Super Tuesday Primaries 3/3

[transplantbillsfan]

17 minutes ago, Foxx said:

not that i don't believe you but i'm going to have to ask for evidence such as an audio recording.

 

Type in "access hollywood tape Donald Trump" on google or youtube.

 

You'll find it easily.

 

I transcribed that last night after listening to it.  Admittedly I had a couple Sierra Nevada Hop Bullets (go ahead... call me a beer snob  ) beforehand so maybe my transcription was wrong.

Edited March 5, 2020 by transplantbillsfan

[Deranged Rhino]

5 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Type in "access hollywood tape Donald Trump" on google or youtube.

 

You'll find it easily.

 

I transcribed that last night after listening to it.  Admittedly I had a couple Sierra Nevada Hop Bullets (go ahead... call me a beer snob  ) beforehand so maybe my transcription was wrong.

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

1 hour ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Oh puhleaze...

 

There's a big difference between hugs of comfort or "violating personal space" and kissing or grabbing a woman's ***** on first meeting her.

 

This unyielding defense of that is mind-boggling

 

Upon immediately meeting them and also the inferred ***** grabbing

 

Anyway... this has been fun... back to the main forum for a bit.

 

Maybe I'll pop back in after the next primary

Yes, there is a difference between consenual physical contact in the Trump scenario, and  ***** Joe pawing at a woman who prefers not to be pawed at. That doesn't change because you think it's acceptable, it isn't about you.  That said, you're the guy who defines consensual physical contact as "sexual assault".

 

 

 Surely, she must have wanted it, is that what you people say? 

 

Classic enabler. Its why Joe gets away with it. 

 

 

. 

Edited March 5, 2020 by leh-nerd skin-erd

[Foxx]

19 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Type in "access hollywood tape Donald Trump" on google or youtube.

 

You'll find it easily.

 

I transcribed that last night after listening to it.  Admittedly I had a couple Sierra Nevada Hop Bullets (go ahead... call me a beer snob  ) beforehand so maybe my transcription was wrong.

first of all, lazy ass.

 

i did as you suggested and found this video:

 

https://youtu.be/NcZcTnykYbw?t=67

 

should be cued up at the right place; 1:07 in.

 

he says, "you know, i'm automatically attracted to beautiful women, i just start kissing them. it's like a magnet, i just kiss, i don't even wait. and when your a star they let you do it. you can do anything... grab 'em by the *****, you can do anything"

 

so you must have been drunk on your preppy IPA's. he didn't say he did, he said 'you could'. so your whole argument is nothing more than, 'feelings'.

 

additionally, the way he is talking, has the air of braggadocio to it meaning it was 'guy talk'. now, just from knowing you through the years, i think i am pretty safe in saying that you don't understand the 'guy talk' and smak that gets bandied about amongst men in talking about their, 'conquests', of which this is all that this is. but, you have been conditioned by the media to say, 'OMG!!!! he is a horrible human being'. as such, your reaction here is understandable considering who it is coming from.

 

as has been mentioned previously here, there are women who will throw themselves at wealthy men so i don't doubt that what he says is true. these women who throw themselves at men like this, will let you do the things he speaks of, it is just a fact of life, it has nothing at all to do with 'liberal feelings', sorry.  

Edited March 5, 2020 by Foxx

[Uncle Joe]

7 minutes ago, Foxx said:

first of all, lazy ass.

 

i did as you suggested and found this video:

 

https://youtu.be/NcZcTnykYbw?t=67

 

should be cued up at the right place; 1:07 in.

 

he says, "you know, i'm automatically attracted to beautiful women, i just start kissing them. it's like a magnet, i just kiss, i don't even wait. and when your a star they let you do it. you can do anything... grab 'em by the *****, you can do anything"

 

so you must have been drunk on your preppy IPA's. he didn't say he did, he said 'you could'. so your whole argument is nothing more than, 'feelings'.

 

additionally, the way he is talking, has the air of braggadocio to it meaning it was 'guy talk'. now, just from knowing you through the years, i think i am pretty safe in saying that you don't understand the 'guy talk' and smak that gets bandied about amongst men in talking about their, 'conquests', of which this is all that this is. but, you have been conditioned by the media to say, 'OMG!!!! he is a horrible human being'. as such, your reaction here is understandable considering who it is coming from.

 

as has been mentioned previously here, there are women who will throw themselves at wealthy men so i don't doubt that what he says is true. these women who throw themselves at men like this, will let you do the things he speaks of, it is just a fact of life, it has nothing at all to do with 'liberal feelings', sorry.  

You listened? 
 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

43 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

Per Transplant, completely understandable kind older man providing comfort to a lady so young she likely didn't know she needed it. He's actually the hero here. The bald dude is emotional unavailable and distant in her time of need. ?

[3rdnlng]

1 hour ago, Foxx said:

serious question.

 

did say he 'could' or that he 'did'?

 

big difference.

I have the tape from a costume party:

 

 

[transplantbillsfan]

1 hour ago, Foxx said:

first of all, lazy ass.

 

i did as you suggested and found this video:

 

https://youtu.be/NcZcTnykYbw?t=67

 

should be cued up at the right place; 1:07 in.

 

he says, "you know, i'm automatically attracted to beautiful women, i just start kissing them. it's like a magnet, i just kiss, i don't even wait. and when your a star they let you do it. you can do anything... grab 'em by the *****, you can do anything"

 

so you must have been drunk on your preppy IPA's. he didn't say he did, he said 'you could'. so your whole argument is nothing more than, 'feelings'.

 

additionally, the way he is talking, has the air of braggadocio to it meaning it was 'guy talk'. now, just from knowing you through the years, i think i am pretty safe in saying that you don't understand the 'guy talk' and smak that gets bandied about amongst men in talking about their, 'conquests', of which this is all that this is. but, you have been conditioned by the media to say, 'OMG!!!! he is a horrible human being'. as such, your reaction here is understandable considering who it is coming from.

 

as has been mentioned previously here, there are women who will throw themselves at wealthy men so i don't doubt that what he says is true. these women who throw themselves at men like this, will let you do the things he speaks of, it is just a fact of life, it has nothing at all to do with 'liberal feelings', sorry.  

 

So I was correct in my transcription.

 

He literally states that he DOES kiss them.  He DOES.  I don't know how you're reading that otherwise when it's so obviously right there.

 

And despite whatever you think you've learned about me over the years of posting, I'm not a prude. 

 

(good example of why our "Internet selves" are often mistaken for real identities)

 

My buddies and I have partaken in enough "locker room banter", but it's associated with consensual acts or things that are just desires... but this isn't that.

Edited March 5, 2020 by transplantbillsfan

[Foxx]

23 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

So I was correct in my transcription.

 

He literally states that he DOES kiss them.  He DOES.  I don't know how you're reading that otherwise when it's so obviously right there.

 

And despite whatever you think you've learned about me over the years of posting, I'm not a prude. 

 

(good example of why our "Internet selves" are often mistaken for real identities)

 

My buddies and I have partaken in enough "locker room banter", but it's associated with consensual acts or things that are just desires... but this isn't that.

OMG, he kisses women. let's have a freakin' lynchin' partay. please point out where in there he states it is against their will. i'll wait....

 

once again, you are taking the whole thing out of context and inserting your, '#orangemanbad' feelings into it. step outside of yourself for a minute and understand how irrational you sound.

 

btw, i managed to obtain footage of you and the guys

 

 

 

Edited March 5, 2020 by Foxx

[3rdnlng]

3 minutes ago, Foxx said:

OMG, he kisses women. let's have a freakin' lynchin' partay. please point out where in there he states it is against their will. i'll wait....

 

once again, you are taking the whole thing out of context and inserting your, '#orangemanbad' feelings into it. step outside of yourself for a minute and understand how irrational you sound.

 

btw, i managed to obtain footage of you and the guys

 

 

 

I question this footage. Where are the man buns?

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

...the DNC's best foot forward.......

 

1. Democratic "Leadership"-Pelosi & Schumer

2. Offer up "The Killer B's" for primaries (Biden, Bernie & Bloomberg).

3. Set themselves up for a MMA style brokered convention.

4. VP female whispers include Hillary and Michele Obama.

5. Impeach....Impeach...Impeach...

6. Support for illegal immigration, sanctuary cities, public sidewalks as port-a-pottys in Dem led cities, homeless forgiveness for up to $949 in petty theft, etc.

 

...the Party to control politics in this nation?.......find be a BETTER example defining "disaster" and I'll gladly STFU.......

 

[Albwan]

2 hours ago, Foxx said:

first of all, lazy ass.

 

i did as you suggested and found this video:

 

https://youtu.be/NcZcTnykYbw?t=67

 

should be cued up at the right place; 1:07 in.

 

he says, "you know, i'm automatically attracted to beautiful women, i just start kissing them. it's like a magnet, i just kiss, i don't even wait. and when your a star they let you do it. you can do anything... grab 'em by the *****, you can do anything"

 

so you must have been drunk on your preppy IPA's. he didn't say he did, he said 'you could'. so your whole argument is nothing more than, 'feelings'.

 

additionally, the way he is talking, has the air of braggadocio to it meaning it was 'guy talk'. now, just from knowing you through the years, i think i am pretty safe in saying that you don't understand the 'guy talk' and smak that gets bandied about amongst men in talking about their, 'conquests', of which this is all that this is. but, you have been conditioned by the media to say, 'OMG!!!! he is a horrible human being'. as such, your reaction here is understandable considering who it is coming from.

 

as has been mentioned previously here, there are women who will throw themselves at wealthy men so i don't doubt that what he says is true. these women who throw themselves at men like this, will let you do the things he speaks of, it is just a fact of life, it has nothing at all to do with 'liberal feelings', sorry.  

 lol and all this time I thought he said 'grab 'em by the *****' literally oh ...

This is another one of those 'Mexico is going to pay for the wall'

libtard translations...

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

.....isn't "Superfluous Tuesday" a MUCH better description of their pathetic offerings??.....if that was their definition of "Super Tuesday", what the hell does "Mediocre Tuesday" look like?.....we're screwed.........

[Uncle Joe]

40 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

.....isn't "Superfluous Tuesday" a MUCH better description of their pathetic offerings??.....if that was their definition of "Super Tuesday", what the hell does "Mediocre Tuesday" look like?.....we're screwed.........

Bernie's Super Tuesday would have been wide left.

[LB3]

4 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Who said he was virtuous? Man had a playboy reputation.

 

How @transplantbillsfan and other TDS sufferers imagine it...

How sane people took it...

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

4 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

So I was correct in my transcription.

 

He literally states that he DOES kiss them.  He DOES.  I don't know how you're reading that otherwise when it's so obviously right there.

 

And despite whatever you think you've learned about me over the years of posting, I'm not a prude. 

 

(good example of why our "Internet selves" are often mistaken for real identities)

 

My buddies and I have partaken in enough "locker room banter", but it's associated with consensual acts or things that are just desires... but this isn't that.

Jesus you must be a crazy bunch to hang up with.

 

Transplant Buddy: I met a girl last night, we got together and it was awesome!

 

Transplant: Is she of the faith? 

 

Transplant Buddy:  What?! She was hot!

 

Transplant: Hot for Jesus? Was she hot for Jesus, and did you confirm acceptance for hand-holding aka first base and a peck on  the cheek aka second base? 

 

 

Transplant Buddy:  I don't think you understand the bases.  She was wild.

 

Transplant: Wild?  Like wild for education?  Was she into physics or theology?  That's so cool, when a woman is HFE (hot for education)? 

 

Transplant Buddy: I'm voting for Trump. Life is way easier over there. 

 

×××××

 

Biden is the deviant here based on your standards TBF. Let men and women be men and women. 

 

 

[JetsFan20]

14 hours ago, RochesterRob said:

  I disagree with calling Hoover an awful President (in a friendly respectful way).  He believed in letting the problems associated with the Depression working themselves out versus carrying out a heavy program of intervention by the federal government.  To his disadvantage he certainly was not charismatic when speaking in public.  World War II was the stimulus that rich and poor in the US were willing to accept to get the economy back on its feet.  Hoover's administration never aligned with an acceptable event that would allow for massive federal spending.  Stimulation in an area of the economy such as agriculture would have not made things better as there was over production already in that sector of the economy.  More production would have further reduced prices received for agricultural commodities making it even more difficult to service debts.  Even as tough as things were the public was not in favor of general wealth redistribution nor printing money to help out the most adversely affected.

Hoover was an awful president. The guy couldn’t even get his Supreme Court justice nominee through a senate that was majority republican (his party). Both congress and the senate realized he was in over his head very early on. 
 

He will also always be known as the guy that used federal tax dollars to bailout the banks yet refused to assist urban workers who were dying of starvation and poverty. 

[transplantbillsfan]

2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Jesus you must be a crazy bunch to hang up with.

 

Transplant Buddy: I met a girl last night, we got together and it was awesome!

 

Transplant: Is she of the faith? 

 

Transplant Buddy:  What?! She was hot!

 

Transplant: Hot for Jesus? Was she hot for Jesus, and did you confirm acceptance for hand-holding aka first base and a peck on  the cheek aka second base? 

 

 

Transplant Buddy:  I don't think you understand the bases.  She was wild.

 

Transplant: Wild?  Like wild for education?  Was she into physics or theology?  That's so cool, when a woman is HFE (hot for education)? 

 

Transplant Buddy: I'm voting for Trump. Life is way easier over there. 

 

×××××

 

Biden is the deviant here based on your standards TBF. Let men and women be men and women. 

 

 

 

What the hell... how'd you hear that conversation... are you stalking me?

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

9 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

What the hell... how'd you hear that conversation... are you stalking me?

Yes, of course, we're everywhere. 

 

 I overheard you talking as you left the first run screening of "Mulan", you also said you thought the movie disrespectful to women as Mulan had no strong octogenarian caucasian male to comfort her, eand there was no homage at all to the famous American politician Drops From Race. I didn't follow the second part, but you seemed troubled. 

 

We'll get through this! 

Edited March 6, 2020 by leh-nerd skin-erd

[RochesterRob]

9 hours ago, JetsFan20 said:

Hoover was an awful president. The guy couldn’t even get his Supreme Court justice nominee through a senate that was majority republican (his party). Both congress and the senate realized he was in over his head very early on. 
 

He will also always be known as the guy that used federal tax dollars to bailout the banks yet refused to assist urban workers who were dying of starvation and poverty. 

  Using federal dollars in a massive direct relief effort was very improbable to happen during Hoover's time in office regardless of who may have been President.  I think that just about anybody who would have been realistically elected to the office of POTUS then would have thought in terms of stabilizing the banks so money would be there for business to use with the end result of stimulating employment.  We can't use the prism of what came after Hoover's term to look at his administration.  I don't recall reading about any groundswell in congress for direct relief and he would have had the same issues with the Supreme Court striking down radical change just as FDR did.  While a sweeping federal presence in society is felt as being normal and second nature today back in 1929-1930-1931 that same presence would have most Americans fearing a socialist uprising.  I would never argue that Hoover was a great President I think he unfairly gets dumped on for things out of his control and measures that he would have been blocked from trying.  A lot of the ideas that went into FDR's AAA (agricultural adjustment act) came from the Federal Farm Board of Hoover's administration.