case. 

 

Neither of these things actually happened. 

Again, you can choose to believe what you wish, but it’s easily disproven if you open your eyes.  
 

Btw, one of the challenges facing those who believe in election fraud is the very real threat of violence against them and their families.   
 

It’s the same challenge we’ll face if any part of the challenge ends up at the SC— where a constitutionalist such as ACB may well be faced with the question of whether or not to apply the law v have her children threatened and harmed.  
 

But since the president has only one lawyer about to get disbarred for pursuing legal remedy, you’ll have to keep your pitchforks out in the shed for a while. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Again, you can choose to believe what you wish, but it’s easily disproven if you open your eyes.  
 

Btw, one of the challenges facing those who believe in election fraud is the very real threat of violence against them and their families.   
 

It’s the same challenge we’ll face if any part of the challenge ends up at the SC— where a constitutionalist such as ACB may well be faced with the question of whether or not to apply the law v have her children threatened and harmed.  
 

But since the president has only one lawyer about to get disbarred for pursuing legal remedy, you’ll have to keep your pitchforks out in the shed for a while. 

You realize the Georgia Secretary of State and his wife have received death threats for him upholding a legal election, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

You realize the Georgia Secretary of State and his wife have received death threats for him upholding a legal election, right?

Yes. It’s why I’ve constantly suggested the following: DJT pursuing his options within the framework of the law is his right regardless of whether or not you like it.  
 

What we hear constantly is how damaging it is to our process that he’s actually following  the process. 
 

**just an fyi, I acknowledged allegations of death threats.  Personally, I’m very concerned that votes seem to pop up

out of nowhere as they dig deeper and deeper into the process.  The question of the actual outcome in Geo is outstanding.  I do not advocate Trump laying siege to Atlanta, but support his fight for transparency for as long as necessary. 

Edited by leh-nerd skin-erd
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Yes. It’s why I’ve constantly suggested the following: DJT pursuing his options within the framework of the law is his right regardless of whether or not you like it.  
 

What we hear constantly is how damaging it is to our process that he’s actually following  the process. 
 

 

b.c he alreadys did this and he lost... so what is he doing now?

 

Why the delay now once everything is done?

Edited by TBBills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

If it’s done, how could he pursue additional action?

 

 

By getting Rudy the only lawyer left that is willing to go down with him.


All the while he plays golf and laughs at his little followers doing his bidding.

Edited by TBBills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TBBills said:

By getting Rudy the only lawyer left that is willing to go down with him.


All the while he plays golf and laughs at his little followers doing his bidding. 

I understand that you think the President has one attorney, and he’s going to be disbarred.  That anyone who has paid the slightest bit of attention to American politics in the past couple years would say that out loud is what I find surprising. 

 

Thanks. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I understand that you think the President has one attorney, and he’s going to be disbarred.  That anyone who has paid the slightest bit of attention to American politics in the past couple years would say that out loud is what I find surprising. 

 

Thanks. 

 

Consider the source...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...