Jump to content

New York (again)


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

The study shows spikes in areas with windmills. I attached the study earlier and quoted some of it. Why would you reply if you had no idea what was in it? It is like you are proud of your ignorance.

It says those are just reported and not confirmed and no case study to match or do a baseline. 
 

Trump was just completely bullish itting. Are you saying he was truthful? 
 

You actually believe him that windmills are causing cancer? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Timmys article: 

 

This report is not intended to critically review the literature on wind turbines and health, as such reviews are available.[3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] The purpose of this report is to quantitatively assess the potential for possible diagnoses through the application of the proposed criteria. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

It says those are just reported and not confirmed and no case study to match or do a baseline. 
 

Trump was just completely bullish itting. Are you saying he was truthful? 
 

You actually believe him that windmills are causing cancer? 

So you believe the NIH created a report for Trump years before he was president just to give him cover? That has to be your rationale to call him a liar. You are truly just a political hack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

So you believe the NIH created a report for Trump years before he was president just to give him cover? That has to be your rationale to call him a liar. You are truly just a political hack.

I don’t believe anything you people say at all. This report does not back upTrumps lies 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

I don’t believe anything you people say at all. This report does not back upTrumps lies 

Yes facts and logic are difficult to accept when you are a political hack. I love your believe that NIH created a study that acknowledges the spike in cancer around windmills before Trump was president in order to give him cover.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

Yes facts and logic are difficult to accept when you are a political hack. I love your believe that NIH created a study that acknowledges the spike in cancer around windmills before Trump was president in order to give him cover.

They did no such thing. LOL, try and tell the truth, will you? 

But you were probably told that is what the study says and did not read it yourself 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

They did no such thing. LOL, try and tell the truth, will you? 

But you were probably told that is what the study says and did not read it yourself 

You wrote "It says those are just reported and not confirmed and no case study to match or do a baseline". It does not prove causality but it shows an increase of reported cancer, perhaps read what YOU wrote.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

You wrote "It says those are just reported and not confirmed and no case study to match or do a baseline". It does not prove causality but it shows an increase of reported cancer, perhaps read what YOU wrote.

 

 

You don't even understand what you are posting. That report says that people are claiming they have symptoms but that doesn't even mean thy are sick. This is what happens when people try and prove Trump said something truthful. they end up looking stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

You don't even understand what you are posting. That report says that people are claiming they have symptoms but that doesn't even mean thy are sick. This is what happens when people try and prove Trump said something truthful. they end up looking stupid. 

The report does not debunk they are sick, they have simply not confirmed it for that report. I will ask two questions to you- what does this study prove? And why was it started? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

The report does not debunk they are sick, they have simply not confirmed it for that report. I will ask two questions to you- what does this study prove? And why was it started? 

What does the American Cancer Society say? Hint, that Trump is lying 

 

The study you sited proves nothing

I have no idea 

 

 

You think Trump is honest, right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
×
×
  • Create New...